EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Comptroller‑General of Customs Instrument of Approval No. 19 of 2015
Customs Act 1901
Section 4A of the Customs Act 1901 (the Customs Act), in part, allows the Comptroller‑General of Customs to approve a statement in writing for a purpose under that Act and provides for a statement so approved to be a disallowable instrument for the purposes of section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (see subsections 4A(1A) and (2)). A disallowable instrument approved under section 4A(2) of the Customs Act is declared to be a legislative instrument by operation of subparagraph 6(d)(i) of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (the Legislative Instruments Act).
The Instrument, titled the “Comptroller‑General of Customs Instrument of Approval No. 19 of 2015 (the New Instrument), is a legislative instrument made under subsection 4A(1A) of the Customs Act and sets the information to be collected in accordance with section 71L of that Act.
Background
Section 68 of the Customs Act requires all imported goods to be entered for home consumption or warehousing and lists goods that are not subject to the requirement (including those that do not meet the entry threshold value. In particular, subsections 68(3A) and (3B) provide for the entry of goods for home consumption, and warehousing, to be made by communicating an import declaration and warehouse declaration in respect of those goods.
Section 71A of the Customs Act sets the requirements that must be satisfied to make an importation declaration for goods to which section 68 of that Act applies and goods that are warehoused goods that are intended to be entered for home consumption. Similarly, section 71DH sets the requirements that must be satisfied to make a warehouse declaration for goods to which section 68 of that Act applies that are intended to be entered for warehousing. A declaration so collected for the purpose of subsection 68(3A) or (3B) is defined to mean an import entry under section 4 of the Customs Act.
Under subsection 71F(1) of the Customs Act provides that, at any time after an import entry is communicated to the Department and before the goods to which it relates are dealt with in accordance with the entry, a withdrawal of the entry may be communicated to the Department by document or electronically. Further subsection 71F(2) provides that if, at any time after a person has communicated an import entry to the Department and before the goods are dealt with in accordance with the entry, the person changes information included in the entry, the person is taken, at the time when the import entry advice is given or communicated in respect of the altered entry, to have withdrawn the entry as it previously stood.
Under subsection 71F(6) of the Customs Act, a withdrawal of an import entry is effected when it is, or is taken under section 71L of that Act to have been, communicated to the Department.
Relevantly, subsection 71L(1) provides that an import entry, a withdrawal of an import entry, a visual examination application, a movement application, or a return, for the purposes of subsections 69(8) or 70(7) or section 105C that is communicated to the Department electronically must communicate such information as set out in an approved statement.
Additionally, subsection 71L(3) of the Customs Act provides that, for the purposes of [that] Act, an import entry, a withdrawal of an import entry or a return for the purposes of subsection 69(8) or 70(7) or section 105C of that Act, is taken to have been communicated to the Department electronically when an import entry advice, or an acknowledgment of the withdrawal or the return, is communicated by a Collector electronically to the person identified in the import entry, withdrawal or return as the person sending it.
The communication of the approved statement is made electronically through the Integrated Cargo System.
The previous Instrument, titled ‘CEO Instrument of Approval No. 71 of 2005’ (the previous Instrument), approved a statement under subsection 4A(1A) of the Customs Act for the purpose of communicating electronically the withdrawal of an import entry in accordance with section 71L of that Act.
Previously, this information was required to be communicated to the Australian Customs and Border Protection Service (the ACBPS). With the disestablishment of the ACBPS and the integration of its functions into the Department of Immigration and Border Protection (the Department), relevant provisions were amended by the Customs and Other Legislation (Australian Border Force) Act 2015 so that relevant information is now required to be communicated to the Department.
The previous Instrument sunsetted on 1 October 2015 by operation of section 50 of the Legislative Instruments Act and ceased to have any effect on that date. As a result, the New Instrument is necessary to maintain the collection of relevant information in accordance with subsection 71L of the Customs Act.
Instrument
The New Instrument approves the new “WITHDRAWAL OF A DECLARATION” statement as an approved statement for the purposes of communicating electronically with the Department the withdrawal of an import entry in accordance with section 71L of the Customs Act.
The purpose of this instrument is to address the effect of sunsetting under section 50 of the Legislative Instruments Act and to maintain the collection of information in accordance with a requirement under section 71L of the Customs Act. The New Instrument does not change the scope of information collected for the purposes of the relevant provision.
A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights has been completed for the New Instrument in accordance with the requirement in paragraph 26(f) of the Legislative Instruments Act, and is at Attachment A.
Consultation
No consultation was undertaken under section 17 of the Legislative Instruments Act before this instrument was made as it is of a minor or machinery nature and does not substantially alter existing arrangements.
Commencement
The instrument commences on 1 October 2015.
ATTACHMENT A
Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights
Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human
Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011
Comptroller‑General of Customs Instrument of Approval No. 19 of 2015
This legislative instrument is compatible with human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.
Overview of the Legislative Instrument
This Legislative Instrument (the New Instrument) replaces the previous “CEO Instrument of Approval No. 71 of 2005” (the previous Instrument) and is made under subsection 4A(1A) of the Customs Act 1901 (the Customs Act).
The New Instrument sets out information that was specified in the previous Instrument, and maintains the collection of commercial and personal information in accordance with a requirement under section 71L of the Customs Act.
Consistent with the previous Instrument, the collection of information relates to import entries communicated to the Department in accordance with section 71A and 71DH of the Customs Act
Section 68 of the Customs Act requires all imported goods to be entered for home consumption or warehousing and lists goods that are not subject to the requirement (including those that do not meet the entry threshold value. In particular, subsections 68(3A) and (3B) provide for the entry of goods for home consumption, and warehousing, to be made by communicating an import declaration and warehouse declaration in respect of those goods.
Section 71A of the Customs Act sets the requirements that must be satisfied to make an importation declaration for goods to which section 68 of that Act applies and goods that are warehoused goods that are intended to be entered for home consumption. Similarly, section 71DH sets the requirements that must be satisfied to make a warehouse declaration for goods to which section 68 of that Act applies that are intended to be entered for warehousing. A declaration so collected for the purpose of subsection 68(3A) or (3B) is defined to mean an import entry under section 4 of the Customs Act.
Under subsection 71F(1) of the Customs Act provides that, at any time after an import entry is communicated to the Department and before the goods to which it relates are dealt with in accordance with the entry, a withdrawal of the entry may be communicated to the Department by document or electronically. Further subsection 71F(2) provides that if, at any time after a person has communicated an import entry to the Department and before the goods are dealt with in accordance with the entry, the person changes information included in the entry, the person is taken, at the time when the import entry advice is given or communicated in respect of the altered entry, to have withdrawn the entry as it previously stood.
Under subsection 71F(6) of the Customs Act, a withdrawal of an import entry is effected when it is, or is taken under section 71L of that Act to have been, communicated to the Department.
Relevantly, subsection 71L(1) provides that an import entry, a withdrawal of an import entry, a visual examination application, a movement application, or a return, for the purposes of subsections 69(8) or 70(7) or section 105C that is communicated to the Department electronically must communicate such information as set out in an approved statement.
Additionally, subsection 71L(3) of the Customs Act provides that, for the purposes of [that] Act, an import entry, a withdrawal of an import entry or a return for the purposes of subsection 69(8) or 70(7) or section 105C of that Act, is taken to have been communicated to the Department electronically when an import entry advice, or an acknowledgment of the withdrawal or the return, is communicated by a Collector electronically to the person identified in the import entry, withdrawal or return as the person sending it.
The communication of the approved statement is made electronically through the Integrated Cargo System.
The New Instrument is necessary to maintain the collection of information in accordance with relevant provisions of the Customs Act because the previous Instrument had sunsetted on 1 October 2015 by operation of section 50 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 and ceased to have effect on that date.
Human Rights Implications
The New Instrument engages Article 17 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (the ICCPR).
Article 17 of the ICCPR prohibits unlawful or arbitrary interferences with a person’s privacy. It also prohibits unlawful attacks on a person’s honour or reputation. It provides that persons have the right to protection of the law against such interference or attacks. An interference with privacy will not be arbitrary if it is authorised by law or consistent with the provisions, aims and objectives of the ICCPR and reasonable in the circumstances. Reasonableness, in this context, incorporates notions of proportionality, appropriateness and necessity. In essence, this will require that limitations:
- serve a legitimate objective
- adopt a means that is rationally connected to that objective, and
- the means adopted are not more restrictive than they need to be to achieve that objective.
Article 17 of the ICCPR is engaged by the New Instrument because it maintains the collection of commercial and personal information required for the purpose of section 71L of the Customs Act. The information collected is used to administer Australian laws (including customs laws) and its collection is authorised by law. The New Instrument does not seek to affect or negate any of the existing protections under Australian laws. Where relevant, information collected may be disclosed to other agencies to enable their administration of their legislation.
As the collection of information is authorised by Australian laws, and the New Instrument does not seek to affect or negate any of the existing protections, the collection of information is lawful and does not cause arbitrary interference.
Conclusion
This New Instrument is compatible with human rights as, although it engages the right to privacy, it maintains all existing protections contained in Australian law and does not seek to limit the right to privacy in anyway.
Roman Quaedvlieg
Comptroller‑General of Customs