Explanatory Statement
Civil Aviation Regulations 1988
Exemption — of authorised flying instructors employed by Singapore Flying College Pte Ltd
Legislation
Section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) provides that the Governor-General may make regulations for the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation.
Paragraph 308 (1) (b) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988) provides that CASA may, in relation to a particular aircraft or specified type or category of aircraft, exempt persons from compliance with specified provisions of CAR 1988 while they are in, on, or otherwise associated with the operation of, that aircraft, or aircraft of the specified type or category. Subregulation 308 (3) provides that CASA is authorised to give an exemption subject to any condition specified in the exemption as being necessary in the interests of safety.
Paragraph 5.70 (1) (a) of CAR 1988 provides that if a student pilot has not passed a general flying progress flight test for the category of aircraft that the student proposes to fly, an authorised flight instructor must not permit the student to fly as pilot in command of an aircraft for more than 3 consecutive hours of flight time in aircraft of that category unless, after each period of 3 hours, the student has undertaken dual flying in an aircraft of that category.
The Singapore Flying College Pte Ltd (the College) holds an Air Operator’s Certificate authorising domestic flying training operations. The College’s flying training syllabus permits student pilots to fly as pilot in command of an aircraft for more than 3 consecutive hours. This is inconsistent with the requirement in paragraph 5.70 (1) (a) of CAR 1988.
This instrument exempts authorised flying instructors employed by the College from compliance with paragraph 5.70 (1) (a) of CAR 1988 when conducting flying training.
The College has demonstrated for more than a decade that it can safely conduct student flying training operations in accordance with its syllabus of flying training and trains Singapore Airlines staff who, upon completion of training, return to Singapore to obtain the appropriate licence. The instrument expressly states that the exemption only applies to students seeking a Singapore commercial pilot’s licence.
The exemption is subject to conditions which are considered necessary in the interests of safety. Under these conditions, the flying training must be conducted in Cessna 172 and Beechcraft 58 type aircraft, the student pilots of the College must have a minimum of 20 hours’ aeronautical experience and the training must be conducted only for the purposes of the authorised flying instructors’ employment by the College. The instrument also stipulates a 15 hour limit on solo flying without a dual check.
Legislative Instruments Act
Subregulation 308 (4) of CAR 1988 declares an exemption to be a disallowable instrument. Under subparagraph 6 (d) (i) of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (the LIA), an instrument is a legislative instrument for section 5 of the LIA if it is declared to be a disallowable instrument under legislation in force before the commencement of the LIA. The exemption is, therefore, a legislative instrument and it is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the LIA.
Consultation
Consultation under section 17 of the LIA has not been undertaken because the instrument applies only to the College and remakes a previous instrument, CASA EX78/08, with clarification of the previous conditions.
The exemption commences on the day of registration. It stops having effect at the end of November 2012.
The exemption has been made by a delegate of CASA under subregulation 7 (1) of CAR 1988.
[Instrument number CASA EX96/10]
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988) were amended in 2010 to provide an exemption to the Singapore Flying College Pte Ltd from certain requirements for student pilots under paragraph 5.70(1)(a). The Civil Aviation Act 1988 authorised the Governor-General to make regulations in the interests of air navigation safety, and Section 98 of this Act allows for exemptions to be granted by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) if they are deemed necessary for safety. The specific problem this legislation addresses is the inconsistency between the College's training syllabus, which permits student pilots to fly as pilot in command for more than 3 consecutive hours, and the regulatory requirement in CAR 1988 that an authorised flight instructor must not permit a student to fly for more than 3 consecutive hours unless dual flying occurs after each period of 3 hours. The policy objective of the exemption is to ensure that the College can safely continue its training operations while maintaining high safety standards. The exemption is subject to conditions that are considered necessary for safety and applies only to students seeking a Singapore commercial pilot's licence.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988) under the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) apply to various entities and individuals involved in civil aviation activities within Australia. This specific regulation pertains to authorised flying instructors employed by Singapore Flying College Pte Ltd, a company authorised to conduct domestic flying training operations in Australia. The exemption granted in this instance applies solely to the College and its authorised flying instructors when conducting flying training, specifically for students seeking a Singapore commercial pilot's licence. The exemption allows these instructors to deviate from the general requirement that student pilots must not fly as pilot in command for more than 3 consecutive hours unless they have undergone dual flying after each 3-hour period, as stipulated in paragraph 5.70(1)(a) of the CAR 1988. This exemption is contingent upon several safety conditions, including the type of aircraft used (Cessna 172 and Beechcraft 58), a minimum of 20 hours' aeronautical experience for student pilots, and a 15-hour limit on solo flying without a dual check. The exemption is also geographically confined to Australia, where the College conducts its operations. It is important to note that the exemption is subject to disallowance under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 and will cease to have effect by the end of November 2012.
Key Provisions
The key provisions of this legislation relate to the exemption granted to authorised flying instructors employed by the Singapore Flying College Pte Ltd (the College) from certain requirements of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988). Specifically, the exemption (paragraph 308(1)(b) of CAR 1988) allows these instructors to conduct flying training operations that would otherwise be prohibited under paragraph 5.70(1)(a) of CAR 1988, which generally requires dual flying after every three hours of flight time for student pilots who have not passed a general flying progress flight test. This exemption is granted to enable the College to continue its training operations, which have been conducted safely over more than a decade, in accordance with its specific syllabus, and to train student pilots who will eventually obtain a Singapore commercial pilot’s licence.
The Act imposes specific obligations and conditions on the parties involved. The authorised flying instructors employed by the College must adhere to strict conditions to ensure safety, including the restriction that flying training must be conducted only in Cessna 172 and Beechcraft 58 type aircraft. Additionally, student pilots must have a minimum of 20 hours of aeronautical experience and solo flying is limited to 15 hours without a dual check. The exemption applies only to training conducted for the purposes of the authorised flying instructors’ employment by the College and it strictly pertains to students seeking a Singapore commercial pilot’s licence.
Failure to comply with the conditions stipulated in the exemption may lead to significant consequences. As a legislative instrument, the exemption is subject to disallowance in the Parliament under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. Any breach of the conditions could potentially be viewed as a violation of safety regulations, which might result in civil or criminal penalties. While the specific penalties are not detailed in the text, violations of civil aviation regulations generally carry significant fines and other penalties as prescribed under relevant legislation.
Given the nature of the exemption and the critical importance of aviation safety, adherence to the conditions is paramount. Non-compliance could not only result in the revocation of the exemption but also in other regulatory actions against the College or the individuals involved. The exemption, having been registered, is effective from the date of registration and will cease to have effect at the end of November 2012, unless extended or renewed under the relevant legislative framework.