Explanatory Statement
Civil Aviation Act 1988
Civil Aviation Order 103.11 Repeal Order 2007
Subsection 98 (1) of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) provides that the Governor-General may make regulations for the Act and the safety of air navigation.
Under regulation 21A of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988, CASA may issue a design standard for an aircraft component for which no design standard is in force.
Civil Aviation Order 103.11 (CAO 103.11) contained design standards for cargo restraint equipment used in aircraft, including structural containers, pallets, nets and ropes. These standards are now outdated and CASA approves such components under regulation 21.305 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998).
This Order revokes CAO 103.11.
Legislative Instruments Act
Under subsection 98 (5) of the Act, where the regulations provide for certain instruments to be issued in the form of Civil Aviation Orders (the CAOs), such CAOs are declared to be disallowable instruments. Under subparagraph 6 (d) (i) of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (the LIA), an instrument is a legislative instrument for section 5 of the LIA if it is declared to be a disallowable instrument under legislation in force before the commencement of the LIA. The Order is, therefore, a legislative instrument and it is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the LIA.
Consultation under section 17 of the LIA has not been undertaken in this case because this Order merely revokes an Order that is outdated.
Office of Best Practice Regulation (OBPR)
OBPR does not require a Regulation Impact Statement for the revocation because a preliminary assessment of business compliance costs indicates that the revocation will have only a low impact on business.
Under the saving provision, cargo restraint equipment that complies with a standard set out in CAO 103.11 immediately before the commencement of this Order is taken to be approved by CASA under regulation 21.305 of CASR 1998, if installed on the aircraft immediately before the commencement of this Order.
The instrument commences on the day after it is registered.
The Order has been made by the Acting Director of Aviation Safety, on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 84A (2) of the Act.
[Civil Aviation Order 103.11 Repeal Order 2007]
Overview
The Civil Aviation Order 103.11 Repeal Order 2007 was enacted to address the issue of outdated design standards for cargo restraint equipment in aircraft, as outlined in Civil Aviation Order 103.11 (CAO 103.11). The Civil Aviation Act 1988 provides the framework for safety regulations in aviation, and the Civil Aviation Order 103.11, which set standards for items such as structural containers, pallets, nets, and ropes, was found to be outdated. This repeal order was introduced to streamline and modernise the regulatory framework by revoking the outdated CAO 103.11 and aligning it with the current practices under regulation 21.305 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998. The order was enacted by the Acting Director of Aviation Safety on behalf of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) and is subject to the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, which governs the tabling and disallowance of legislative instruments in Parliament. The Office of Best Practice Regulation determined that a Regulation Impact Statement was not necessary due to the minimal impact on business compliance costs resulting from the revocation.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Order 103.11 Repeal Order 2007 revokes Civil Aviation Order 103.11 (CAO 103.11), which contained outdated design standards for cargo restraint equipment used in aircraft. This legislation applies to aircraft operators, manufacturers, and suppliers of cargo restraint equipment such as structural containers, pallets, nets, and ropes, and the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), which is responsible for the safety oversight of these components. The repeal aligns with the updated safety standards and regulatory processes under the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998. The revocation of CAO 103.11 is jurisdictional in scope, applying across the Commonwealth of Australia. The Order does not apply to equipment that was already approved under CAO 103.11 prior to its revocation, provided it remains installed on the aircraft at the time of the repeal. The Order is subject to the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, making it a disallowable instrument, though consultation under section 17 of the LIA was not necessary in this case as the Order merely revokes outdated standards. The instrument commences on the day following its registration.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Order 103.11 Repeal Order 2007, under subsection 98(1) of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, enables the Governor-General to make regulations concerning the Act and the safety of air navigation. Specifically, this Order revokes Civil Aviation Order 103.11 (CAO 103.11), which previously contained design standards for cargo restraint equipment, such as structural containers, pallets, nets, and ropes used in aircraft. Now, the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) approves these components under regulation 21.305 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998. This transition reflects the need for updated standards to ensure the safety of air navigation.
The Order imposes specific obligations on CASA and other parties governed by the Civil Aviation Act. CASA must now approve cargo restraint equipment under regulation 21.305 of CASR 1998, rather than referring to the outdated standards in CAO 103.11. Manufacturers, operators, and other entities involved in the design and use of cargo restraint equipment must ensure compliance with CASA's updated approval processes. This change ensures that all cargo restraint equipment meets current safety standards, thereby enhancing the overall safety of air navigation.
Failure to comply with the provisions of this Order could result in various civil or criminal consequences. Under regulation 21.305 of CASR 1998, non-compliance with CASA's approval requirements could lead to enforcement actions, including fines and other penalties. The maximum penalties for breaches of the Civil Aviation Act and associated regulations can vary, but they may include substantial fines for individuals and corporations. Such consequences underscore the importance of adhering to CASA's updated approval processes for cargo restraint equipment.
This Order is subject to the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, which classifies it as a disallowable instrument due to its revocation of a previous order. Under the LIA, the Order must be tabled and can be subject to disallowance by Parliament, ensuring parliamentary oversight of regulatory changes. Additionally, the Office of Best Practice Regulation has determined that this Order does not require a Regulation Impact Statement, as it is expected to have only a low impact on business compliance costs. This decision reflects the relatively minor nature of the changes brought about by the revocation of CAO 103.11.