STATUTORY RULES.
1925. No. 95.
_____
REGULATIONS UNDER THE COMMONWEALTH PUBLIC SERVICE ACT 1922-1924 (TWENTIETH AMENDMENT, 1925).
THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS appointed under the Commonwealth Public Service Act 1922-1924, in pursuance and exercise of the authority conferred upon it by the said Act and subject to the approval of the Governor-General, hereby makes the following amendment of the Regulations, such amendment to come into operation as from the 1st July, 1924.
Dated this fifth day of June, 1925.
C. B. B. White, Chairman, | | Board of Commissianers. |
W. J. Skewes, Commissioner, |
W. J. Clemens, Deputy Commissioner, |
Approved in Executive Council this tenth day of June, 1925.
FORSTER,
Governor-General.
By His Excellency’s Command,
C. W. C. MARR,
for Prime Minister.
_____
Amendment of Commonwealth Public Service Regulations.
(Statutory Rules 1923, No. 93, as amended to this date.)
Regulation 106 is amended by inserting after Table H in sub-regulation (4) the following additional table:—
TABLE I.
Section: Attorney-General’s Department (excluding Patents and Trade Marks Branch and Copyright Office).
Office. | | Salary. | Remarks. |
| Minimum. | Maximum. | Increments (Annual): |
| | £ | £ | £ | |
Assistant (High Court)........................... | | 258 | 282 | 6 | |
Assistant (Industrial Registrar’s Office)................ | | 240 | 276 | 6 | |
Assistant (Public Service Arbitrator’s Office)............ | | 240 | 276. | 6 | |
Assistant (Records, &c.), Central Staff................ | | 240 | 276 | 6 | |
Assistant (Records, &c.), Investigation Branch, Queensland.. | | 240 | 276 | 6 | |
Assistant (Senate).............................. | | 252 | 288 | 6 | |
Caretaker (Arbitration Court)...................... | | 240 | 258 | 6 | |
Inquiry Officer— | | 312 | | | |
Melbourne................................. | | | |
Brisbane................................... | 348 | 12 | |
Adelaide................................... | | | |
Perth..................................... | | | |
Sydney.................................... | | 348 | 396 | 12 | |
Ministerial Messenger........................... | | 240 | 276 | 6 | |
Stenographer (Industrial Registrar’s Office)............. | | 264 | 294 | 10 | |
_______________________
Printed and Published for the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia by H. J. Green, Government Printer for the State of Victoria.
C.8376.—Price 3d.
Overview
The Regulations under the Commonwealth Public Service Act 1922-1924 (Twentieth Amendment, 1925) (C1925L00095) was enacted to amend the existing regulations governing the Commonwealth Public Service, specifically addressing salary structures and employment conditions. This legislative instrument was introduced to address the need for updating and refining the remuneration and employment terms for various positions within the public service, thereby ensuring alignment with the changing administrative requirements of the time. The Board of Commissioners, authorised under the Commonwealth Public Service Act 1922-1924, drafted these regulations subject to the approval of the Governor-General, which was subsequently granted. The policy objective appears to be the maintenance of a fair and efficient public service through appropriate remuneration and structured employment conditions.
Scope and Application
The Twentieth Amendment to the Regulations under the Commonwealth Public Service Act 1922-1924 pertains to the amendment of the salary scales within the Attorney-General’s Department, excluding specific branches such as the Patents and Trade Marks Branch and the Copyright Office. This amendment applies to various positions within the department, such as Assistants in the High Court, Industrial Registrar’s Office, Public Service Arbitrator’s Office, Records departments, Senate, and other specific roles like Caretakers and Inquiry Officers across different cities. The amendment sets out minimum and maximum salary figures and annual increment rates, ensuring structured remuneration for these roles. The amendment is intended to come into effect from 1 July 1924 and is subject to the approval of the Governor-General. Through these regulations, the Board of Commissioners seeks to standardise and formalise the compensation framework for specified public service roles within the Attorney-General’s Department, thereby affecting the terms and conditions of employment for those involved.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of this legislative instrument (Statutory Rules 1925, No. 95) involve the amendment of the Commonwealth Public Service Regulations under the Commonwealth Public Service Act 1922-1924. Specifically, Regulation 106 is amended by inserting a new Table I (Regulation 106(4)) detailing salary structures for various positions within the Attorney-General’s Department, excluding the Patents and Trade Marks Branch and the Copyright Office. This new table provides minimum and maximum salary figures as well as annual increment details for positions such as Assistant (High Court), Assistant (Industrial Registrar’s Office), Assistant (Public Service Arbitrator’s Office), and others (Regulation 106(4)(a)).
The obligations imposed by these regulations include the requirement for the Board of Commissioners to establish and enforce these salary structures within the specified departments, ensuring that all employees are compensated in accordance with the guidelines set out in the amended Regulation 106. This also mandates that any changes to these salary structures must be approved by the Governor-General, thereby ensuring adherence to the legislative process and maintaining the integrity of public service remuneration.
In terms of consequences for breach, the legislation does not explicitly outline specific offences or penalties within the text provided. However, non-compliance with the stipulated salary structures could potentially lead to legal ramifications under the broader framework of the Commonwealth Public Service Act 1922-1924. Given the nature of the regulations, failure to adhere to these salary guidelines might result in administrative penalties, including possible disciplinary actions against the Board of Commissioners or other implicated entities. The exact nature and severity of these penalties would be determined within the broader legal context provided by the overarching Act.