Cash Transaction Reports Regulations (Amendment) 1991 No. 89
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
STATUTORY RULES 1991 No. 89
Cash Transaction Reports Act 1988
Cash Transaction Reports Regulations (Amendment)
Section 43 of the Cash Transaction Reports Act 1988 ("the Act") provides that the Governor-General may make regulations for the purposes of the Act.
Under subsections 18(2) and 19(2A) of the Act, where a person opens or becomes the signatory of an account with a cash dealer, the account becomes blocked to withdrawals until the procedures provided under the Act and the Regulations for the verification of the identity of the person have been carried out.
Under subsection 18(5) of the Act, where an account becomes blocked under subsection 18(2) a cash dealer commits an offence unless, at the end of the day following the day that an account is blocked, the cash dealer gives the Cash Transaction Reports Agency ("the CTRA") written notice containing details of the blocked account.
Under subsection 18(5A) of the Act, where an account becomes blocked under subsection 18(2A), a cash dealer, who has been declared an identifying cash dealer under section 8A of the Act, commits an offence at the end of 14 days after the account becomes blocked, unless the identifying cash dealer gives the CTRA written notice of the blocked account. An identifying cash dealer is a cash dealer approved by the CTRA for the purpose of carrying out certain verification of identity checks to facilitate the opening and operation of an account.
Under paragraphs 18(10)(c) and (d) of the Act, regulations may prescribe:
• a day instead of the end of the day following the day that the account is blocked as specified in subsection 18(5); or
• a period instead of the period of 14 days specified in subsection 18(5A).
The purpose of the Cash Transaction Reports Regulations (Amendment) is to prescribe a period of 21 days in each case.
Under subsection 18(7) of the Act once an account becomes unblocked, because the verification procedures have been carried out, the cash dealer is then required to give notice of the unblocking to the CTRA within 14 days of the completion of the verification procedures.
Extending the periods under which notice of blocking must be given under subsections 18(5) and (5A) of the Act to 21 days, will, in many cases, enable cash dealers to give the notices of the blocking and subsequent unblocking of the account at the same time. This will enable the CTRA to identify immediately those accounts for which subsequent proceedings for forfeiture under section 19 of the Act cannot arise, and which are less likely to be associated with criminal activity.
The Cash Transaction Reports Regulations (Amendment) add a new Regulation 11B to the Cash Transaction Reports Regulations.
Details of the Regulations are as follows:
Regulation 1.1: This regulation is a formal provision identifying the Principal Regulations.
Regulation 2.1: This regulation inserts a new regulation 11B into the Principal Regulations as follows:
(i) Subregulation 11B(1) which prescribes, for the purposes of subsection 18(5) of the Act, the period of 21 days instead of the day first referred to in that subsection;
(ii) Subregulation 11B(2) which prescribes, for the purposes of subsection 18(5A) of the Act, the period of 21 days instead of the period specified in that subsection.
Attorney-General
Overview
The Cash Transaction Reports Regulations (Amendment) 1991, made under the authority of Section 43 of the Cash Transaction Reports Act 1988, were enacted to address the need for more efficient reporting processes concerning the blocking of accounts by cash dealers. These regulations were introduced by the Parliament of Australia and aim to streamline the notification process for both the blocking and unblocking of accounts, thereby reducing administrative burdens and improving the effectiveness of the Cash Transaction Reports Agency (CTRA) in identifying accounts less likely to be associated with criminal activity. The primary policy objective is to extend the notification periods from the originally stipulated end-of-day following the day of account blocking, or from 14 days for identifying cash dealers, to a uniform 21 days. This extension allows cash dealers to consolidate their reporting, facilitating more efficient monitoring and reducing the likelihood of accounts being involved in unlawful activities.
Scope and Application
The Cash Transaction Reports Regulations (Amendment) 1991 No. 89 apply to cash dealers who are required to block accounts under the Cash Transaction Reports Act 1988 until the identity of the account holder has been verified. These Regulations extend the timeframe in which a cash dealer must notify the Cash Transaction Reports Agency of a blocked account from the end of the following day to 21 days, thereby aligning the periods for notification of blocked and unblocked accounts. The amendment applies to all cash dealers within Australia, as the Act is of Commonwealth jurisdiction. The Regulations do not exclude or exempt any particular entity or class of transactions from their scope. However, they may be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments made under the authority of the Act. The objective of these changes is to streamline the notification process for cash dealers and enhance the efficiency of the Cash Transaction Reports Agency in monitoring accounts for potential criminal activity.
Key Provisions
The Cash Transaction Reports Regulations (Amendment) 1991 No. 89 introduces changes to the Cash Transaction Reports Regulations by extending the notice period for cash dealers to report blocked accounts to the Cash Transaction Reports Agency (CTRA). According to section 43 of the Cash Transaction Reports Act 1988, the Governor-General can make regulations for the purposes of the Act. Under the Act, an account becomes blocked to withdrawals until the identity verification procedures have been carried out, as per subsections 18(2) and 19(2A). When an account is blocked, the cash dealer must notify the CTRA in writing within a specified period. Initially, this period was the end of the day following the day that the account was blocked (subsection 18(5)) or 14 days after the account was blocked for identifying cash dealers (subsection 18(5A)).
The amendment introduces Regulation 11B, extending these notification periods to 21 days. Subregulation 11B(1) specifies the 21-day period for general cash dealers under subsection 18(5), while subregulation 11B(2) specifies the same period for identifying cash dealers under subsection 18(5A). These changes are intended to streamline the notification process, allowing cash dealers to report both the blocking and unblocking of accounts simultaneously. This will help the CTRA to more efficiently identify accounts that are less likely to be associated with criminal activity and are eligible for unblocking, facilitating better oversight and regulation.
The amendment imposes specific obligations on cash dealers. Under the Act, a cash dealer must give the CTRA written notice of a blocked account within 21 days. This requirement applies to both general cash dealers and identifying cash dealers, as extended by the amendment. This notice must detail the blocked account and include relevant information for the CTRA to assess the account’s status and take appropriate action. Once the identity verification procedures are completed, and the account is unblocked, the cash dealer must notify the CTRA within 14 days of the unblocking, as per subsection 18(7) of the Act.
Breaching these obligations can lead to significant legal consequences. Under the Act, a cash dealer commits an offence if they fail to notify the CTRA of a blocked account within the stipulated period. For general cash dealers, this offence occurs at the end of the day following the blocking if they do not provide notice within 21 days as per the amendment. Similarly, identifying cash dealers commit an offence if they do not provide notice within 21 days after the account is blocked. These offences carry penalties that may include fines or other sanctions as determined by the relevant courts. The precise penalties are not specified in the amendment but would be guided by the provisions of the Act and applicable law.