Civil Aviation Order 82.5 Amendment Instrument 2012 (No. 1)

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2012L00660 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Explanatory Statement

 

Civil Aviation Act 1988

 

Civil Aviation Order 82.5 Amendment Instrument 2012 (No. 1)

 

Purpose

The purpose of Civil Aviation Order 82.5 Amendment Instrument 2012 (No. 1) (the CAO amendment) is to correct an error that appeared in Civil Aviation Order 82.5 Amendment Instrument 2011 (No. 3) (the previous CAO amendment).

 

Legislative background

Under section 27 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act), CASA may issue Air Operators’ Certificates (AOCs), with respect to aircraft, for the purpose of safety regulation.

 

Under section 28 of the Act, CASA must issue the AOC if satisfied that the applicant can comply with the requirements of Australian civil aviation safety legislation.

 

Under paragraph 28BA (1) (b) of the Act, an AOC has effect subject to any conditions specified in the regulations or the Civil Aviation Orders (the CAOs).

 

Part 82 of the CAOs specifies conditions on AOCs. Civil Aviation Order 82.5 (CAO 82.5) contains conditions on those AOCs that authorise regular public transport (RPT) operations in high capacity aircraft.

 

Subsection 10 of CAO 82.5 sets out obligations on operators who hold foreign aircraft AOCs for RPT operations in Australia. In particular, paragraph 10.8 provides that the operator of a foreign registered aircraft must ensure that it complies with the requirements (Directions) in Appendix 4 (and, in effect, Appendix 5) concerning automatic dependent surveillance broadcast (ADS-B).

 

Appendix 5 contains standards for the GNSS position source equipment used to enable the ADS-B equipment to transmit geographical position. These standards differ depending on the date when the aircraft was manufactured. Appendix 5 also contains alternative approved equipment configuration standards — again depending on whether the aircraft was manufactured before or after a certain date.

 

Background

The previous CAO amendment was made to ensure that certain amended requirements, in relation to the use of ADS-B, applied to operators of foreign aircraft in Australian territory engaged in RPT operations in high capacity aircraft (the relevant foreign aircraft).

 

Under Civil Aviation Order 20.18 Amendment Instrument 2011 (No. 2) (the CAO 20.18 amendment), the amended requirements mentioned above applied to Australian aircraft. The previous CAO amendment, which commenced at the same time as the CAO 20.18 amendment, operated by imposing on relevant foreign aircraft the same requirements for ADS-B as are imposed on Australian aircraft by the CAO 20.18 amendment.

 

The CAO 20.18 amendment, among other things, modified the rules pertaining to aircraft ADS-B equipment to extend the compliance date by which newlymanufactured aircraft must meet a certain technical standard (the GNSS Selective Availability Aware (SA Aware) feature) if they are fitted with ADSB equipment.

 

To bring this about, the previous CAO amendment was intended to omit from Appendix 5 mention of 28 June 2012 as the manufactured-before cut-off date and insert 8 December 2016 in order to extend the compliance date by which newlymanufactured aircraft must meet the standard for incorporation of the SA Aware feature in GNSS position source equipment used for ADS-B.

 

However, in 2 instances, the erroneous date of 12 December 2013 was inserted into Appendix 5 instead of 8 December 2016, namely in clause 3 and its heading relating to GNSS position source equipment.

 

The CAO amendment corrects this date error.

 

Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (the LIA)

Paragraph 28BA (1) (b) of the Act provides that an AOC has effect subject to any conditions “specified in the regulations or Civil Aviation Orders”.

 

Subsection 98 (4A) of the Act provides that CASA may issue CAOs with respect to any matter “in relation to which regulations may be made for the purposes of section 28BA”.

 

Under subsection 98 (4B) of the Act, a CAO issued under subsection 98 (4A) is stated to be a legislative instrument and is, therefore, subject to registration, and tabling and disallowance in the Parliament, under sections 24, and 38 and 42, of the LIA.

 

However, by providing that an AOC has effect subject to any conditions specified in the regulations or CAOs, paragraph 28BA (1) (b) of the Act is a separate head of power for the making of relevant CAOs. For section 5 of the LIA, such CAOs would be legislative instruments subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the LIA.

 

The CAO amendment is made under paragraph 28BA (1) (b) of the Act and subsection 98 (4A) of the Act and is a legislative instrument.

 

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

The following Statement is prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

 

The CAO amendment is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

 

The CAO amendment is an amendment to correct a date error in the previous CAO amendment. The CAO amendment does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms and is compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues.

 

Consultation

The purpose of the CAO amendment is to correct a date error in the previous CAO amendment. The correction required no specific consultation. The substantive changes made by the previous CAO amendment were the subject of industry consultation in accordance with the normal processes used by CASA for regulatory developments, including Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) No. 1103AS.

 

Regulation Impact Statement (RIS)

The CAO amendment is merely technical and will not increase costs for, or impose any additional requirements on, aircraft operators. Therefore, a RIS is not required for the Office of Best Practice Regulation. The previous CAO amendment had already been the subject of a preliminary assessment of the business compliance costs indicating that it would have only a nil to low impact on business (OBPR Id. No. 13116).

 

Commencement and making

The CAO amendment takes effect on the day after registration. It has been made by the Director of Aviation Safety, on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 73 (2) of the Act.

 

[Civil Aviation Order 82.5 Amendment Instrument 2012 (No. 1)]

Overview

The Civil Aviation Order 82.5 Amendment Instrument 2012 (No. 1) was enacted to rectify an error that had appeared in the Civil Aviation Order 82.5 Amendment Instrument 2011 (No. 3). This error involved incorrect dates being inserted into Appendix 5 concerning automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast (ADS-B) requirements for foreign aircraft operators engaged in regular public transport (RPT) operations in Australia. The Civil Aviation Act 1988, enacted by the Australian Parliament, provides the legislative framework for the regulation of civil aviation safety, including the issuance of Air Operators' Certificates (AOCs) by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA). The policy objective of the CAO amendment is to ensure compliance with international standards for ADS-B equipment in aircraft operating in Australian territory, thereby maintaining safety and consistency with the requirements applied to Australian-registered aircraft. The amendment was made under the authority granted by the Civil Aviation Act and is subject to the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Order 82.5 Amendment Instrument 2012 (No. 1) amends Civil Aviation Order 82.5 to correct an error in the previous CAO amendment. The amendment applies to operators of foreign aircraft engaged in regular public transport operations in high capacity aircraft within Australia. This includes both individuals and entities that are holders of Air Operators’ Certificates (AOCs) as specified under the Civil Aviation Act 1988. The correction rectifies an erroneous date inserted in the previous CAO amendment, ensuring consistency with the standards set out for aircraft Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) equipment. The amendment has a national jurisdictional reach, as it pertains to operations within Australian territory. There are no stated exclusions or thresholds specified in the amendment, and it does not extend or restrict the application through subordinate instruments. The amendment is made under the authority of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 and is subject to the legislative processes outlined in the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of the Civil Aviation Order 82.5 Amendment Instrument 2012 (No. 1) (the CAO amendment) pertain to the correction of an error found in the previous CAO amendment, specifically the incorrect dates inserted into Appendix 5 of the Civil Aviation Order 82.5 (CAO 82.5). Section 1 of the CAO amendment corrects the erroneous dates of 12 December 2013, which were mistakenly inserted in clauses 3 and its heading relating to GNSS position source equipment, by replacing them with the correct date of 8 December 2016. This amendment ensures that the requirements for the GNSS Selective Availability Aware (SA Aware) feature in GNSS position source equipment for ADS-B are consistent and correctly aligned with those set out in the Civil Aviation Order 20.18 Amendment Instrument 2011 (No. 2). The obligations imposed by the CAO amendment on the parties it governs, particularly the operators of foreign aircraft engaged in regular public transport (RPT) operations in high capacity aircraft, are to ensure compliance with the corrected requirements set out in Appendix 5 of CAO 82.5. Specifically, operators must ensure their GNSS position source equipment meets the specified standards for ADS-B based on the correct manufacturing date cut-offs. These standards are critical for maintaining the safety and interoperability of air traffic management systems in Australian airspace. The CAO amendment does not introduce any new offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for breach, as it is a technical correction of previously issued CAOs. However, failure to comply with the corrected requirements could result in regulatory action by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA). Potential consequences may include enforcement actions under the Civil Aviation Act 1988, such as the suspension or revocation of Air Operators’ Certificates (AOCs) for non-compliance with the safety standards specified in the CAOs. The maximum penalties for breaches of civil aviation safety legislation can be significant, including fines and imprisonment, depending on the severity and nature of the non-compliance.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Aviation Law
Instrument
Statutory Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Compliance Obligations
Offence Provisions

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.