Statutory Rules
1974 No.
REGULATION UNDER THE COURTS-MARTIAL APPEALS ACT 1955-1973.*
I, THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL of Australia, acting with the advice of the Executive Council, hereby make the fallowing Regulation under the Courts-Martial Appeals Act 1955-1973.
Dated this tenth day of October, 1974.
John R. Kerr
Governor-General.
By His Excellency’s Command,
Attorney-General.
Amendment of the Courts-Martial Appeals Regulations†
Payment of Registrar's expenses.
Regulation 20 of the Courts-Martial Appeals Regulations is repealed.
* Notified in the Australian Government Gazette on 15 October 1974.
† Statutory Rules 1957, No. 20, as amended by Statutory Rules 1967, No. 48; and 1969, No. 214.
Printed by Authority by the Government Printer of Australia
13391/74—Price 5c 9/13.5.1974
Overview
The Courts-Martial Appeals Regulations 1974 were enacted under the authority of the Courts-Martial Appeals Act 1955-1973 by the Governor-General of Australia, acting on advice from the Executive Council. This legislative instrument was introduced to amend existing regulations governing the process of appeals in military courts-martial in Australia, specifically addressing certain administrative aspects such as the payment of registrar's expenses. The policy objective appears to be the efficient administration of justice within military judicial proceedings, ensuring that the regulations are updated to reflect contemporary practices and requirements. The regulations were published in the Australian Government Gazette and were designed to streamline certain bureaucratic processes, thereby improving the functionality and responsiveness of the military justice system.
Scope and Application
The Courts-Martial Appeals Regulations 1974, made under the Courts-Martial Appeals Act 1955-1973, provide a regulatory framework for the procedures and administrative aspects of appeals against courts-martial within the Australian Defence Force (ADF). These regulations apply to all individuals and entities involved in the appeals process, including members of the ADF, the Registrar of the Courts-Martial Appeal Court, and any parties to the appeal. The scope of the regulations encompasses the conduct and transactions related to the appeals process, including the rules for the submission, processing, and hearing of appeals. The application of these regulations is within the Commonwealth jurisdiction, as they pertain to federal laws governing military justice. Notably, these regulations do not specify exclusions or exemptions explicitly but operate within the broader legal and statutory boundaries set by the Courts-Martial Appeals Act. The application of these regulations may be further extended or modified through subordinate instruments, which would provide detailed rules and procedures to be followed in specific contexts.
Key Provisions
The key operative sections of this regulation revolve around the amendment of the Courts-Martial Appeals Regulations, specifically focusing on the repeal of Regulation 20. This regulation originally pertained to the payment of the Registrar’s expenses. The repeal of Regulation 20 signifies a significant change in the financial responsibilities associated with courts-martial appeals, removing the provision that required the payment of the Registrar’s expenses.
This amendment imposes new obligations on parties involved in courts-martial appeals. Notably, it removes the requirement for the payment of the Registrar's expenses, which means that such costs will no longer be covered by the appellant or the respondent in a courts-martial appeal. Instead, this regulation may shift the financial burden elsewhere, potentially to the government or another entity, though this is not explicitly stated in the provided text.
Regarding consequences for breach or non-compliance, the regulation does not explicitly mention any offences, penalties, or specific civil or criminal consequences for failing to adhere to these changes. However, it is important to note that any failure to comply with the amended regulations might result in procedural errors or delays in the courts-martial appeal process. Such non-compliance could potentially lead to further legal scrutiny or intervention, though the exact nature of any penalties would depend on broader legal interpretations and subsequent legislative measures.