EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Proclamation
Issued by the authority of the Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasurer
Corporations (NZ Closer Economic Relations) and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2007
Item 6 in the table in subsection 2(1) of the Corporations (NZ Closer Economic Relations) and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2007 (the Act) provides that Schedule 2 to the Act will commence on a single day to be fixed by Proclamation.
Schedule 2 to the Act amends the Corporations Act 2001 to exempt companies, incorporated in a country that is prescribed in the Corporations Regulations 2001 (the Principal Regulations), from the requirement to lodge information or a copy of a document with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) that is already lodged with an authority of the prescribed foreign country, the functions of which include those equivalent to any of those of ASIC.
The Proclamation provides that Schedule 2 to the Act commences on 1 September 2007. This commencement date coincides with the commencement of the Corporations Amendment Regulations 2007 (No. 8), which amend the Principal Regulations to list New Zealand as a prescribed country.
The Proclamation is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
Overview
The Corporations (NZ Closer Economic Relations) and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2007 was enacted to address the issue of unnecessary duplication of regulatory processes for companies incorporated in countries with regulatory frameworks equivalent to Australia's. This Act was introduced by the Australian Parliament, aiming to streamline compliance for companies operating across borders, particularly in the context of closer economic relations with New Zealand. The policy objective of this legislation is to reduce the administrative burden on companies that are subject to regulatory oversight in both Australia and New Zealand by allowing them to avoid the need to lodge identical information with both the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and the equivalent regulatory authority in New Zealand. The Act facilitates this by exempting such companies from the requirement to lodge certain information with ASIC if it has already been lodged with the foreign authority, thus promoting efficiency and reducing redundancy in regulatory processes.
Scope and Application
The Corporations (NZ Closer Economic Relations) and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2007 applies to companies incorporated in a prescribed foreign country, specifically New Zealand in this instance, and aims to streamline reporting requirements by exempting such companies from lodging information or copies of documents with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) if these have already been lodged with a foreign authority whose functions are equivalent to ASIC's. This legislative amendment is designed to enhance efficiency and reduce duplication in regulatory processes between Australia and New Zealand. The Act operates within the Commonwealth jurisdiction and its reach extends to companies incorporated in New Zealand, thereby impacting the conduct and transactions of these entities within the Australian context. The Corporations Amendment Regulations 2007 (No. 8) further detail the application by prescribing New Zealand as the relevant country under the Corporations Regulations 2001, which are subordinate instruments extending the Act's provisions. The commencement of this legislative change is fixed by Proclamation, which aligns with the date the regulations come into effect, ensuring a cohesive implementation on 1 September 2007.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Corporations (NZ Closer Economic Relations) and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2007, specifically Schedule 2, are designed to provide relief to certain foreign companies in terms of regulatory compliance with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC). Section 917B(1) of the Corporations Act 2001, as amended by Schedule 2, introduces an exemption for companies incorporated in a prescribed foreign country from the requirement to lodge information or a copy of a document with ASIC if such information or document is already lodged with an equivalent authority in the foreign country. This is aimed at reducing duplication and administrative burden for companies operating across borders. The relevant prescribed country, as per the Corporations Amendment Regulations 2007 (No. 8), is New Zealand, which came into effect on the same day the Act's Schedule 2 commenced, as specified by the Proclamation.
The obligations imposed by the Act on the companies governed by it are primarily to ensure compliance with the regulatory requirements of their home country’s equivalent authority, such as the New Zealand equivalent of ASIC, and to ensure that they do not need to duplicate their filings in Australia. Companies incorporated in a prescribed country must make sure that the documents and information they lodge with ASIC's equivalent authority in their home country meet the standards and requirements set forth by ASIC in Australia. This includes ensuring that the information is accurate, complete, and timely, aligning with the standards and guidelines provided by ASIC. Additionally, the companies must keep records of their filings with the foreign authority for a period as required by the regulations, to be readily available for inspection if necessary.
Failure to comply with the provisions of the Act and the regulations could result in various consequences. Firstly, companies that do not comply with the requirement to lodge information or documents with ASIC when necessary may face administrative penalties under section 1317E of the Corporations Act 2001. The maximum penalty for non-compliance can include fines of up to 2,100 penalty units ($402,000 as of the date of the explanatory statement) for a corporation and imprisonment for up to five years for an individual officer. Additionally, continuous or repeated non-compliance could result in further enforcement actions by ASIC, including court orders or more severe penalties. These provisions underscore the importance of adhering to the legislative requirements to avoid severe repercussions.