Crimes Amendment (Royal Flying Doctor Service) Act 2010

Administered by Attorney-General's Department

Legislation au C2010A00101 In force Act

Legislation content

 

 

 

 

 

 

Crimes Amendment (Royal Flying Doctor Service) Act 2010

 

No. 101, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

An Act to amend the Crimes Act 1914, and for related purposes

 

 

Contents

1 Short title

2 Commencement

3 Schedule(s)

Schedule 1—Amendments

Crimes Act 1914

 

 

 

Crimes Amendment (Royal Flying Doctor Service) Act 2010

No. 101, 2010

 

 

 

An Act to amend the Crimes Act 1914, and for related purposes

[Assented to 6 July 2010]

The Parliament of Australia enacts:

1  Short title

  This Act may be cited as the Crimes Amendment (Royal Flying Doctor Service) Act 2010.

2  Commencement

  This Act commences on the day this Act receives the Royal Assent.

3  Schedule(s)

  Each Act that is specified in a Schedule to this Act is amended or repealed as set out in the applicable items in the Schedule concerned, and any other item in a Schedule to this Act has effect according to its terms.


Schedule 1—Amendments

 

Crimes Act 1914

1  Subsection 85W(1)

Omit “prescribed narcotic substance within the meaning of the Customs Act 1901”, substitute “controlled drug, or a controlled plant, within the meaning of Part 9.1 of the Criminal Code”.

Note: The heading to section 85W is altered by omitting “narcotic substances” and substituting “controlled drugs or controlled plants”.

2  At the end of section 85W

Add:

Exceptions—supply of pharmaceutical products etc. to remote locations

 (3) Subsection (1) does not apply in relation to conduct engaged in by a person if the person engages in the conduct:

 (a) for the purposes of, and in accordance with, the Medical Chest Program; and

 (b) in the course of duties, powers or functions performed or exercised by the person in the person’s capacity as:

 (i) Australia Post or an employee of Australia Post; or

 (ii) the Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia or an RFDSA employee or contractor.

Note: A defendant bears an evidential burden in relation to the matter in subsection (3) (see subsection 13.3(3) of the Criminal Code).

 (3A) Subsection (1) does not apply in relation to conduct engaged in by a person if the person engages in the conduct:

 (a) for the purposes of, and in accordance with, a program, prescribed by the regulations, for the supply of packages of pharmaceutical products and medical supplies to remote locations; and

 (b) in the course of duties, powers or functions performed or exercised by the person in the person’s capacity as:

 (i) Australia Post or an employee of Australia Post; or

 (ii) a body, or the holder of an office or position, if the body, office or position is prescribed by the regulations in relation to the program; or

 (iii) an employee of, or a person who performs services for or on behalf of, a government, body or other person, if the government, body or other person is prescribed by the regulations in relation to the program.

Note 1: The regulations may prescribe a body or person by reference to a class of bodies or persons, and may make different provision with respect to different classes of bodies or persons (see subsection 33(3A) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901).

Note 2: A defendant bears an evidential burden in relation to the matter in subsection (3A) (see subsection 13.3(3) of the Criminal Code).

 (4) In this section:

Medical Chest Program means the program known under that name (or another name determined by the Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia) that is:

 (a) for the supply of packages of pharmaceutical products and medical supplies to remote locations across Australia; and

 (b) administered and operated by or on behalf of the Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia.

RFDSA employee or contractor means any of the following:

 (a) an employee of the Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia;

 (b) any other person (an RFDSA contractor) that performs services for or on behalf of the Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia;

 (c) a person who is employed by, or that performs services for or on behalf of, an RFDSA contractor.

Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia means one or more of the following bodies corporate (including, if the name of the body changes, the body as operating under the changed name, and, to the extent that the body stops performing any of its functions, any body corporate responsible for performing the same, or substantially the same, functions):

 (a) the Australian Council of the Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia;

 (b) the Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia Central Operations Incorporated;

 (c) the Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia (Queensland Section);

 (d) the Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia (South Eastern Section);

 (e) the Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia (Tasmanian Section);

 (f) the Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia (Victorian Section);

 (g) the Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia (Western Operations).

3  Application of amendments

(1) The amendment made by item 1 applies in relation to conduct engaged in by a person on or after the day the item commences.

(2) The amendment made by item 2 applies, on and after the day the item commences, in relation to conduct engaged in by a person before, on or after that day.

 

 

 

 

 

[Minister’s second reading speech made in—

House of Representatives on 2 June 2010

Senate on 24 June 2010]

(122/10)

 

Overview

The Crimes Amendment (Royal Flying Doctor Service) Act 2010 was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to address a legislative gap concerning the supply of pharmaceutical products and medical supplies to remote areas by the Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia (RFDS). This legislation aimed to ensure that the critical work of the RFDS, particularly in remote and rural regions, was not inadvertently criminalised under the provisions of the Crimes Act 1914. By amending the definition of controlled substances and introducing specific exceptions for the RFDS and other designated entities, the Act aimed to facilitate the delivery of essential medical supplies and services without legal hindrance. The policy objective was to support the operational needs of the RFDS while maintaining the integrity of Australia's drug control laws.

Scope and Application

The Crimes Amendment (Royal Flying Doctor Service) Act 2010 amends the Crimes Act 1914 to provide specific exceptions for the supply of controlled drugs or plants to remote locations in Australia. This Act applies to individuals and entities involved in the supply of pharmaceutical products and medical supplies to remote areas, including employees or contractors of the Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia and Australia Post, as well as other prescribed bodies or persons. The amendments apply to conduct occurring on or after the day the Act receives Royal Assent, ensuring that the exceptions are effective from that date. The Act also provides that the regulations may prescribe bodies or persons by reference to a class, allowing for flexibility in application. The geographic reach of the Act is national, as it pertains to the supply of medical supplies across Australia, and its application extends to all states and territories where such supplies are necessary. The Act does not specify any exclusions, but rather delineates the exceptions where the amended provisions do not apply. The application of these amendments is further extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, which may be prescribed by regulations to include additional bodies or persons as necessary.

Key Provisions

The Crimes Amendment (Royal Flying Doctor Service) Act 2010 (C2010A00101) introduces significant amendments to the Crimes Act 1914, primarily to provide exemptions from certain criminal provisions for the supply of controlled drugs and plants in remote areas. Section 1 of the Act specifies that it may be cited as the Crimes Amendment (Royal Flying Doctor Service) Act 2010, while Section 2 confirms that the Act commences on the day it receives Royal Assent. The amendments are detailed in Schedule 1, which includes changes to the definition of controlled substances under Section 85W(1) of the Crimes Act 1914, broadening the scope from "prescribed narcotic substance" to "controlled drug, or a controlled plant" as defined in Part 9.1 of the Criminal Code. The key operative sections of the Act, specifically in Schedule 1, modify the scope of the exemption from criminal liability for the supply of pharmaceutical products and medical supplies to remote locations. Section 3(3) provides an exception to the criminal provisions for conduct undertaken by individuals acting under the Medical Chest Program, administered by the Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia (RFDSA), or by Australia Post and its employees. Additionally, Section 3(3A) extends this exemption to include any conduct undertaken under a program prescribed by regulations, involving Australia Post, a prescribed body, or individuals acting on behalf of a prescribed government, body, or other person. These exceptions are contingent upon the conduct being performed in the course of duties, powers, or functions of the respective entities. The Act also defines terms such as "Medical Chest Program," "RFDSA employee or contractor," and "Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia" to clarify the scope of the exemptions. The obligations imposed by the Act require those involved in the supply of pharmaceutical products and medical supplies to remote locations to ensure their activities fall within the specified exemptions. For example, individuals and entities must confirm that their conduct aligns with either the Medical Chest Program or a program prescribed by regulations. This involves demonstrating compliance with the defined criteria, such as being an employee of Australia Post or the RFDSA, or performing services for a prescribed body. Additionally, the Act places an evidential burden on the defendant to prove that their conduct falls within the specified exceptions, as outlined in subsections 13.3(3) of the Criminal Code. Regarding consequences for non-compliance, the Act does not explicitly outline specific offences, penalties, or consequences for breach within its text. However, general provisions in the Crimes Act 1914 and the Criminal Code would apply, potentially leading to criminal charges, fines, or imprisonment for those who fail to adhere to the specified exemptions and engage in conduct that would otherwise be criminal. The exact penalties would depend on the nature of the contravention and the relevant provisions of the Crimes Act 1914 and the Criminal Code.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Criminal Law
Instrument
Act
Concepts
Commencement Provisions
Offence Provisions
Exceptions & Exclusions

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.