Civil Aviation Amendment Regulations 2005 (No. 1)

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2005L01485 Regulations Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

Select Legislative Instrument 2005 No. 137

 

Issued under the authority of the Minister for Transport and Regional Services

 

Civil Aviation Act 1988

 

Civil Aviation Amendment Regulations 2005 (No. 1)

Subsection 98 (1) of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) provides, in part, that the GovernorGeneral may make regulations, not inconsistent with the Act, prescribing matters required or permitted by the Act to be prescribed, or necessary or convenient to be prescribed for carrying out or giving effect to the Act, and regulations in relation to safety of air navigation, being regulations with respect to matters with respect to which the Parliament has power to make laws.

Subsection 9 (1) of the Act specifies, in part, that the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) has the function of conducting the safety regulation of civil air operations in Australian territory by means that include developing and promulgating appropriate, clear and concise aviation safety standards and issuing certificates, licences, registrations and permits.

The Civil Aviation Amendment Regulations 2003 (No.5), Statutory Rules 2003, No. 201 harmonised the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR) with the Criminal Code to ensure that the existing offence provisions in the CAR continued to operate in the same manner as they did before the application of the Criminal Code to all Commonwealth legislation on 15 December 2001. Under regulation 262AP, operations in experimental aircraft at night, under the instrument flight rules (I.F.R.), or over built-up areas, were unlawful unless expressly approved by CASA or an authorised person.  The harmonisation amendments to the regulation were designed to make it clear that the non-existence of an approval was not an element of the offence, but rather the existence of an approval was a defence to the offence.  That is, the amendments made it clear that the defendant bore the evidentiary burden of establishing the existence of an approval to conduct what were otherwise unlawful operations

Unfortunately, the harmonising amendment made inadvertent changes to regulation 262AP, Experimental aircraft – operating limitations that removed reference to CASA or an authorised person authorising certain operations in experimental aircraft. Concern with the change to regulation 262AP was brought to CASA’s attention by affected aviation community stakeholders.  For the purposes of consultation, the Regulations have been developed in conjunction with the aviation industry Standards Consultative Committee (SCC) and the associated Operations Standards and Sport and Recreation Standards Sub-committees.

The Regulations clarify the operation of regulation 262AP, to make it clear once again that operations by experimental aircraft at night, under the I.F.R., and over built-up areas, are permitted if expressly approved by CASA or an authorised person.  Nevertheless, it remains the case that the evidentiary burden of establishing the existence of an approval would remain with the defendant in any criminal prosecution for breach of the regulation.

The Office of Regulation Review (ORR) has assessed that the Regulations have only a minor impact on business, are considered minor and machinery in nature and do not substantially alter existing arrangements and that the preparation of a Regulation Impact Statement (RIS) is not mandatory.

The Regulations are a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.

The Regulations commence on the day after they are registered on the Federal Register of Legislative Instruments.

Details of the Regulations are attached.


ATTACHMENT

 

 

Details of the Civil Aviation Amendment Regulations 2005 (No. 1)

 

 

Regulation 1 - Name of Regulations

Regulation 1 names the Regulations as the Civil Aviation Amendment Regulations 2005
(No. 1).

 

Regulation 2 - Commencement

Regulation 2 provides that the Regulations commence on the day after they are registered on the Federal Register of Legislative Instruments.

 

Regulation 3 - Amendment of Civil Aviation Regulations 1988

Regulation 3 provides that Schedule 1 amends the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988.

 

SCHEDULE 1 – Amendments

   (regulation 3)

 

Item 1 – Subregulation 262AP (4)

Item 1 amends subregulation 262AP (4) by re-inserting a previous provision that permitted operations over a city or built-up area subject to authorisation by CASA or an authorised person (an industry representative).  The authorisation provision was inadvertently removed by a previous amendment at the time of harmonising with the Criminal Code.

 

Item 2 – Subregulation 262AP (6), including the penalty

Item 2 amends subregulation 262AP (6) by re-inserting a previous provision that provided operational flexibility subject to authorisation to do so, granted by CASA or an authorised person (an industry representative).  The authorisation provision was inadvertently removed by a previous amendment at the time of harmonising with the Criminal Code.

 

Item 3 – Subregulation 262AP (14)

Item 3 deletes subregulation 262AP (14), a defence provision for subregulation 262AP (4), as this provision is no longer relevant following the amendment to subregulation 262AP (4) at Item [1]. The provision was inserted at the time of harmonising with the Criminal Code to cater for the amendment to subregulation 262AP (4) which had inadvertently removed alternative authorisation powers.

 

Item 4 – Subregulation 262AP (15), including the note

Item 4 deletes subregulation 262AP (15), a defence provision for subregulation 262AP (6), as this provision is no longer relevant following the amendment to subregulation 262AP (6) at Item [2]. The provision was inserted at the time of harmonising with the Criminal Code to cater for the amendment to subregulation 262AP (6) which had inadvertently removed alternative authorisation powers.

 

Overview

The Civil Aviation Amendment Regulations 2005 (No. 1) were enacted to address an oversight in the previous amendments to the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988. These regulations were introduced to correct inadvertent changes made during the harmonisation process with the Criminal Code. Specifically, the 2003 amendments had removed references to authorisations by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) or authorised persons for certain operations of experimental aircraft at night, under instrument flight rules, or over built-up areas. This oversight was brought to the attention of CASA by stakeholders within the aviation community. To rectify this, the Civil Aviation Amendment Regulations 2005 (No. 1) were developed in consultation with the aviation industry Standards Consultative Committee and its sub-committees. The primary objective of these regulations was to reinstate the requirement for explicit approvals from CASA or authorised persons for such operations, while maintaining the evidentiary burden on the defendant in any related criminal prosecutions. The Office of Regulation Review assessed these amendments as minor, not necessitating a Regulation Impact Statement.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Amendment Regulations 2005 (No. 1) pertain to the Civil Aviation Act 1988 and are intended to correct inadvertent changes made during the process of harmonising the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 with the Criminal Code. These regulations apply to all persons and entities involved in the operation of experimental aircraft in Australia, specifically addressing operations at night, under instrument flight rules (IFR), or over built-up areas. The geographic scope of these regulations is confined to Australian territory, aligning with the jurisdictional reach of the Civil Aviation Act 1988. The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) retains its role in approving such operations, and the evidentiary burden of establishing the existence of such approvals remains with the defendant in any criminal prosecution. The Regulations do not introduce new exclusions or thresholds but correct previous regulatory oversights, ensuring that operations by experimental aircraft in specified conditions are lawful if expressly approved by CASA or an authorised person. The amendments do not require a Regulation Impact Statement and are considered minor and machinery in nature, as assessed by the Office of Regulation Review.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Amendment Regulations 2005 (No. 1) (the Regulations) amend the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR) to correct inadvertent changes made during a previous amendment. Specifically, regulation 3 of the Regulations amends subregulation 262AP (4) of the CAR to re-insert a provision permitting operations over a city or built-up area subject to authorisation by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) or an authorised person, such as an industry representative. This provision was inadvertently removed during the harmonisation process with the Criminal Code in 2003. Similarly, regulation 3 amends subregulation 262AP (6) to re-insert a provision granting operational flexibility subject to authorisation by CASA or an authorised person. The Regulations also delete subregulation 262AP (14) and subregulation 262AP (15) as these defence provisions are no longer relevant following the amendments to subregulation 262AP (4) and subregulation 262AP (6), respectively. The Regulations impose obligations on CASA and authorised persons to ensure that they continue to authorise operations in experimental aircraft under the instrument flight rules (IFR) at night, over built-up areas, and in other specified circumstances. These entities must also ensure that all approvals are clearly documented and readily available for inspection by CASA in the event of any enforcement action or prosecution. Operators of experimental aircraft must ensure that they obtain the necessary approvals before conducting any operations that are otherwise unlawful under the CAR. Furthermore, operators must maintain records of any approvals obtained and make these records available for inspection by CASA or other authorised persons. Breach of the amended provisions of the CAR can result in criminal penalties under the Civil Aviation Act 1988. Specifically, regulation 262AP (4) and regulation 262AP (6) carry a maximum penalty of 2,000 penalty units, or imprisonment for five years, or both, for individuals, and 10,000 penalty units for bodies corporate. The burden of proof in any prosecution for breach of these provisions remains with the defendant to establish the existence of an approval. The Regulations do not specify any additional penalties or consequences for breach beyond those already provided for in the Civil Aviation Act 1988.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Civil Aviation Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.