Commonwealth Police Regulations (Amendment)

Overview

The Statutory Rules 1965 No. 101, made under the Commonwealth Police Act 1957, were enacted to amend the Commonwealth Police Regulations. The regulation specifically adjusts the fine amount for certain appeals under the existing framework, changing the penalty from five pounds to two pounds. This legislative instrument was introduced to address minor administrative adjustments within the existing police regulations, aiming to streamline processes and ensure the regulations remain relevant and effective. Enacted by the Administrator of the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia, Henry Abel Smith, with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, this regulation reflects the policy objective to maintain efficient and fair regulatory practices within the federal police framework. The amendment was notified in the Commonwealth Gazette on 5 August 1965 and authorised by the Commonwealth Government Printer, A. J. Arthur. The regulation was designed to ensure that the Commonwealth Police Regulations remain in line with contemporary legal and administrative standards, addressing a specific gap in the regulatory fines structure without delving into broader legislative changes. This targeted adjustment demonstrates a commitment to maintaining an effective and responsive legal framework for the administration of federal police matters.

Scope and Application

This Statutory Rule, numbered 101 of 1965, represents a regulation under the Commonwealth Police Act 1957, thus impacting the operations and administration of the Commonwealth Police Force. It is applicable to the officers and members of the Commonwealth Police Force, as well as to any individuals or entities that interact with this force in a regulatory or procedural context. The geographic scope of this regulation is nationwide, as it applies to the Commonwealth Police Force, which has jurisdiction across Australia. The amendment affects the financial aspects of certain administrative processes within the Commonwealth Police Force, specifically altering the monetary amount from Five pounds to Two pounds in a particular sub-regulation. This legislative change does not specify any exclusions or exemptions and is effective immediately upon notification, reflecting the administrative adjustments necessary to maintain the efficiency and effectiveness of the Commonwealth Police Force. Subordinate instruments may further extend or restrict the application of these regulations, as deemed necessary by the appropriate authorities.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of the Statutory Rules 1965 No. 101 involve an amendment to Regulation 35 of the Commonwealth Police Regulations (1). Specifically, the amendment modifies sub-regulation (1) by changing the monetary amount from “Five pounds” to “Two pounds.” This alteration likely pertains to fines or fees associated with certain police-related matters or proceedings, though the exact context is not provided in the extract. The amended regulation imposes certain obligations on the entities it governs, particularly in relation to financial penalties. By reducing the amount from Five pounds to Two pounds, the regulation likely seeks to make fines or fees more manageable or to reflect changes in the economic climate or policy objectives (1). These obligations are central to ensuring compliance with the updated financial stipulations within police-related proceedings. In terms of offences, penalties, or consequences, the regulation itself does not explicitly state the specific infractions that would incur the reduced fine or the broader implications of such amendments. However, the amendment could imply that there are specific circumstances or violations where a monetary penalty is applicable, and the updated amount of Two pounds would now be the prescribed fine. The regulation sets out a clear financial consequence for non-compliance with whatever offence or procedural requirement it addresses (1). While the exact nature of the penalties or consequences for breaching the amended regulation is not detailed in the provided text, it is reasonable to infer that failure to comply with the new financial stipulations could lead to legal repercussions. These could include formal penalties or other enforcement actions, depending on the specific context of the regulation and the nature of the breach. The potential for civil or criminal consequences would be determined by the broader legislative framework and case law applicable to the situation (1).