STATUTORY RULES.
1904. No. 66.
PROVISIONAL REGULATION UNDER THE COMMONWEALTH PUBLIC SERVICE ACT 1902.
I, THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby certify that, on account of urgency, the following Regulation under the Commonwealth Public Service Act 1902 should come into immediate operation, and make the Regulation to come into operation forthwith as a provisional Regulation.
Dated this twelfth day of October, One thousand nine hundred and four.
NORTHCOTE,
Governor-General.
By His Excellency’s Command,
DUGALD THOMSON.
Repeal of portion of Regulation 229.
The words “Persons registered shall only be eligible for appointment in the State in which they have been examined,” in Regulation 229 of the Regulations under the Commonwealth Public Service Act 1902, published in the Gazette on the 23rd day of December, 1902, are hereby repealed.
By Authority: Robt. S. Brain, Government Printer, Melbourne.
C.10582.—Price 3d.
Overview
The Commonwealth Public Service Act 1902 was enacted to provide a comprehensive framework for the management of the public service within Australia, addressing the need for a structured and efficient system to manage federal employees. The Act aimed to ensure that public service appointments and operations were conducted in a fair, transparent, and merit-based manner. In 1904, a provisional regulation was introduced to further refine the implementation of the Act. This regulation, issued under the authority of the Governor-General, was created in response to an urgent need to amend the eligibility criteria for public service appointments as outlined in Regulation 229. The regulation specifically repealed the provision that restricted registered individuals to appointments only in the state where they were examined, thereby broadening the scope of employment opportunities across different states. This was enacted by the Federal Executive Council and aimed to improve the flexibility and efficiency of the public service recruitment process.
Scope and Application
The Provisional Regulation under the Commonwealth Public Service Act 1902, published as Statutory Rule No. 66, pertains to the eligibility of certain individuals for appointments within the Commonwealth Public Service. Specifically, the regulation addresses and repeals the restriction in Regulation 229, which previously required that persons registered for appointments be eligible only in the state where they were examined. This change eliminates the geographical limitation on where these individuals could be appointed, thereby broadening their eligibility across the entire Commonwealth. The regulation applies to all persons registered under the Commonwealth Public Service Act, effectively removing barriers that restricted their employment to specific states. The regulation's impact extends nationwide, ensuring that qualified individuals can be appointed to public service roles irrespective of the state in which they were examined. The regulation does not specify exclusions or exemptions, but it is noted that the scope of application is limited to the amendment of Regulation 229 and does not extend to other provisions of the Act unless further specified by subsequent legislative instruments.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of this provisional regulation focus on altering the eligibility criteria for public service appointments under the Commonwealth Public Service Act 1902. Specifically, section 2 of the regulation repeals the phrase in Regulation 229 that restricted eligible candidates to the state where they were examined. This change broadens the scope for public service appointments by allowing individuals registered in one state to be considered for positions in other states, thus enhancing the flexibility of the public service recruitment process (section 2).
The Act imposes obligations on entities and individuals involved in the public service appointments to comply with the updated eligibility criteria. Public service agencies must now consider candidates who are registered in states other than where the vacancy exists, provided they meet the necessary qualifications and standards. This change necessitates adjustments in the recruitment and selection processes to ensure that they are inclusive and do not inadvertently exclude qualified candidates from other states.
There are no specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences mentioned for breaches of this regulation. However, any failure to comply with the updated provisions could lead to administrative issues, potential legal challenges, or a review of the recruitment practices by the relevant authorities. The absence of explicit penalties suggests that non-compliance would primarily be addressed through internal administrative processes and adherence to the new regulatory framework.