STATUTORY RULES.
1933. No. 44.
––––––
REGULATIONS UNDER THE COMMONWEALTH PUBLIC SERVICE ACT 1922-1932.
THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS appointed under the Commonwealth Public Service Act 1922-1932, in pursuance and exercise of the authority conferred upon it by the said Act, and subject to the approval of the Governor-General, hereby makes the following Regulation, to come into operation forthwith.
Dated this twenty-third day of March, 1933.
W. J CLEMENS
Commissioner.
Approved in Executive Council this fifth day of April, 1933.
ISAAC A. ISAACS
Governor-General.
By His Excellency’s Command,
C. W. C. MARR
for Prime Minister.
Amendments of Commonwealth Public Service Regulations.
(Statutory Rules 1926, No. 212, as amended to this date.)
Regulation 157 is amended by omitting from sub-regulation (2.) the words:—
“Provided that a candidate for the position of Telegraph Messenger shall be held to be qualified for appointment if he passes in Handwriting and obtains half the full marks for Spelling, but his order of merit shall be determined by the number of marks obtained for Spelling and Arithmetic.”
By Authority: L. F. Johnston, Commonwealth Government Printer, Canberra.
870.—Price 3d.
Overview
The Statutory Rules 1933, No. 44, are Regulations made under the Commonwealth Public Service Act 1922-1932 by the Board of Commissioners, subject to the approval of the Governor-General. This legislative instrument was introduced to address and amend the existing Commonwealth Public Service Regulations, particularly focusing on the qualifications and selection criteria for candidates applying for positions such as Telegraph Messengers. The enactment by the Board of Commissioners and subsequent approval by the Governor-General, Isaac Isaacs, ensures the regulations are in line with the legislative framework of the Commonwealth Public Service Act. The objective of these amendments is to refine the criteria for candidate selection, emphasising the importance of certain skills and qualifications for specific roles within the public service.
The amendments, as outlined in the Statutory Rules, specifically modify Regulation 157 by altering the qualification requirements for candidates applying for the position of Telegraph Messenger. The changes eliminate the previous provision that allowed candidates to be considered for appointment if they passed in Handwriting and achieved half the marks for Spelling, with their order of merit based on Spelling and Arithmetic. This adjustment aims to ensure that the selection process is fair and adequately assesses the necessary skills for the role, thereby improving the overall efficiency and effectiveness of the public service.
Scope and Application
The Regulations under the Commonwealth Public Service Act 1922-1932, enacted by the Board of Commissioners and approved by the Governor-General, encompass a broad array of administrative and procedural adjustments to the Commonwealth Public Service Regulations. These regulations apply to all personnel within the Commonwealth Public Service, including those employed in various roles such as Telegraph Messengers, and extend to any administrative actions, appointments, and qualifications stipulated under the overarching Act. The scope of these regulations is primarily focused on ensuring that the operations of the Commonwealth Public Service are conducted in an efficient and equitable manner. This includes defining qualifications and conditions of employment, as evidenced by the amendment to Regulation 157, which pertains to the appointment of Telegraph Messengers and modifies the criteria for their assessment in handwriting, spelling, and arithmetic. These regulations are applicable on a national level across all jurisdictions within Australia, thereby ensuring uniformity in the public service's operational standards. While the Act itself does not explicitly state exclusions or exemptions, the specific regulations within the Act may contain certain provisions that delineate exceptions based on particular roles or circumstances. The application and interpretation of these regulations can be further extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, which are subject to the overarching framework provided by the Commonwealth Public Service Act.
Key Provisions
The primary operative sections of these Regulations involve amendments to the Commonwealth Public Service Regulations, specifically to Regulation 157. Regulation 157, which concerns the qualifications for candidates applying for the position of Telegraph Messenger, has been amended by removing the provision that allowed a candidate to be considered for the role if they passed in Handwriting and obtained half the full marks for Spelling. Furthermore, it specifies that the order of merit for such candidates was determined by the number of marks obtained for Spelling and Arithmetic (Regulation 157(2)). These changes mean that the previous qualification criteria for Telegraph Messenger positions no longer apply.
The obligations and requirements imposed by these Regulations on the parties or entities they govern primarily involve the updating of qualification criteria for the role of Telegraph Messenger within the Commonwealth Public Service. This amendment ensures that all candidates for this position are evaluated based on the same criteria moving forward, with no special dispensation for passing only in Handwriting and obtaining half the marks for Spelling. The Board of Commissioners, under the authority of the Commonwealth Public Service Act 1922-1932, must enforce these changes to ensure consistency and fairness in the selection process for Telegraph Messenger positions.
In terms of offences, penalties, or consequences for breaches, the Regulations themselves do not explicitly outline specific penalties for non-compliance. However, any failure to adhere to the updated qualification criteria for Telegraph Messenger positions could potentially lead to disputes or legal challenges regarding the fairness and legality of the selection process. Such disputes could result in judicial review or other legal actions, although the specific consequences would depend on the outcomes of any such proceedings. The maximum penalties, if applicable, would be determined by the courts based on the nature and severity of the breach.