CASA EX90/15 - Exemption — recording time-in-service, Determination — non-application of part of CAO 100.5

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2015L00742 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Explanatory Statement

Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998

Exemption  recording time-in-service

Determination — non-application of part of CAO 100.5

 

Purpose

The purpose of this instrument is to exempt a Class A aircraft owner, aircraft operator and the pilot in command from the requirement in the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988) to record total time-in-service of the Class A aircraft after each completed day of flying operations. The instrument also determines, in accordance with Civil Aviation Order 100.5 (CAO 100.5) as applicable to Australian aircraft, that the person signing the maintenance release will not have to record details with respect to total time-in-service. These requirements are not necessary or appropriate to larger airlines with highly complex computerised infrastructure.

 

The instrument replaces CASA EX90/12 which was issued for the same purpose and expired at the end of June 2015.

 

Legislation — CAR 1988

Section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) empowers the Governor-General to make regulations for the Act and the safety of air navigation.

 

Under subregulation 43B (1) of CAR 1988, it is an offence if, on completion of a day’s flying operations, the owner, operator or pilot in command of the aircraft fails to record on the maintenance release the total timeinservice of the aircraft on that day.

 

Subregulation 11.160 (1) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) provides that, for subsection 98 (5A) of the Act, CASA may grant an exemption from a provision of the Regulations, or a provision of the Civil Aviation Orders, in relation to a matter mentioned in that subsection. Under subregulation 11.160 (2), an exemption may be granted to a person, or to a class of persons, and may specify the class by reference to membership of a specified body or any other characteristic.

 

Under subregulation 11.205 (1) of CASR 1998, CASA may impose conditions on an exemption if this is necessary in the interests of the safety of air navigation. Under regulation 11.225 of CASR 1998, an exemption must be published on the Internet. Under subregulation 11.230 (1), an exemption ceases on the day specified within it (but no longer than 3 years after its commencement) or, if no day is specified, 3 years after commencement.

 

Background

The larger airlines have, generally across industry, highly complex computerised infrastructures to control and manage aircraft maintenance. Regulation 43B of CAR 1988 presented these airlines with considerable difficulty because their computer programs are not programmed to record this particular information and would require substantial alteration to enable compliance with regulation 43B. The kind of information involved is provided in an alternative form through the aircraft’s approved system of maintenance.

In these circumstances, CASA considers that the requirement for daily recording of time-in-service for each Class A aircraft is neither necessary nor appropriate.

 

Instrument — exemption

The instrument exempts the owner, operator and pilot in command of a Class A aircraft from the specific time-in-service recording requirements of regulation 43B of CAR 1988. Class A aircraft is defined in regulation 2 of CAR 1988 as Australian aircraft certificated in the transport category or used under an Air Operator’s Certificate that authorises regular public transport operations.

 

Conditions

The exemption is subject to conditions. The operator of the aircraft must ensure that the time-in-service for the aircraft that is necessary to meet the continuing airworthiness requirements of the aircraft is recorded and the record is kept uptodate. The operator must also include details of the recording method in the operator’s maintenance control manual prepared for regulation 42ZY of CAR 1988.

 

Legislation — CAO 100.5

Under subregulation 43 (1) of CAR 1988, maintenance releases for Australian aircraft may only be issued in the manner and form that CASA directs or approves. Under subregulation 43 (2), CASA may give directions specifying the information to be entered on a maintenance release before it is issued. Under subregulation 5 (1), where CASA has power to issue directions it may do so in Civil Aviation Orders. Paragraph 6.5 of CAO 100.5 contains directions specifying the information to be entered on a maintenance release.

 

Subparagraphs 6.5 (d), (e) and (f) of CAO 100.5 set out requirements to record timein-service and related information which, for the reasons mentioned above, are neither necessary nor appropriate for Class A aircraft.

 

Under paragraph 1.2 of CAO 100.5, CASA may issue a determination that a provision of CAO 100.5 does not apply to specified Australian aircraft. Under paragraph 1.3 of CAO 100.5, before making a determination, CASA must take into account any relevant safety considerations. Using this power, CASA has determined in the instrument that subparagraphs 6.5 (d), (e) and (f) of CAO 100.5 do not apply to Class A aircraft. The information that would otherwise be required to be recorded under subparagraphs 6.5 (d), (e) and (f) of CAO 100.5 is adequately dealt with under the conditions for the exemption. Hence, the exemption and the determination are combined in the same instrument.

 

CASA does not consider that the exemption or the determination will have a detrimental effect on the safety of air navigation.

 

Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (the LIA)

For subsection 98 (5A) of the Act, CASA may, by instrument, grant an exemption from compliance with a provision of the regulations or Civil Aviation Orders. An instrument issued under paragraph 98 (5A) (a) of the Act is a legislative instrument if the instrument is expressed to apply to a class of persons or aircraft. The exemption applies to a class of aircraft and a class of persons. The exemption is, therefore, a legislative instrument and is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the LIA.

Consultation

Consultation under section 17 of the LIA has not been undertaken in this case. The exemption is a reissue of a previous instrument on this subject (CASA EX90/12 refers) and is a widely accepted industry exemption.

 

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights is at Attachment 1.

 

Office of Best Practice Regulation (OBPR)

A Regulation Impact Statement (RIS) is not required because the instrument is covered by a standing agreement between CASA and OBPR under which a RIS is not required (OBPR id: 14507).

 

Making and commencement

The instrument has been made by a delegate of CASA relying on the power of delegation under subregulation 11.260 (1) of CASR 1998.

 

The exemption commences on 1 July 2015 and expires at the end of May 2018, as if it had been repealed by another instrument.

 

[Instrument number CASA EX90/15]

Attachment 1

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011

Exemption — recording time-in-service

Determination — non-application of part of CAO 100.5

This legislative instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the legislative instrument

The purpose of the legislative instrument is to exempt Class A aircraft, aircraft owners, aircraft operators and pilots in command from time-in-service recording requirements specified in the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 and Civil Aviation Order 100.5. The requirements are not necessary or applicable to larger airlines with sophisticated computer infrastructure.

 

The instrument is subject to conditions that CASA has imposed in the interests of aviation safety, including conditions on keeping records of time-in-service up-to-date and recording the method for doing so in the operator’s maintenance control manual.

 

Human rights implications

This legislative instrument does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.

 

Conclusion

This legislative instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues.

Civil Aviation Safety Authority

Overview

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, as amended by the instrument F2015L00742, introduce an exemption for Class A aircraft owners, operators, and pilots in command from the requirement to record the total time-in-service of the aircraft after each day of flying operations. This exemption was enacted to address the impracticality of such a requirement for larger airlines equipped with advanced computerised infrastructures, which already manage aircraft maintenance information in alternative forms. The instrument also determines that the Civil Aviation Order 100.5 will not apply to the recording of time-in-service by the person signing the maintenance release for Class A aircraft, given that this information is already adequately managed. The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) issued this instrument under the authority granted by the Civil Aviation Act 1988, with the primary policy objective of maintaining aviation safety without imposing unnecessary burdens on operators with sophisticated maintenance management systems. The exemption is subject to conditions that ensure the necessary time-in-service records are kept up-to-date and detailed in the operator’s maintenance control manual.

Scope and Application

The instrument issued under the Civil Aviation Act 1988 exempts the owner, operator, and pilot in command of Class A aircraft from the requirement to record the total time-in-service of the aircraft after each day of flying operations. This exemption applies to aircraft that are certificated in the transport category or used under an Air Operator’s Certificate that authorises regular public transport operations. The exemption is necessary as the existing regulatory requirements for time-in-service recording present considerable difficulty for larger airlines due to their sophisticated computerised infrastructures, which are not programmed to record this specific information and would require substantial alteration for compliance. The instrument is subject to conditions to ensure that the time-in-service for the aircraft necessary to meet continuing airworthiness requirements is recorded and kept up-to-date, and that details of the recording method are included in the operator’s maintenance control manual. Additionally, the instrument determines that certain provisions of Civil Aviation Order 100.5, which specify information to be entered on a maintenance release, do not apply to Class A aircraft for the same reasons outlined above. The exemption is applicable to the Commonwealth and is a legislative instrument, subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) include a provision exempting Class A aircraft owners, operators, and pilots in command from the requirement to record total time-in-service of the aircraft after each completed day of flying operations. This exemption is detailed in subregulation 11.160(1) of the CASR 1998 and applies to aircraft defined under regulation 2 of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988) as Australian aircraft certificated in the transport category or used under an Air Operator’s Certificate that authorises regular public transport operations. The instrument also exempts the person signing the maintenance release from recording details with respect to total time-in-service, as stipulated in subparagraphs 6.5(d), (e), and (f) of Civil Aviation Order 100.5 (CAO 100.5). This legislation imposes specific obligations on the entities it governs. The aircraft operator must ensure that the time-in-service necessary to meet continuing airworthiness requirements is recorded and kept up-to-date. Additionally, the operator must include details of the recording method in the operator’s maintenance control manual, as required under regulation 42ZY of CAR 1988. This ensures that the necessary information for maintaining airworthiness is still captured and managed effectively, albeit not in the manner specified by the regulations for smaller aircraft. In terms of enforcement and consequences, under subregulation 43B(1) of CAR 1988, it is an offence if the owner, operator, or pilot in command fails to record the total time-in-service of the aircraft on the maintenance release after each day’s flying operations. However, the exemption provided by this instrument absolves the specified Class A aircraft operators and pilots from this requirement, provided they adhere to the conditions imposed by CASA. Any breach of the conditions could potentially lead to enforcement actions by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to ensure compliance with the safety standards. The instrument itself does not specify criminal or civil penalties but refers to the existing regulatory framework under CAR 1988, which could impose fines or other penalties for non-compliance with safety regulations.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Aviation Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Exemptions & Exclusions
Regulatory Standards
Compliance Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.