STATUTORY RULES.
1911. No. 20.
REGULATION UNDER THE COMMONWEALTH PUBLIC SERVICE ACT 1902.
I, THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby make the following Regulation under the Commonwealth Public Service Act 1902 to come into operation forthwith.
Dated the twentieth day of February, One thousand nine hundred and eleven.
DUDLEY,
Governor-General.
By His Excellency’s Command,
KING O’MALLEY,
Minister of State for Home Affairs.
A new Regulation No. 264a in the following terms in hereby made:—
264 a. Where the Chief Officer and the Public Service Inspector are not in agreement as to the personnel of a Board of Inquiry proposed to be appointed, the matter shall be referred to the Commissioner by the Public Service Inspector for determination.
Printed and Published for the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia by J. Kemp, Government Printer for the State of Victoria.
C.3009.—Price 3d.
Overview
The Statutory Rules 1911 No. 20, specifically Regulation No. 264a under the Commonwealth Public Service Act 1902, was enacted in 1911 to address procedural concerns within the Commonwealth Public Service, particularly those related to the appointment of Boards of Inquiry. This legislative instrument was created by the Governor-General in Council, acting on the advice of the Federal Executive Council, and is a demonstration of the Commonwealth's commitment to orderly governance and fair processes within the public service. The policy objective behind this regulation is to ensure that disputes over the personnel of a Board of Inquiry are resolved in a manner that maintains the integrity and fairness of the public service processes. By providing a clear procedure for referral to the Commissioner in cases of disagreement, the regulation aims to prevent potential biases and ensure that decisions are made impartially and in the best interest of the public service.
Scope and Application
This Statutory Rule pertains to the Commonwealth Public Service Act 1902 and serves to provide a specific regulation concerning the establishment of Boards of Inquiry. The rule applies to the personnel of Boards of Inquiry within the Commonwealth public service, focusing on instances where there is a disagreement between the Chief Officer and the Public Service Inspector regarding the composition of such a board. In these cases, the matter is to be referred to the Commissioner for final determination. This regulation is applicable across the Commonwealth, encompassing all federal public service entities and personnel. There are no explicit exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds mentioned within the text of this particular regulation. The scope and application of the regulation are limited to the resolution of disagreements in the composition of Boards of Inquiry, and it does not extend to other aspects of the public service or related matters. The regulation itself does not explicitly mention any subordinate instruments that may further extend or restrict its application.
Key Provisions
The primary operative section of this legislation is Regulation 264a (264a), which stipulates the process to be followed when the Chief Officer and the Public Service Inspector cannot agree on the personnel of a proposed Board of Inquiry. In such instances, the matter is to be referred to the Commissioner by the Public Service Inspector for a final determination. This regulation ensures that there is a clear and defined process for resolving disputes over the composition of the Board of Inquiry, thereby maintaining procedural fairness and consistency within the public service.
The obligations imposed by this Act on the involved parties are clear and specific. The Chief Officer and the Public Service Inspector are required to attempt to reach an agreement on the personnel of any proposed Board of Inquiry. If they are unable to do so, the Public Service Inspector must refer the matter to the Commissioner for resolution. This requirement ensures that there is a structured and accountable process for resolving disputes and that decisions about the composition of Boards of Inquiry are made by a neutral party.
In terms of consequences for non-compliance or breach of this regulation, the legislation does not explicitly outline specific offences, penalties, or consequences. However, it is reasonable to infer that failure to follow the stipulated process could lead to administrative or procedural issues within the public service. The seriousness of such consequences would likely depend on the impact of the non-compliance on the functioning of the public service and the resolution of disputes over Board of Inquiry personnel. Given the procedural nature of this regulation, any breaches may result in internal disciplinary actions or other administrative measures rather than criminal penalties.