Civil Aviation Order 20.18 Amendment Instrument 2013 (No. 1)

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2013L00070 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Explanatory Statement

Civil Aviation Act 1988

Civil Aviation Order 20.18 Amendment Instrument 2013 (No. 1)

 

Legislation

Section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) empowers the Governor-General to make regulations for the Act and the safety of air navigation.

 

Under subregulation 207 (2) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988), a person must not use an Australian aircraft in a class of operation if the aircraft is not fitted with the instruments and equipment approved and directed by CASA. In approving or directing, CASA may have regard only to the safety of air navigation.

 

Under subregulation 5 (1) of CAR 1988, where CASA is empowered to issue certain instruments such as approvals or directions, it may do so in a Civil Aviation Order (CAO).

 

For subregulation 207 (2) of CAR 1988, CASA made CAO 20.18 setting out the approval and directions for aircraft instruments and equipment to meet basic operational requirements.

 

Background

Paragraph 10.1 of Civil Aviation Order 20.18 required that “In the case of a charter or regular public transport aircraft, all instruments and equipment fitted to the aircraft must be serviceable before take-off”. The use of these words has caused uncertainty. It was decided to ensure that they were regarded as referring to instruments required under subregulation 207 (2).

 

Details of the CAO amendment

The CAO amendment clarifies the meaning by specifically mentioning that the paragraph only applies to instruments or equipment that an aircraft carries or is fitted with under subregulation 207 (2). To avoid doubt the amendment also adds a note after paragraph 10.1 describing the instruments and equipment to which it applies.

 

Legislative Instruments Act

Under subregulation 5 (1) of CAR 1988, if CAR 1988 empowers CASA to issue instruments such as approvals or directions, CASA may do so in the form of CAOs. Under subsection 98 (5) of the Act, where regulations provide for an instrument to be issued in the form of a CAO, the CAO so made is declared to be a disallowable instrument. Under subparagraph 6 (d) (i) of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (the LIA), an instrument is a legislative instrument for section 5 of the LIA if it is declared to be a disallowable instrument under legislation in force before the commencement of the LIA. The CAO amendment is, therefore, a legislative instrument. It is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the LIA.

 

Consultation

As this CAO amendment only formalises what is an accepted interpretation as published by CASA (see CASA ruling 1/2004), in addition to omitting an invalid cross-reference, the amendment is considered to be minor and machinery in nature and CASA has not conducted further consultation.

 

Compatibility with human rights and freedoms

A statement of compatibility with Human Rights is at Attachment 1.

 

Regulation Impact Statement

The Office of Best Practice Regulation (OBPR) does not require preparation of a Regulation Impact Statement in this case. The OBPR assessed that the proposed CAO amendment is machinery in nature and no further analysis in the form of a Regulation Impact Statement was required (OBPR ID: 14415).

 

Commencement and making

The CAO amendment takes effect on the day after registration. It has been made by the Director of Aviation Safety, on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 73 (2) of the Act.

 

[Civil Aviation Order 20.18 Amendment Instrument 2013 (No. 1)]

 

Attachment 1

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011

 

CIVIL AVIATION ORDER 20.18 AMENDMENT INSTRUMENT 2013 (NO. 1)

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

 

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

Under subregulation 207 (2) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988, a person must not use an Australian aircraft in a class of operation if the aircraft is not fitted with the instruments and equipment approved and directed by CASA. In approving or directing, CASA may have regard only to the safety of air navigation.

 

CASA made Civil Aviation Order 20.18 (CAO 20.18) setting out the approval and directions for aircraft instruments and equipment to meet basic operational requirements.

 

Paragraph 10.1 of CAO 20.18 required that “In the case of a charter or regular public transport aircraft, all instruments and equipment fitted to the aircraft must be serviceable before take-off”. The use of these words has caused uncertainty.

 

The purpose of this instrument is to amend CAO 20.18 to clarify the meaning of paragraph 10.1 by specifically mentioning that paragraph 10.1 only applies to instruments or equipment that an aircraft carries or is fitted with under subregulation 207 (2). To avoid doubt the amendment also adds a note after paragraph 10.1 describing the instruments and equipment to which it applies.

 

In addition, the instrument omits an invalid cross-reference in Appendix V, which relates to emergency lighting equipment.

 

Human rights implications

This Legislative Instrument does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms. It’s only purpose is to remove doubt as to the meaning of provisions in CAO 20.18.

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues.

Civil Aviation Safety Authority

 

Overview

The Civil Aviation Order 20.18 Amendment Instrument 2013 (No. 1) amends the Civil Aviation Order 20.18, which sets out the requirements for the approval and direction of aircraft instruments and equipment to meet basic operational requirements under the Civil Aviation Act 1988. This amendment was enacted to address uncertainties and clarify the meaning of certain provisions in the Civil Aviation Order, particularly relating to the serviceability of instruments and equipment on charter or regular public transport aircraft before take-off. The Civil Aviation Order was made by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) under the authority granted by the Civil Aviation Act 1988, with the policy objective of ensuring that only instruments and equipment approved by CASA are used in the operation of Australian aircraft, thereby enhancing the safety of air navigation. This amendment to the Civil Aviation Order was introduced to ensure that paragraph 10.1 applies specifically to instruments and equipment that an aircraft carries or is fitted with under subregulation 207(2) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988, thereby removing any ambiguity about its scope. Additionally, the amendment adds a note clarifying the application of this paragraph and removes an invalid cross-reference. The instrument is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, and has been assessed as being compatible with human rights as it does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Order 20.18 Amendment Instrument 2013 (No. 1) pertains to the Civil Aviation Act 1988 and applies to all persons and entities involved in the operation of Australian aircraft, including airlines and charter operators. It mandates that aircraft used in specific classes of operations must be equipped with instruments and equipment that are approved and directed by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA). This requirement is explicitly for the purpose of ensuring the safety of air navigation, and CASA’s approval or direction must solely consider this aspect. The amendment to Civil Aviation Order 20.18 aims to clarify existing regulations, specifically addressing paragraph 10.1 which previously required that all instruments and equipment on charter or regular public transport aircraft be serviceable before take-off, a phrase that has led to some uncertainty. The amendment specifies that this requirement applies only to instruments and equipment approved and directed by CASA under subregulation 207(2) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988, thereby removing ambiguity. Additionally, the amendment removes an invalid cross-reference related to emergency lighting equipment. The amendment applies nationally, aligning with the jurisdictional reach of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 and is subject to the legislative oversight mechanisms under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, including tabling and disallowance in Parliament.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Act 1988 (section 98) authorises the Governor-General to enact regulations for the Act, including the safety of air navigation. Under subregulation 207(2) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988), any person is prohibited from using an Australian aircraft in a class of operation if it is not equipped with instruments and equipment approved and directed by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA). CASA may only consider the safety of air navigation when approving or directing such equipment. Furthermore, subregulation 5(1) of CAR 1988 permits CASA to issue instruments such as approvals or directions through a Civil Aviation Order (CAO). The Civil Aviation Order 20.18 Amendment Instrument 2013 (No. 1) modifies Civil Aviation Order 20.18 (CAO 20.18) to clarify the scope of paragraph 10.1. This paragraph, which previously stated that "In the case of a charter or regular public transport aircraft, all instruments and equipment fitted to the aircraft must be serviceable before take-off", has been interpreted ambiguously. The amendment now explicitly states that paragraph 10.1 only applies to instruments or equipment that an aircraft carries or is fitted with under subregulation 207(2). Additionally, a note has been added after paragraph 10.1 to describe the instruments and equipment to which it applies. The amendment also removes an invalid cross-reference in Appendix V, which pertains to emergency lighting equipment. Under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, the CAO amendment is classified as a legislative instrument, subject to tabling and disallowance in Parliament. The amendment is deemed minor and procedural, as it formalises an accepted interpretation already published by CASA. Consequently, CASA did not undertake additional consultation for this amendment. The Office of Best Practice Regulation has determined that a Regulation Impact Statement is not required, as the amendment is considered machinery in nature. The CAO amendment becomes effective the day after its registration and has been made by the Director of Aviation Safety on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 73(2) of the Civil Aviation Act 1988. The CAO amendment does not contravene any human rights or freedoms as recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011. The purpose of the amendment is solely to eliminate ambiguity regarding the meaning of provisions in CAO 20.18, without engaging any applicable rights or freedoms. The amendment is compatible with human rights, as it does not raise any human rights issues.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Administrative Law
Aviation Law
Instrument
Order
Concepts
Commencement Provisions
Regulatory Standards
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.