Commerce (Export Dairy Produce) Regulations (Amendment)

Overview

Statutory Rules 1935 No. 132, made under the Commerce (Trade Descriptions) Act 1905–1933 and the Customs Act 1901–1935, was enacted by the Governor-General, Sir Isaac Isaacs, on 11 December 1935, with the advice of the Federal Executive Council. The purpose of these regulations was to amend the Commerce (Export Dairy Produce) Regulations, specifically by repealing Regulation 65. This amendment came into effect on 16 December 1935, as notified in the Commonwealth Gazette on 12 December 1935. The overarching objective of these regulations was to refine and adapt the export standards and inspection processes for dairy produce in line with contemporary trade practices and to address any identified gaps or issues in the existing regulatory framework. The regulations were issued by the Commonwealth Government, with L. F. Johnston, the Commonwealth Government Printer in Canberra, authorised to print and distribute these statutory rules. The amendments reflect a commitment to maintaining high standards in the export of dairy products, ensuring that they meet both domestic and international trade descriptions and quality requirements. This legislative action was essential to support the commerce and trade sectors, particularly in the export of dairy produce, by ensuring compliance with the stipulated trade descriptions and customs regulations.

Scope and Application

The Statutory Rules of 1935, No. 132, establish regulations under the Commerce (Trade Descriptions) Act 1905–1933 and the Customs Act 1901–1935. These regulations apply to entities and individuals involved in the export of dairy produce, ensuring compliance with specific trade descriptions and customs requirements. The geographic scope of these regulations is national, covering the entire Commonwealth of Australia. The regulations include amendments to the Commerce (Export Dairy Produce) Regulations, specifically repealing Regulation 65, which took effect on the sixteenth day of December, 1935. Although the primary focus is on the dairy industry, the broader implications of these regulations could influence other industries engaged in export activities. The application of these regulations is overseen by the Governor-General, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, thereby ensuring a unified approach to trade compliance across the nation.

Key Provisions

The Statutory Rules 1935, No. 132, made under the Commerce (Trade Descriptions) Act 1905–1933 and the Customs Act 1901–1935, primarily amend the Commerce (Export Dairy Produce) Regulations. The main operative section, Regulation 65, has been repealed (Section 1). This repeal signifies an alteration in the regulatory framework governing the export of dairy products, likely reflecting changes in trade practices, industry standards, or compliance requirements. The regulation that was in place prior to this amendment will cease to have effect on the 16th of December, 1935 (Section 2), providing a clear timeline for stakeholders to adjust to the new regulatory environment. These regulations impose specific obligations on entities involved in the export of dairy produce. Although the repealed Regulation 65 is not detailed in the provided text, its repeal suggests that entities must now comply with revised or new standards that may address aspects such as product quality, packaging, labelling, or other trade descriptions pertinent to dairy exports. The changes aim to ensure that exported goods meet the necessary standards and comply with updated legislative requirements. Failure to comply with these regulations can result in various consequences. While the specific penalties are not detailed in the provided text, under the Acts from which these regulations derive, non-compliance typically leads to enforcement actions that can include fines, product seizures, and legal proceedings. The penalties can vary significantly depending on the severity and frequency of the breach. For instance, under the Customs Act 1901–1935, serious or repeated breaches may incur substantial fines, potentially reaching tens of thousands of dollars, as well as criminal charges that could result in imprisonment. It is imperative for entities to adhere to the updated regulations to avoid these adverse outcomes.