Competition and Consumer Act 2010 - Consumer Protection Notice No. 2 of 2012 - Compulsory Recall of Consumer Goods: Teeth Whitening Products Supplied by Pro Teeth Whitening (Aust) Pty Limited

Administered by Department of the Treasury

Legislation au F2012L00189 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Competition and Consumer Act 2010

 

Consumer Protection Notice No. 2 of 2012

 

COMPULSORY RECALL OF CONSUMER GOODS: TEETH WHITENING PRODUCTS SUPPLIED BY PRO TEETH WHITENING (AUST) PTY LIMITED

 

Issued by the authority of the Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasurer responsible for Competition Policy and Consumer Affairs

 

Subsection 122 (1) of Schedule 2 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 provides that the Minister responsible for Competition Policy and Consumer Affairs may issue a compulsory recall notice for consumer goods of a particular kind when it appears to him that:

-       the goods will or may cause injury to any person, and

-       the supplier has not taken satisfactory action to prevent the goods causing injury to any person.

 

Background

Teeth whitening has become a common cosmetic procedure and numerous products are available directly to the public for do-it-yourself (DIY) teeth whitening. The concentrations of bleaching ingredients in DIY teeth whitening products available in Australia have increased over recent years. A common active bleaching ingredient in these products is hydrogen peroxide.

 

Typical injury complaints from teeth whitening kits include tooth sensitivity and gum and throat irritation. More serious injuries reported include:

-       painful chemical burns to the gums, mouth tissues and the oesophagus

-       blistering or ulceration of the mouth and throat

-       marbled or unnatural coloured teeth

-       sensitive and painful teeth, tissue “tingling”, and headaches

-       potential increased risk of mouth and tongue cancer for tobacco users.

The Australian Dental Association has also reported that dentists are seeing an increasing number of patients presenting with mouth injuries attributed to at-home teeth bleaching. Some cases have also been treated in emergency departments of hospitals. Poisons Information Centres in Queensland, New South Wales and Victoria have received a combined total of at least 58 reports of injuries involving teeth whiteners since 2004.

 

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) is also aware of regulatory action being taken in the European Union, as well as overseas injury reports associated with the use of these products.

In Australia, the Poisons Standard 2011 classifies preparations containing more than 6% hydrogen peroxide as Schedule 6 “POISONS”.  This classification limits DIY consumer products intended to be taken into the mouth to this concentration.

The 6% hydrogen peroxide safety limit for DIY teeth whiteners is also supported by expert clinical advice published by the Dental Board of Australia, the Australian Dental Association, and a scientific risk assessment published by the European Union Scientific Committee on Consumer Products.

In early December 2011, the ACCC contacted the known suppliers of DIY teeth whiteners and advised them of safety concerns in relation to DIY teeth whitening products that contained unsafe concentrations of bleaching agents.

Most suppliers of DIY teeth whitening products that contained unsafe concentrations of bleaching agents immediately ceased supply of the products and voluntarily recalled them.

Conditions for Issuing the Compulsory Recall Notice Have Been Met

The Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasurer has determined that

“bright white express - Advanced Teeth Whitening Kit” and “PROTEETHWHITENING - Professional Teeth Whitening Pen”

 

(the Products)

 

supplied by Pro Teeth Whitening (Aust) Pty Limited, are consumer goods supplied in trade and commerce and it appears to him that

-       the goods will or may cause injury to a person; and

-       the supplier has not taken satisfactory action to prevent the goods causing injury to any person.

 

Consultation

The ACCC first wrote to Pro Teeth Whitening (Aust) Pty Limited on 12 December 2011 informing them of the safety concerns about DIY teeth whitening products containing concentrations of hydrogen peroxide greater than 6%.

Correspondence from Pro Teeth Whitening (Aust) Pty Limited subsequently confirmed that the Products were supplied by the company and contained concentrations of hydrogen peroxide greater than 6% and in the range from 9% to 16%.

The ACCC contacted Pro Teeth Whitening (Aust) Pty Limited on several occasions during December 2011 and January 2012 and explained the basis for the safety concerns and the obligations for suppliers of consumer goods under the Competition and Consumer Act 2010. 

The ACCC also informed Pro Teeth Whitening (Aust) Pty Limited that the Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasurer could exercise his powers under the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 to protect consumers and that these powers included ordering a compulsory product safety recall.

Pro Teeth Whitening (Aust) Pty Limited did not cease to supply the Products or recall the Products on a voluntary basis, despite the ACCC approaching the company on a number of separate occasions.

Pursuant to subsection 132J (1)(b) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 the Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasurer certified, by Consumer Protection Notice 1 of 2012, that a recall notice for the Products should be issued without delay, and without a conference process, as it appeared to him that such goods created an imminent risk of serious injury.  A notice under section 132J of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 is not a legislative instrument.

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011

Overview

The Legislative Instrument orders a compulsory recall of certain ‘do-it-yourself’ teeth whitening products that contain concentrations of hydrogen peroxide greater than 6% w/w.  High concentrations of hydrogen peroxide in a DIY consumer good intended to be taken into the mouth may cause serious injury to consumers.

 

Human Rights Implications

The legislative Instrument engages the right to health and the rights of the child.

The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights recognises the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health.

The Convention on the Rights of the Child recognises the right of the child to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health.

The Legislative Instrument promotes these rights by requiring a supplier to recall particular consumer goods which will or may cause harm or injury to people, including children.  The effect of recalling a good is to remove it from sale and to notify consumers who have purchased the good that it should be returned to the supplier.

Conclusion

The Legislative Instrument does not limit human rights and is compatible with human rights because it advances the protection of human rights by requiring a supplier to recall particular consumer goods that will or may cause harm or injury to people, including children.

 

 

Details of the Legislative Instrument as Set Out in the Schedule to Consumer Protection Notice No. 2 of 2012

 

Division 1: Provides details of the supplier of the goods subject to the compulsory recall notice, namely:

Pro Teeth Whitening (Aust) Pty Limited

ACN 135 042 107

Unit 3, 16 Mary Street, Birkdale Qld 4159

 

Division 2: Provides particulars of the goods subject to the compulsory recall notice, namely:

“bright white express - Advanced Teeth Whitening Kit” and

“PROTEETH WHITENING - Professional Teeth Whitening Pen”

 

Division 3: Directs that the supplier must take action within three (3) days of the recall notice being registered on the Federal Register of Legislative Instruments.

 

Division 4: Directs the manner in which the recall is to be conducted by the supplier.

Overview

The Competition and Consumer Act 2010, enacted to enhance consumer protection and market fairness, was introduced to address significant gaps in consumer safety and fair trading practices. This Act, administered by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), empowers the government to take decisive action against misleading or deceptive conduct and ensure that consumer goods are safe for use. In this context, Consumer Protection Notice No. 2 of 2012 was issued by the Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasurer responsible for Competition Policy and Consumer Affairs, aimed at addressing the serious health risks associated with the use of certain do-it-yourself teeth whitening products. These products, supplied by Pro Teeth Whitening (Aust) Pty Limited, contained unsafe concentrations of hydrogen peroxide, leading to severe injuries such as chemical burns, gum irritation, and potential long-term health risks. The policy objective was to compel the supplier to recall these products to protect consumers from harm, thereby fulfilling the Act's mandate to safeguard consumer health and safety.

Scope and Application

The Consumer Protection Notice No. 2 of 2012, issued under the authority of the Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasurer responsible for Competition Policy and Consumer Affairs, mandates the compulsory recall of certain consumer goods, specifically "bright white express - Advanced Teeth Whitening Kit" and "PROTEETH WHITENING - Professional Teeth Whitening Pen," supplied by Pro Teeth Whitening (Aust) Pty Limited. The notice applies to these particular products due to the significant risk they pose to consumers, as they contain concentrations of hydrogen peroxide exceeding the safe limit of 6%, leading to potential injuries such as chemical burns, gum irritation, and other serious health issues. The notice is issued pursuant to subsection 122(1) of Schedule 2 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010, reflecting the need to protect public health by requiring the supplier to take immediate action to prevent these goods from causing harm. The recall is geographically applicable within Australia, affecting trade and commerce where these specific products are supplied. There are no stated exclusions or exemptions in this notice; it is specifically targeted at the identified products from the mentioned supplier, and it mandates their immediate recall to safeguard consumer health and safety.

Key Provisions

The primary sections of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 relevant to this notice are sections 122 and 132J. Section 122(1) empowers the Minister to issue a compulsory recall notice for consumer goods that pose a risk of injury if the supplier has not taken sufficient action to mitigate this risk. Section 132J(1)(b) allows the Minister to issue a recall notice immediately without a conference if the goods pose an imminent risk of serious injury. The Consumer Protection Notice No. 2 of 2012 applies these sections to the specific teeth whitening products supplied by Pro Teeth Whitening (Aust) Pty Limited, due to their unsafe hydrogen peroxide concentrations. The Act imposes several obligations on Pro Teeth Whitening (Aust) Pty Limited, primarily to recall the specified products immediately upon the notice being registered. The company must cease supplying these products and ensure they are removed from sale. Furthermore, they must inform consumers who have purchased these products that they should return them to the supplier. This requirement extends to notifying all known retailers of the recall and advising them to remove the products from their shelves. Pro Teeth Whitening (Aust) Pty Limited must also provide detailed information to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) about the recall actions taken, including the methods used to reach affected consumers and retailers. Failure to comply with the compulsory recall notice can result in significant legal consequences. Under section 132K of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010, any person who contravenes a compulsory recall notice can face a penalty. For a body corporate, the maximum penalty is 500 penalty units, which is approximately AUD 110,000 as of 2023. This penalty underscores the seriousness of non-compliance and the importance of adhering to the Act's requirements to protect consumer safety. Additionally, continued supply of the unsafe products could also lead to civil actions for damages by affected consumers who suffer injury due to the supplier's failure to comply with the recall notice.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Consumer Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Offence Provisions
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Prohibited Conduct

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.