Civil Aviation Amendment Order (No. R71) 2004 - Civil Aviation Order 95.22 - Exemption from the provisions of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 - Float planes operating in prescribed access lanes (12/12/2004)

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2005B00905 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

CIVIL AVIATION REGULATIONS 1988

    

CIVIL AVIATION ORDERS

 

REVOCATION AND REPLACEMENT OF SECTION 95.22

 

EXEMPTION FROM PROVISIONS OF THE CIVIL AVIATION REGULATIONS 1988 — FLOAT PLANES OPERATING IN PRESCRIBED ACCESS LANES

 

Under subregulation 308 (1) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988), the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) may, among other things, exempt an aircraft from compliance with specified provisions of CAR 1988.  Subregulation 308 (3) provides that such an exemption is subject to the aircraft complying with any conditions specified by CASA as being necessary in the interests of safety. 

 

Subregulation 157 (1) of CAR 1988 sets out minimum heights below which an aircraft must not fly.

 

Section 95.22 of the Civil Aviation Orders contained an exemption from subregulation 157 (1). It permitted a fixed wing float equipped aeroplane to fly below what would otherwise be the minimum applicable height, when in operation in transit lanes or access lanes.  The aeroplane was required to comply with the procedures set out in the Aeronautical Information Publications.

 

This Order revokes and remakes section 95.22.  This has been done as part of a scheme to review the Civil Aviation Orders, and, in particular, to ensure that they are in a position to meet the technical requirements of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 when it comes into effect on 1 January 2005.  The remake does not involve any changes in existing law or policy in the Order.  The Order is being remade solely for the purpose of ensuring compliance and consistency with the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 when it commences on 1 January 2005.  However, the opportunity has been taken to update outdated references to legislation in the Order and to introduce gender-neutral wording into the Order.

 

The Office of Regulation Review has stated that a Regulation Impact Statement is not necessary because the remake is of a minor or machinery of government nature.

 

The Order has been issued by the Director of Aviation Safety in accordance with subsection 84A (2) of the Civil Aviation Act 1988.

 

The Order came into effect on gazettal.

 

[Civil Aviation Amendment Order (No. R71) 2004]

Overview

The Civil Aviation Amendment Order (No. R71) 2004, issued under the authority of the Director of Aviation Safety pursuant to subsection 84A(2) of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, addresses a gap in the Civil Aviation Orders by revoking and replacing section 95.22, which previously provided an exemption from certain provisions of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 for float planes operating in prescribed access lanes. This legislative action was part of a broader review of the Civil Aviation Orders to ensure compliance with the technical requirements of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, which commenced on 1 January 2005. The purpose of this Order was not to alter existing law or policy but to update outdated references and incorporate gender-neutral language, thereby enhancing the clarity and inclusivity of the regulations. The Office of Regulation Review deemed a Regulation Impact Statement unnecessary due to the minor and procedural nature of the changes. The Order came into effect on the date of its gazette.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Orders, specifically the Revocation and Replacement of Section 95.22 Exemption from Provisions of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988, applies to aircraft operators and pilots who are involved in the operation of fixed-wing float-equipped aeroplanes in transit and access lanes. This regulation is concerned with ensuring compliance with safety requirements while also providing exemptions under certain conditions as set out by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA). The application of this Order is within the Commonwealth jurisdiction, governed by the Civil Aviation Act 1988 and the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988). While the substantive legal provisions remain unchanged, the Order has been remade to ensure alignment with the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 and to modernise the language and references within the Order. The exemption continues to be subject to CASA’s conditions necessary for safety, as per subregulation 308(3) of CAR 1988. The Order came into effect on the date of gazettal and does not introduce any new substantive legal changes.

Key Provisions

The primary operative sections of this legislation, particularly section 95.22 of the Civil Aviation Orders, relate to the exemption of fixed-wing float-equipped aeroplanes from certain minimum flight height regulations when operating in transit or access lanes, as outlined in subregulation 157(1) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988). This exemption, as detailed in subregulation 308(1) of CAR 1988, allows the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to grant such exemptions provided the aircraft complies with any specified conditions deemed necessary for safety as per subregulation 308(3). The exemption requires adherence to the procedures outlined in the Aeronautical Information Publications, ensuring that safety standards are maintained during operations. The obligations imposed by this Act on the parties governed by it include the necessity for CASA to specify conditions for any exemption granted under subregulation 308(1). These conditions must be strictly adhered to by the operators of the exempted aircraft to ensure compliance with safety requirements. Operators of fixed-wing float-equipped aeroplanes must comply with the conditions set by CASA and follow the Aeronautical Information Publications to ensure that their operations meet safety standards, thereby maintaining the integrity of the exemption. Breach of the conditions specified by CASA for the exemption can result in various consequences. While the Act does not explicitly detail the specific offences or penalties for non-compliance, any deviation from the prescribed conditions could potentially lead to revocation of the exemption, which in turn would require compliance with the standard minimum flight height regulations. Such a breach could also attract other civil or criminal penalties as prescribed by the broader aviation regulations and relevant aviation safety laws, depending on the severity and impact of the non-compliance on aviation safety.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Administrative Law
Instrument
Order
Concepts
Delegated & Subordinate Legislation
Definitions & Interpretation
Transitional Provisions

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.