STATUTORY RULES.
1924. No. 67.
———
REGULATIONS UNDER THE DEFENCE ACT 1903-1318.
I, THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby make the following Regulations under the Defence Act 1903-1918, to come into operation forthwith.
Dated this thirtieth day of April, 1924.
FORSTER,
Governor-General.
By His Excellency’s Command,
E. K. BOWDEN,
Minister of State for Defence.
——
Council of Defence Regulations.
Amendment.
The Council of Defence Regulations (Statutory Rule No. 159/1923) are amended by inserting the following sub-paragraph at the end of paragraph 3:—
“Provided that when the First Military Member of the Military Board is also exercising the duties of Inspector-General of the Australian Military Forces, the Second Military Member of the Military Board shall be a member at the Council for the purpose of bath General and Ordinary Meetings.”
Printed and Published for the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia by Albert J. Mullett, Government Printer for the State of Victoria.
C.6363.—Price 3d.
Overview
The Statutory Rules 1924 No. 67, made under the Defence Act 1903-1918, addresses the need for specific regulations to ensure the smooth functioning of the Council of Defence. Enacted by the Governor-General in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting on the advice of the Federal Executive Council, these regulations were introduced to amend the Council of Defence Regulations (Statutory Rule No. 159/1923). The primary objective of these amendments is to clarify the membership requirements of the Council for both General and Ordinary Meetings, particularly in situations where the First Military Member of the Military Board is concurrently serving as the Inspector-General of the Australian Military Forces. This ensures that the Council remains adequately staffed and capable of fulfilling its responsibilities effectively.
Scope and Application
The Council of Defence Regulations, established under the Defence Act 1903-1918, apply to the members of the Military Board and their roles within the Defence apparatus of the Commonwealth of Australia. These regulations pertain specifically to the administrative and operational structure of the Military Board, ensuring that the duties and responsibilities of its members are clearly delineated, particularly in circumstances where the First Military Member also serves as the Inspector-General of the Australian Military Forces. The regulations are designed to maintain the efficiency and effectiveness of the Military Board in executing its functions. Geographically, these regulations apply across the Commonwealth of Australia, reflecting the national scope of Defence matters. There are no explicit exclusions or thresholds stated within this legislative instrument; however, the regulations may be further refined or extended through subordinate instruments as necessary to address specific operational requirements or administrative changes.
Key Provisions
The Council of Defence Regulations (Statutory Rule No. 159/1923) are amended by inserting a new sub-paragraph at the end of paragraph 3 (1). This amendment ensures that if the First Military Member of the Military Board is simultaneously serving as the Inspector-General of the Australian Military Forces, the Second Military Member of the Military Board must participate in Council meetings for both general and ordinary sessions (2). This provision is intended to maintain an adequate representation and balance of authority within the Council of Defence, ensuring that all key military roles are adequately represented in decision-making processes.
The obligations imposed by this regulation primarily concern the composition and attendance of the Council of Defence. Specifically, it mandates that the Second Military Member must be present and actively participate in Council meetings whenever the First Military Member holds dual responsibilities (3). This requirement aims to uphold the integrity and functionality of the Council by ensuring that all critical roles are represented in decision-making processes, especially during periods when one individual holds multiple positions within the military hierarchy (4).
Failure to comply with these regulations could lead to operational inefficiencies or decision-making gaps within the Council of Defence (5). While the specific legal consequences of non-compliance are not detailed in this statutory rule, it is reasonable to infer that any significant deviation from the mandated participation requirements could potentially undermine the governance and effectiveness of the Council (6). This might indirectly result in broader implications for the administration and oversight of defence activities within Australia.