Commission of Inquiry into Manipulation of the Oil-for-Food Programme by the Iraqi Regime - 10/11/2005 (Amendment)

Administered by Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet

Legislation au C2004Q00946 In force Prerogative Instrument

Legislation content

 

ENTERED ON RECORD by me in Register of Patents No.    41             , page    1      , on 6 February 2006

 

 

 

 

Secretary to the Federal Executive Council

ELIZABETH THE SECOND, by the Grace of God Queen of Australia and Her other Realms and Territories, Head of the Commonwealth:

TO the Honourable Terence Rhoderic Hudson Cole AO RFD QC

WHEREAS it is desired to amend the Letters Patent issued to you in relation to certain matters relating to decisions or actions of Australian companies mentioned in the Final Report (“Manipulation of the Oil-for-Food Programme by the Iraqi Regime”) of the Independent Inquiry Committee into the United Nations Oil-for-Food Programme:

BY these Letters Patent issued in Our name by Our Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia on the advice of the Federal Executive Council and pursuant to the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia, the Royal Commissions Act 1902 and other enabling powers, We amend the Letters Patent, dated 10 November 2005, appointing you to be a Commissioner to inquire into those certain matters:

(a) by adding after paragraph (a) of the fourth paragraph of the Letters Patent the paragraph:

‘(aa) whether any decision, action conduct, payment or writing of:

(i) BHP Limited (now BHP Billiton Limited), BHP Billiton Petroleum Pty Limited or BHP Petroleum Limited; or

(ii) Tigris Petroleum Corporation Pty Limited or Tigris Corporation Ltd: or

(iii) any person associated with one of the companies mentioned in subparagraph (i) or (ii);

in relation to:

(iv) the shipment of approximately 20,000 tonnes of Australian wheat to the Grain Board of Iraq in December 1995-January 1996 (the 1996 shipment); or

(v) the procurement of any United Nations approval and permission to export under the Customs (Prohibited Exports) Regulations 1958 in respect of the 1996 shipment; or

(vi) any agreements or arrangements made in relation to payment for the 1996 shipment; or

(vii) agreements by AWB Limited to sell 1 million tonnes of Australian wheat to the Grain Board of Iraq in December 2002, including any renegotiations of those agreements (the 2012 contracts); or

(viii) the procurement of any United Nations approval and permission to export under the Customs (Prohibited Exports) Regulations 1958 in respect of the 2002 contracts;

might have constituted a breach of any law of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory; and’; and

(b) by omitting from paragraph (b) of the fourth paragraph of the Letters Patent the words:

‘if so, whether the question of criminal or other legal proceedings’

and substituting the words:

‘if the answer to either of paragraph (a) or (aa) is in the affirmative whether the question of criminal or other legal proceedings’.

 

WITNESS His Excellency Major General Philip Michael Jeffery, Companion of the Order of Australia, Commander of the Royal Victorian Order, Military Cross, GovernorGeneral of the Commonwealth of Australia.

Dated 6 February 2006

GovernorGeneral

By His Excellency’s Command

AttorneyGeneral

for the Prime Minister

 

 

Overview

The C2004Q00946 Act, enacted in 2004, was introduced to address the gap in legal proceedings concerning the manipulation of the Oil-for-Food Programme by the Iraqi Regime. This piece of legislation was established by the Federal Executive Council, which was acting on advice from the relevant authorities. The primary objective of the Act was to ensure that any decisions or actions by Australian companies involved in the Oil-for-Food Programme, including BHP Limited, Tigris Petroleum Corporation Pty Limited, and AWB Limited, were thoroughly examined to determine if they constituted breaches of any law within the Commonwealth, a State, or a Territory. The Act aimed to facilitate the necessary legal proceedings if any breaches were identified, thereby upholding the integrity of Australian legal standards and international obligations.

Scope and Application

The amended Letters Patent, issued under the authority of the Commonwealth of Australia, modify the scope of the Royal Commission appointed by the Honourable Terence Rhoderic Hudson Cole AO RFD QC. This amendment focuses on investigating potential breaches of law related to the shipment of Australian wheat to Iraq, specifically examining the activities of BHP Limited (now BHP Billiton Limited), BHP Billiton Petroleum Pty Limited, BHP Petroleum Limited, Tigris Petroleum Corporation Pty Limited, Tigris Corporation Ltd, and any associated persons. The investigation encompasses the shipment of approximately 20,000 tonnes of Australian wheat to Iraq in 1996, the procurement of UN approval for this shipment, agreements made for the payment of the shipment, and the 2002 contracts for the sale of 1 million tonnes of Australian wheat to Iraq, including related UN approval processes. The Royal Commission's mandate extends to determining if these actions might have constituted a breach of any Commonwealth, State, or Territory law, thereby potentially leading to criminal or other legal proceedings. The amendment excludes certain previous scopes of inquiry, refining the focus to the specific transactions and entities mentioned.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of this legislation involve the amendment of the Letters Patent dated 10 November 2005, which appointed a Commissioner to inquire into specific matters. The new amendment, dated 6 February 2006, introduces additional inquiry parameters (section 1(a)) and modifies the scope of the Commissioner's investigation (section 1(b)). Specifically, section 1(a) mandates the Commissioner to investigate whether certain decisions, actions, or agreements by entities such as BHP Limited, Tigris Petroleum Corporation Pty Limited, and associated persons, in relation to the shipment of Australian wheat to Iraq in 1996 and 2002, might have breached any law of the Commonwealth, a State, or a Territory. Section 1(b) adjusts the scope of the Commissioner’s inquiry by altering the conditions under which criminal or other legal proceedings might be considered, based on the findings of the inquiry. The obligations and requirements imposed by this Act on the parties involved primarily revolve around the expanded scope of the Commissioner's inquiry. The Commissioner must now investigate not only the original specified matters but also the additional matters listed in section 1(a). This includes examining whether any actions related to the shipment of Australian wheat to Iraq in 1996 and 2002, including procurement of United Nations approval, payment arrangements, and agreements made by AWB Limited, might have constituted a breach of any law. Furthermore, the Commissioner must report on whether the question of criminal or other legal proceedings arises if the affirmative answers are found in either of the specified paragraphs. The legislation does not explicitly outline specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for breach within the text. However, the nature of the Commissioner's inquiry suggests that any breaches of law uncovered could potentially lead to recommendations for legal action, either civil or criminal, depending on the findings. The precise consequences would depend on subsequent actions taken by relevant authorities based on the Commissioner’s report, and could include fines, imprisonment, or other legal sanctions under the relevant laws of the Commonwealth, a State, or a Territory.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Administrative Law
Instrument
Prerogative instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Enforcement Powers
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.