Corporations Amendment Regulations 2009 (No. 2)

Administered by Department of the Treasury

Legislation au F2009L01178 Regulations Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Select Legislative Instrument 2009 No. 51

Issued by the authority of the Minister for Superannuation and Corporate Law

 

Subject - Corporations Act 2001

  Corporations Amendment Regulations 2009 (No. 2)

 

Subsection 1364(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (the Corporations Act) provides that the Governor-General may make regulations prescribing matters required or permitted by the Corporations Act to be prescribed, or necessary or convenient to be prescribed for carrying out or giving effect to the Corporations Act.

 

The Corporations Amendment (No.1) Act 2009 (the Amendment Act) inserts a framework into the Corporations Act to disqualify a person from managing corporations in Australia if the person is currently disqualified by a court, or by operation of the law, of a ‘foreign jurisdiction’ from being a director of a foreign company.

 

A ‘foreign jurisdiction’ is defined as a foreign country, or part of a foreign country, prescribed by the regulations as a foreign jurisdiction.

 

The Amendment Act fulfils a requirement under the Australian and New Zealand Governments’ Memorandum of Understanding on Business Law Coordination and closes a regulatory gap whereby people can escape disqualification simply by crossing the Tasman.

 

The purpose of the proposed regulations is to amend the Corporations Regulations 2001 is to prescribe New Zealand as a foreign jurisdiction.  Initially, the mutual disqualification regime will only apply to New Zealand.  However, the framework will allow for other countries to be added at a letter date.

 

Under the Corporations Agreement 2002, the Commonwealth must consult with the Ministerial Council for Corporations before making amendments to certain provisions of the Regulations.  The Council was consulted about these amendments, and notified of the Minister’s decision to dispense with the period of public exposure due to the minor nature of the reform and the fact that it was publicly exposed in a press release by the Minister on 26 February 2008.

 

The amendment to the Corporations Regulations 2001 (Corporations Regulations) names New Zealand as a prescribed foreign jurisdiction.

 

Details of the amendments to the Corporations Regulations are set out in the Attachment.

 

The Corporations Amendment Regulations 2009 (No. 2) is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.

 

The Regulations commence on the day after they are registered.


ATTACHMENT

 

Details of the Corporations Amendment Regulations 2009 (No. 2)

 

Regulation 1 – Name of Regulations

 

This regulation provides that the title of the Regulations is the Corporations Regulations 2009 (No. 2).

 

Regulation 2 – Commencement

 

This Regulation provides that the amendments commence on the day after they are registered.

 

Regulation 3 – Amendment of Corporations Regulations 2001

 

This Regulation provides a table to be included in the Corporations Regulations listing prescribed foreign jurisdictions for the purposes of subsection 206B(7) of the Corporations Act 2001.  New Zealand is named in the table as a prescribed foreign jurisdiction.  As such, people that are disqualified from managing companies in New Zealand by court order will be automatically disqualified from managing corporations in Australia.

Overview

The Corporations Amendment Regulations 2009 (No. 2) were enacted to implement the Corporations Amendment (No.1) Act 2009, which introduced a framework within the Corporations Act 2001 to prevent individuals disqualified from managing corporations in a foreign jurisdiction from managing Australian corporations. Specifically, the regulations aim to address a regulatory gap that previously allowed individuals to avoid disqualification by simply relocating to another country. By designating New Zealand as a prescribed foreign jurisdiction, these regulations ensure that individuals disqualified from managing companies in New Zealand are also disqualified from managing corporations in Australia. The regulations were developed in accordance with the legislative authority granted under the Corporations Act and were made in consultation with the Ministerial Council for Corporations, with the decision to bypass public exposure due to the minor nature of the reform. These regulations reflect a policy objective to enhance regulatory coordination between Australia and New Zealand, aligning with the Australian and New Zealand Governments' Memorandum of Understanding on Business Law Coordination. The regulations are intended to provide a seamless enforcement of disqualification orders across both jurisdictions, thereby maintaining corporate governance standards and preventing individuals with a history of corporate misconduct from evading disqualification by crossing international borders. The Corporations Amendment Regulations 2009 (No. 2) will be effective from the day after they are registered, ensuring timely implementation of the new regulatory framework.

Scope and Application

The Corporations Amendment Regulations 2009 (No. 2) introduces amendments to the Corporations Regulations 2001 to implement a new framework under the Corporations Act 2001, which aims to disqualify individuals from managing corporations in Australia if they are currently disqualified from being a director of a foreign company in a prescribed foreign jurisdiction. This regulatory change specifically targets New Zealand by prescribing it as a foreign jurisdiction, ensuring that disqualifications imposed by New Zealand courts are recognised and enforced in Australia. This legislative measure addresses a regulatory gap that previously allowed individuals to circumvent disqualification orders by moving between jurisdictions, thereby enhancing the integrity and consistency of corporate governance across Australia and New Zealand. The regulations are a direct response to the Australian and New Zealand Governments’ Memorandum of Understanding on Business Law Coordination and will facilitate the mutual recognition of director disqualifications between the two countries, thereby promoting a coordinated approach to corporate law enforcement. The scope of application is initially limited to New Zealand, but the framework is designed to accommodate additional foreign jurisdictions in the future. The amendment will come into effect on the day after the regulations are registered.

Key Provisions

The Corporations Amendment Regulations 2009 (No. 2) primarily amend the Corporations Regulations 2001 by introducing a provision that designates New Zealand as a foreign jurisdiction under the Corporations Act 2001 (the Act). This change is implemented through the insertion of a new entry into the table of prescribed foreign jurisdictions listed in the Regulations (Regulation 3). This amendment ensures that individuals disqualified by a court order or by operation of the law in New Zealand from managing companies there are also automatically disqualified from managing corporations in Australia (subsection 206B(7) of the Act). Under these regulations, any individual who is disqualified from managing companies in New Zealand is subject to the same disqualification in Australia. This requirement applies to all directors and other persons in a similar position, ensuring consistency and integrity across both jurisdictions. The regulations do not specify detailed procedural requirements for the implementation of this disqualification but rely on the existing framework within the Corporations Act to enforce these disqualifications. The regulations impose obligations on entities to ensure that any disqualified person does not manage corporations in Australia. This includes verifying the disqualification status of individuals before appointing them to management positions. Failure to comply with these obligations could result in significant legal and financial repercussions for the entities involved. For breaches of the regulations, there are both civil and criminal consequences. Under the Corporations Act, individuals found to be in breach of the disqualification provisions can face civil penalty provisions, which may include fines up to $210,000 for individuals and $1,050,000 for bodies corporate (subsection 1317E). Additionally, criminal penalties can apply, with maximum fines of up to $210,000 for individuals and $1,050,000 for bodies corporate, along with potential imprisonment terms, as prescribed under the Act.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Corporate Law & Governance
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Regulatory Standards
Prohibited Conduct
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.