STATUTORY RULES.
1934. No. 78.
_________
REGULATIONS UNDER THE COPYRIGHT ACT 1912-1933.
I, THE Governor-General in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby make the following Regulation under the Copyright Act 1912-1933.
Dated this fourth day of July, 1934.
ISAAC A. ISAACS
Governor-General,
By His Excellency’s Command,
A. J. McLACHLAN
Acting Attorney-General.
____________
Amendment of Copyright Regulations 1913.
(Statutory Rules 1913, No. 338.)
1. After regulation 17 of the Copyright Regulations 1913 the following regulation is inserted:—
Arbitration proceedings.
“17a.—(1.) Where a dispute has been submitted to arbitration in pursuance of section 13a of the Copyright Act 1912-1933, the arbitration proceedings shall, subject to that section and to this regulation, be conducted according to the laws relating to arbitration in force in the State or part of the Commonwealth in which the arbitration takes place.
(2.) The provisions of the laws referred to in the last preceding sub-regulation shall apply in relation to the arbitration as if it were an arbitration within this meaning of those laws.”.
_________________________________________________________________________________
Notified in the Commonwealth Gazette on 12th July, 1934.
______________
By Authority: L. F. Johnston, Commonwealth Government Printer, Canberra.
1712.—Price 3d.
Overview
The Statutory Rules 1934, No. 78, represent Regulations under the Copyright Act 1912-1933, made by the Governor-General in Council, which were enacted to address the need for specific procedures to govern arbitration proceedings in matters related to copyright disputes. This legislative instrument was introduced to ensure that arbitration processes, when engaged under section 13a of the Copyright Act 1912-1933, are conducted in alignment with the existing arbitration laws of the relevant State or Commonwealth part where the arbitration takes place. The overarching aim of these regulations was to provide a clear framework for arbitration proceedings, ensuring that they are governed by established legal principles, thereby providing a structured and fair process for resolving copyright disputes. This regulation, introduced by the Commonwealth Parliament, seeks to maintain consistency and predictability in the resolution of copyright-related issues through arbitration.
Scope and Application
The Copyright Regulations 1934, made under the Copyright Act 1912-1933, apply to any arbitration proceedings submitted in accordance with section 13a of the Act, thereby extending the application of the Act to cover disputes resolved through arbitration. The Regulations specify that such arbitration proceedings must be conducted in accordance with the laws relating to arbitration in force in the state or part of the Commonwealth where the arbitration takes place. This regulation ensures that the arbitration process follows the specific legal frameworks governing arbitration within the jurisdiction, thereby integrating arbitration as a formal part of the copyright dispute resolution mechanism. The Regulations do not explicitly state exclusions, but they do specify that the arbitration proceedings are subject to the terms of the Act and the regulation itself. The application of these Regulations is confined to the Commonwealth of Australia and any territories governed under the Commonwealth's legal framework, thus ensuring a consistent approach to arbitration across different jurisdictions within Australia.
Key Provisions
The operative sections of these regulations (Regulation 17a) introduce a new rule concerning arbitration proceedings in disputes related to copyright under the Copyright Act 1912-1933. Specifically, Regulation 17a(1) mandates that any arbitration proceedings initiated in accordance with section 13a of the Act must follow the laws governing arbitration in the particular State or part of the Commonwealth where the arbitration is conducted. Regulation 17a(2) further clarifies that the provisions of the relevant arbitration laws must be applied as if the arbitration were a domestic arbitration under those laws.
These regulations impose several obligations on the parties involved in arbitration proceedings under the Act. Firstly, parties must ensure that the arbitration is conducted in accordance with the laws of the relevant jurisdiction. This includes adhering to procedural rules, timelines, and other legal requirements that govern arbitration in that jurisdiction. Secondly, parties must treat the arbitration as if it were a domestic arbitration for the purposes of applying the relevant arbitration laws. This means that any provisions, rights, and obligations that apply to domestic arbitrations must be equally applicable to arbitrations under these regulations.
Breaching the provisions of these regulations can have legal consequences. While the regulations do not explicitly state offences or penalties, failure to comply with the requirements for conducting arbitration proceedings could potentially lead to the arbitration being declared invalid or unenforceable. This could result in the parties having to resolve their dispute through other means, such as litigation. Additionally, if the arbitration is conducted improperly, the outcome of the arbitration may be challenged on the grounds of procedural unfairness or bias, which could further complicate the resolution of the dispute.
In summary, Regulation 17a requires arbitration proceedings under the Copyright Act to follow the laws of the relevant jurisdiction and to be treated as domestic arbitrations for the purposes of applying those laws. Parties must ensure compliance with these requirements to avoid potential legal challenges and to uphold the integrity of the arbitration process. While specific penalties are not stated, non-compliance could lead to the arbitration being deemed invalid or unenforceable.