Commonwealth Employees (Redeployment and Retirement) Regulations (Amendment)

Legislation au C2004L04138 Regulations Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

COMMONWEALTH EMPLOYEES (REDEPLOYMENT AND RETIREMENT) REGULATIONS (AMENDMENT)

STATUTORY RULES 1982 NO 302

Issued with the Authority of the Public Service Board

Sub-section 29(2) of the Commonwealth Employees (Redeployment and Retirement) Act 1979 enables the Governor-General to make regulations prescribing all matters which are required or permitted to be prescribed.

Section 7 of the Act provides in part:

‘(1) The objects of this Part are -

(a) 

(b) secondly, to ensure, to the greatest extent that is practicable, that each employee in a Department, and each employee of a prescribed Commonwealth authority, whose services cannot … reasonably be used in the Department or by the authority, as the case may be -

(i)  

(ii) 

(iii) for any other prescribed reason,

is redeployed in the Australian Public Service or in the employment of a prescribed Commonwealth authority on duties which he can reasonably be required to perform.

(2) Regulations prescribing a reason for the purposes of paragraph (1)(b) shall not be made except after consideration by the Governor-General of a report made to the Governor-General by the Public Service Board after consultation by the Public Service Board with the organisations, being organisations representing the interests of employees or a class of employees, prescribed for the purposes of this section.’

The following organisations have been previously prescribed for the purposes of section 7 of the Act:

Australian Council of Trade Unions

Council of Australian Government Employee Organisations

 


Australian Council of Salaried and Professional Associations

Council of Professional Associations

The Council of Australian Government Employee Organisations and the Australian Council of Salaried and Professional Associations subsequently amalgamated with the Australian Council of Trade Unions and throughout the later consultations their views were presented by the Australian Council of Trade Unions.

The proposed regulations provide that an employee may be declared eligible for redeployment for the reason that ‘the employee is inefficient’ or ‘is not qualified to perform his duties’. The regulations define ‘inefficient’ and ‘not qualified’ for the purposes of the regulations.

An employee is defined to be ‘inefficient’ when, in the performance of his normal duties, he has not attained or sustained a standard of efficiency that a person can reasonably be expected to attain or sustain in the performance of those duties. The regulations include certain matters which must and others which may be taken into account in determining whether an employee is inefficient.

An employee is defined to be ‘not qualified to perform his duties’ when, in relation to those duties, he has ceased to hold or has become unable or ineligible to hold or to use and enjoy an essential qualification, or a competent person or body has suspended, cancelled, revoked, rescinded or otherwise withdrawn an essential qualification.

Overview

The Commonwealth Employees (Redeployment and Retirement) Regulations (Amendment) Statutory Rules 1982 were enacted to provide further clarity and detail to the Commonwealth Employees (Redeployment and Retirement) Act 1979. This Act was designed to address the need for a structured approach to the redeployment and retirement of Commonwealth employees who could no longer be effectively utilised in their current roles. The problem it aimed to address was ensuring that employees whose services could not be reasonably utilised in their current positions were redeployed to other roles within the Australian Public Service or by prescribed Commonwealth authorities, where their skills and qualifications could be better matched to the duties required. These regulations were issued with the authority of the Public Service Board, under the authority granted by sub-section 29(2) of the Act, to prescribe necessary matters for effective implementation. The policy objective of these regulations is to support the overarching goals of the Act by providing a clear framework for determining when an employee may be deemed inefficient or unqualified, and thus eligible for redeployment, while ensuring that such determinations are made with due consideration of relevant factors and consultation with employee representative organisations.

Scope and Application

The Commonwealth Employees (Redeployment and Retirement) Regulations (Amendment) Statutory Rules 1982 No 302 applies to employees of the Commonwealth government and prescribed Commonwealth authorities. The Act aims to ensure that employees whose services cannot reasonably be utilised in their current roles are redeployed within the Australian Public Service or by a prescribed Commonwealth authority on duties they are capable of performing. The regulations, which are made under sub-section 29(2) of the Commonwealth Employees (Redeployment and Retirement) Act 1979, provide specific reasons for redeployment, including inefficiency and lack of qualifications, and detail the criteria for determining these conditions. The process for making these regulations involves the Governor-General considering a report from the Public Service Board after it consults with organisations representing employee interests, such as the Australian Council of Trade Unions. These regulations extend the application of the Act by defining and setting out the criteria for inefficiency and lack of qualifications, thereby providing clarity and ensuring a structured approach to employee redeployment.

Key Provisions

The Commonwealth Employees (Redeployment and Retirement) Regulations (Amendment) Statutory Rules 1982 primarily focus on the redeployment of employees who cannot reasonably be used in their current positions. Section 7(1)(b) of the Commonwealth Employees (Redeployment and Retirement) Act 1979 specifies the conditions under which an employee may be deemed eligible for redeployment, including instances where they are inefficient or not qualified to perform their duties. This aligns with the objects of the Act, which aim to ensure employees whose services cannot reasonably be utilised in their current roles are redeployed within the Australian Public Service or by a prescribed Commonwealth authority. Under these regulations, specific criteria are established to determine whether an employee is "inefficient" or "not qualified" to perform their duties. An employee is considered "inefficient" if they fail to attain or maintain a reasonable standard of efficiency in their normal duties, as measured against what can reasonably be expected from a person performing those duties. The regulations detail certain mandatory factors and permissible considerations to assess efficiency. Similarly, an employee is deemed "not qualified to perform his duties" if they have lost, become unable, or ineligible to hold an essential qualification necessary for those duties, or if such a qualification has been withdrawn by a competent person or body. Entities governed by these regulations bear specific obligations to ensure compliance with the outlined criteria. They must adhere to the defined standards of efficiency and qualifications, and take into account the stipulated factors when assessing an employee's suitability for their role. This includes considering both mandatory and optional factors when determining efficiency and qualification status. The regulations impose a requirement on the Governor-General to consider a report from the Public Service Board, which consults with relevant employee representative organisations, before making regulations regarding reasons for redeployment. Failure to comply with these provisions can lead to significant consequences. While the regulations themselves do not explicitly outline specific offences or penalties, breaches of the underlying Act may result in various civil or criminal liabilities. For instance, improper classification or redeployment of employees can lead to legal actions, including claims for wrongful termination or unfair dismissal. Additionally, if the regulations are found to contravene other legislative frameworks, such as anti-discrimination laws, further penalties may apply. The severity of penalties can vary, but they may include fines or other legal sanctions as determined by relevant courts or tribunals.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Employment & Labour Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Licensing & Registration
Offence Provisions

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.