EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
CEO Determination No. 1 of 2010
Customs Act 1901
Subsection 126DA(1) of the Customs Act 1901 (the Customs Act) provides that after consulting with persons likely to be affected, the CEO must determine, and cause to be published in the Gazette:
a) the information technology requirements that have to be met by persons who wish to communicate with Customs electronically; and
b) the information technology requirements that have to be met to satisfy a requirement that a person's signature be given to Customs in connection with information when the information is communicated electronically; and
c) the information technology requirements that have to be met to satisfy a requirement that a document be produced to Customs when the document is produced electronically.
Subsection 126DA(2) allows the CEO to determine alternative information technology requirements that may be used including different information technology requirements that may be used in different circumstances or by different classes of persons.
Background and Instrument
Section 126DA was inserted into the Customs Act by the Customs Legislation Amendment and Repeal (International Trade Modernisation) Act 2001 (the ITM Act). The Customs Act was amended by the ITM Act to create the legal foundations for communicating electronically with Customs using the computer system known as the Integrated Cargo System (the ICS).
The Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO) has determined information technology requirements under subsection 126DA(1) so that all electronic communications (except movement applications made under section 119AA of the Customs Act) relating to the exportation of goods, the departure of ships and aircraft from Australia, imported goods and the arrival of ships and aircraft in Australia have to be made using the ICS. Movement applications made under section 119AA may be communicated to Customs using e-mail.
The ICS has been in operation since 2005 and initially did not contain the functionality whereby a claim for drawback could be electronically lodged with Customs and Border Protection. However, recent enhancements to the ICS now allow claims for drawback to be made electronically using the ICS.
The new Determination therefore extends the information technology requirements to the making of an electronic claim for drawback of import duty. Such claims must also be made using the ICS.
CEO Determination No. 1 of 2010 repeals and replaces CEO Determination No. 1 of 2006.
Part 2 of the Determination continues the requirement to use e-mail to communicate electronic movement applications under section 119AA of the Customs Act.
Part 3 of the Determination sets out the information technology requirements for all other electronic communications with Customs made under Division 3 or 4 of Part IV or Division 2 of Part VI and Part IX of the Customs Act. These information technology requirements describe how to use the ICS and have not changed from CEO Determination No. 1 of 2006.
Part 4 of the Determination sets out the information technology requirements that have to be met to satisfy a requirement that a document be produced to Customs when the document is produced electronically. These information technology requirements also have not changed from CEO Determination No. 1 of 2006.
Consultation
Customs and Border Protection has consulted extensively with people likely to be affected by this instrument, in accordance with section 126DA of the Customs Act.
Commencement
The instrument commences on the day after it is registered.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901 was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to regulate the importation and exportation of goods, as well as other related activities, ensuring compliance with customs laws and the collection of appropriate duties and taxes. The Customs Legislation Amendment and Repeal (International Trade Modernisation) Act 2001 introduced significant changes to the Customs Act, aiming to modernise international trade processes and enhance efficiency. One of these changes was the insertion of Section 126DA, which mandated the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Customs to determine the information technology requirements for electronic communication with Customs. This requirement was intended to streamline and formalise the digital interaction between Customs and various stakeholders. The CEO Determination No. 1 of 2010 was issued to specify these requirements, ensuring that all electronic communications, except for certain movement applications, must be conducted using the Integrated Cargo System (ICS). This determination also updated the system to include electronic claims for drawback of import duty, reflecting advancements in the ICS functionality. The policy objective behind these amendments is to facilitate smoother and more efficient electronic interactions with Customs, reducing administrative burdens and enhancing the overall customs process.
Scope and Application
CEO Determination No. 1 of 2010 applies to any person or entity engaging in activities related to the exportation of goods, the departure of ships and aircraft from Australia, imported goods, and the arrival of ships and aircraft in Australia, as well as to any person making a claim for drawback of import duty. This Determination governs the information technology requirements for electronic communications with Customs, as mandated by the Customs Act 1901. The Act applies on a national level across Australia, with the CEO empowered to set and publish these requirements in the Gazette after appropriate consultation with affected parties. The CEO has specified that electronic communications concerning customs matters, excluding movement applications under section 119AA of the Customs Act, must be made using the Integrated Cargo System (ICS). These requirements ensure a standardised and efficient process for electronic communications and transactions with Customs. The Determination also allows for alternative information technology requirements in specific circumstances or for different classes of persons, providing some flexibility within the framework. The instrument repeals and replaces the previous CEO Determination No. 1 of 2006, extending its scope to include electronic claims for drawback of import duty, which can now also be lodged using the ICS.
Key Provisions
The CEO Determination No. 1 of 2010, under section 126DA(1) of the Customs Act 1901, outlines the information technology requirements that must be met for various electronic communications with Customs. These requirements pertain to the electronic communication of information related to the exportation of goods, the departure of ships and aircraft from Australia, imported goods, and the arrival of ships and aircraft in Australia. Specifically, these communications must be made using the Integrated Cargo System (ICS), with the exception of movement applications under section 119AA, which can be communicated via email. Additionally, the Determination extends the ICS usage to include electronic claims for drawback of import duty, which were previously not supported by the system. This determination replaces and repeals the previous CEO Determination No. 1 of 2006, ensuring that all electronic communications align with the updated requirements.
Entities and individuals governed by the Customs Act are required to adhere to the specified information technology requirements when communicating electronically with Customs. This includes ensuring that all electronic communications, except for those specified under section 119AA, are made using the ICS. For movement applications under section 119AA, email is permitted as the medium of communication. Furthermore, any electronic documents or signatures provided to Customs must comply with the stipulated requirements, which ensure the integrity and security of the electronic information. These requirements are designed to facilitate efficient and secure electronic communication, thereby streamlining customs processes.
Failure to comply with the information technology requirements set out in the CEO Determination No. 1 of 2010 may result in various consequences. While the legislation does not explicitly detail specific offences, penalties, or consequences for non-compliance, it is reasonable to infer that breaches may lead to administrative actions or legal consequences under the broader Customs Act 1901. Non-compliance could potentially impact the efficiency and security of electronic communications with Customs, leading to delays, errors, or other administrative issues. Therefore, it is crucial for all parties to adhere to the specified requirements to avoid any adverse outcomes.