Explanatory Statement
Civil Aviation Act 1988
Civil Aviation Order 95.32 Amendment Order (No. 1) 2006
Section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) empowers the Governor-General to make regulations for the purposes of the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation.
Regulation 5 of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988) empowers CASA to issue any direction or notification or give permission, approval or authority in Civil Aviation Orders (CAOs).
Under subregulation 308 (1) of CAR 1988, CASA may exempt aircraft, or persons in, on, or otherwise associated with the operation of the aircraft, from compliance with specified provisions of CAR 1988.
Under subregulation 308 (3), the exemptions may be granted subject to conditions. A condition that is imposed on the majority of sports aviation aircraft is that they are not allowed to be flown inside controlled airspace. ICAO definition of controlled airspace includes Class E airspace. However, Class E airspace is different from other classes of controlled airspace in that control is only exercised over aircraft that are operating to the Instrument Flight Rules, so that no A.T.C. clearance is required for an aircraft to operate under the Visual Flight Rules in visual meteorological conditions. The amendment is to allow sport and recreational aircraft operations under V.F.R. to be flown in Class E airspace in V.M.C.
Legislative Instruments Act
Under subparagraph 6 (d) (i) of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (the LIA), an instrument is a legislative instrument for section 5 of the LIA if it is declared to be a disallowable instrument under legislation in force before the commencement of the LIA. Under subsection 95 (5) of the Act, CAOs are declared to be disallowable instruments. The amendment Order is, therefore, a legislative instrument and it is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the LIA.
Consultation
Consultations under section 17 of the LIA have not been undertaken as the amendment is minor and of a machinery nature.
For the same reason, the Office of Regulation Review does not require a Regulation Impact Statement as the amendment is minor and of a machinery nature.
The instrument commences on the day after it is registered.
The instrument has been been made by the Director of Aviation Safety, on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 84A (2) of the Act.
[Civil Aviation Order 95.32 Amendment Order (No. 1) 2006]
Overview
The Civil Aviation Order 95.32 Amendment Order (No. 1) 2006 was introduced to address a specific operational limitation for sport and recreational aircraft within the existing framework of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 and Civil Aviation Regulations 1988. The Act empowers the Governor-General to make regulations for the safety of air navigation, while the Civil Aviation Order, issued under the authority of the Civil Aviation Regulations, provides the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) with the ability to issue directions, notifications, permissions, approvals, and authorities. Notably, subregulation 308(1) of the Civil Aviation Regulations enables CASA to exempt aircraft from certain regulatory provisions, subject to conditions, such as the restriction on flying sports aviation aircraft within controlled airspace. This amendment specifically targets the allowance for sport and recreational aircraft to operate under Visual Flight Rules within Class E airspace in Visual Meteorological Conditions, a change designed to enhance operational flexibility and safety for these aircraft.
The amendment was enacted under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, with the Civil Aviation Order being classified as a disallowable instrument, thus subject to parliamentary scrutiny and potential disallowance. Despite the significance of this amendment, consultation processes under the Legislative Instruments Act were deemed unnecessary due to the minor and procedural nature of the changes. This legislative instrument was made by the Director of Aviation Safety on behalf of CASA, in accordance with the Civil Aviation Act 1988, and it came into effect following registration.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Order 95.32 Amendment Order (No. 1) 2006 amends the Civil Aviation Order 95.32, which pertains to the exemption of aircraft and related personnel from specific provisions of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988. This amendment applies to sport and recreational aircraft and those operating under Visual Flight Rules in visual meteorological conditions, allowing them to fly in Class E airspace. This Act applies to aircraft, persons, and entities involved in the operation of sport and recreational aircraft within the jurisdiction of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA). Geographically, its application extends to all areas under Australian jurisdiction where Civil Aviation Regulations are in effect. The amendment does not impose new exclusions or thresholds but refines existing conditions under which exemptions can be granted. The application and enforcement of this Order are subject to the broader legislative framework provided by the Civil Aviation Act 1988 and the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988, with further details and stipulations being outlined in subordinate instruments such as the Civil Aviation Orders. The legislative instrument is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament, as stipulated by the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Order 95.32 Amendment Order (No. 1) 2006 amends the Civil Aviation Order 95.32, which governs the operation of aircraft in controlled airspace. Section 1 of the amendment allows sport and recreational aircraft to operate under Visual Flight Rules (VFR) within Class E airspace in Visual Meteorological Conditions (VMC), a change from the previous prohibition on such operations in this airspace (section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 and subregulation 308 of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988). This amendment, effective from the day after registration, aims to facilitate the operation of certain aircraft within a specified airspace under defined conditions. It is important to note that these operations are still subject to any conditions imposed by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) in accordance with subregulation 308(3) of CAR 1988.
The obligations under this Order for the parties involved, primarily CASA and the operators of sport and recreational aircraft, include ensuring that any operations conducted under these amended conditions adhere strictly to the VFR and VMC stipulations. CASA retains the authority to issue directions, notifications, permissions, approvals, or authorities related to these operations, as per regulation 5 of CAR 1988. Aircraft operators must ensure that their pilots and crew are adequately trained and informed of these regulations to maintain compliance and safety standards.
Failure to comply with the provisions of the Civil Aviation Order, including any conditions imposed by CASA, could result in legal consequences. Such breaches may be subject to enforcement actions under the Civil Aviation Act 1988, potentially leading to penalties or other sanctions. While specific penalties are not detailed in the explanatory statement, they could include fines or other corrective measures as prescribed by the Act. The legislative framework ensures that any infringements are taken seriously to uphold the safety and integrity of the aviation system.
The amendment process and legislative requirements are detailed within the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, which mandates that the amendment be declared a disallowable instrument and subject to parliamentary scrutiny. The amendment, being minor and of a machinery nature, did not require extensive consultation or a Regulation Impact Statement. The instrument was made by the Director of Aviation Safety on behalf of CASA, in compliance with the relevant sections of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, ensuring that the amendment is properly authorised and documented.