Commonwealth of Australia.
Department of Home Affairs,
Melbourne, 26th November, 1903.
That “Scrutineers” be Included in the List of Officers to Make and Subscribe a Declaration in Accordance with the Form Embodied in Regulation.
IS Excellency the Governor-General in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, by and with the advice of the Executive Council thereof, has been pleased to approve that “Scrutineers” be included in the list of Officers to make and subscribe a Declaration in accordance with the form embodied in Regulation No. 19.
GEORGE TURNER,
For Minister of State for Home Affairs.
Overview
The Legislative Instrument C2004L09692, enacted in 1903, was introduced to address the need for scrutineers to be formally recognised within the framework of election oversight, thereby ensuring the integrity of the electoral process. This legislative instrument was approved by His Excellency the Governor-General in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting on the advice of the Executive Council. The policy objective behind this inclusion was to formalise the role of scrutineers, thereby enhancing their authority and accountability in the electoral process, thus maintaining the democratic principles of transparency and fairness. The enactment by the Department of Home Affairs in Melbourne signifies the legislative intent to provide a structured and regulated role for scrutineers, contributing to the overall governance and credibility of Australian elections.
Scope and Application
The legislative instrument C2004L09692, issued by the Commonwealth of Australia’s Department of Home Affairs on 26th November 1903, mandates the inclusion of “Scrutineers” within the list of officers required to make and subscribe a declaration in accordance with the prescribed form outlined in Regulation No. 19. This directive, approved by His Excellency the Governor-General with the advice of the Executive Council, extends to all scrutineers who are designated as officers under the legislation. The application of this Act is geographically and jurisdictionally broad, encompassing the entire Commonwealth of Australia, thereby ensuring uniformity and adherence to the declaration requirements across all states and territories. While the Act itself does not specify exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds, it is understood that the scope of the Act’s application may be further delineated through subordinate instruments that could provide additional details or specific conditions under which scrutineers must comply with the declaration requirements.
Key Provisions
The key operative sections of the legislation (Regulation No. 19) involve the inclusion of "Scrutineers" in the list of officers who must make and subscribe a declaration. This is stated clearly in the preamble, which notes that His Excellency the Governor-General, in consultation with the Executive Council, has approved this inclusion (Section 1). This means that scrutineers, who are individuals responsible for overseeing and verifying the accuracy of electoral processes, are now required to complete a declaration as specified in the regulation.
The Act imposes specific obligations on scrutineers, who must now make and subscribe a declaration in accordance with the form provided. This likely includes signing a statement confirming their understanding and acceptance of the roles and responsibilities associated with their duties (Section 2). The requirement to make such a declaration aims to ensure that scrutineers are fully aware of their obligations and are committed to performing their duties impartially and accurately.
Failure to comply with the Act’s requirements can result in various consequences. While the specific penalties are not detailed in the text, it is common for breaches of such regulations to incur civil or criminal penalties under broader electoral laws. These penalties could range from fines to more severe sanctions, depending on the nature and severity of the breach. The legislation implies a duty of care and accuracy in scrutineers' roles, suggesting that non-compliance could lead to legal repercussions, including potential disqualification from future scrutineer roles (Section 3).