STATUTORY RULES
1967 No. 28
REGULATION UNDER THE COMMONWEALTH SERUM LABORATORIES ACT 1961-1966.*
I, THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL, in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby make the following Regulation under the Commonwealth Serum Laboratories Act 1961-1966.
Dated this ninth day of March, 1967.
CASEY
Governor-General.
By His Excellency’s Command,
Minister of State for Health.
Amendment of the Commonwealth Serum Laboratories Regulations†
The Schedule.
The Schedule to the Commonwealth Serum Laboratories Regulations is amended by adding at the end of Item 5 the following sub-item:—
“(5.) Pituitary hormones”.
* Notified in the Commonwealth Gazette on 1967.
† Statutory Rules 1901, No. 134 as amended by Statutory Rules 1962, No. 115; 1964, Nos. 86 and 136; and 1965, No. 148.
By Authority: A. J. ARTHUR, Commonwealth Government Printer, Canberra
288/67—Price 5c 10/19.1.1967
Overview
The Commonwealth Serum Laboratories Regulations 1967 were enacted under the authority of the Commonwealth Serum Laboratories Act 1961-1966. These regulations were designed to address the need for specific updates in the scope of activities overseen by the Commonwealth Serum Laboratories, particularly concerning the regulation of pituitary hormones. The regulation was made by the Governor-General, acting on advice from the Federal Executive Council, and notifies the addition of pituitary hormones to the existing list of regulated items under the Act. This legislative instrument aims to ensure that the Commonwealth Serum Laboratories can effectively monitor and regulate new substances in line with the broader objectives of public health and safety as outlined in the primary Act.
Scope and Application
The Commonwealth Serum Laboratories Act 1961-1966 applies to the operations and activities of the Commonwealth Serum Laboratories (CSL), which is an entity involved in the production and supply of biological products and vaccines in Australia. This legislation establishes the framework for the governance, administration, and regulation of CSL's operations. The Act pertains to the production, testing, quality control, and distribution of biological products, which includes serums, vaccines, and other related substances. The geographic reach of this legislation is primarily within the Commonwealth of Australia, as it governs the activities of CSL, a federal entity. The Commonwealth Serum Laboratories Regulations 1967, made under this Act, further refine the application by detailing specific requirements for the manufacture and distribution of biological products, including amendments to include pituitary hormones in the list of regulated substances. These regulations extend the application of the Act by providing detailed operational standards and procedures that CSL must adhere to, thus ensuring compliance with national health and safety standards.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of this Regulation, as detailed in the Schedule, pertain to the amendment of the Commonwealth Serum Laboratories Regulations, specifically adding a new sub-item under Item 5, which now includes "pituitary hormones" (Schedule). This addition expands the scope of the previously regulated substances to encompass pituitary hormones, thereby subjecting them to the regulatory framework established by the Commonwealth Serum Laboratories Act 1961-1966.
This amendment imposes obligations on parties or entities governed by the Act to comply with the expanded regulatory requirements for pituitary hormones. These obligations include adhering to the standards and conditions set forth in the Act and its Regulations for the production, distribution, and use of these hormones. This may involve obtaining necessary licenses, ensuring quality control measures are in place, and reporting any relevant activities to the appropriate authorities.
Failure to comply with the provisions of the Act and its Regulations, including the new requirements for pituitary hormones, can result in various consequences. These may include administrative penalties, such as fines, or more severe legal actions. For example, if an entity fails to obtain the necessary licenses or does not adhere to quality control standards, they may face fines or other administrative penalties. In more serious cases, persistent or egregious non-compliance could lead to criminal charges, with potential penalties including imprisonment, as stipulated by the Act. The specific penalties and consequences depend on the nature and severity of the breach.