Explanatory Statement
Civil Aviation Regulations 1988
Exemption — from standard take-off minima – Eastern Australia Airlines
Legislation
Section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) empowers the Governor-General to make regulations for the Act and the safety of air navigation.
Under subregulation 257 (1) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988), CASA may determine the meteorological minima, that is the visibility requirements, for landing or take-off at an aerodrome. Under subregulation 257 (2), the determination must be published in AIP or NOTAMS. Under subregulation 257 (3), it is an offence for an aircraft to take off if an element of the meteorological minima for that operation is less than that determined for the aircraft at the aerodrome.
The determination of standard meteorological minima for take-off and landing was made in instrument CASA 237/10. The minima are also set out in AIP En Route 1.5, sections 4.3 and 4.4. If conditions are met, the minimum visibility for take-off inside or outside Australian territory is 550 metres. An exemption would be required to operate in lesser minimum visibility.
Under subregulation 308 (1) of CAR 1988, CASA may exempt aircraft, or persons in, on, or otherwise associated with the operation of, the aircraft, from compliance with specified provisions of CAR 1988. Under subregulation 308 (2), before making an exemption, CASA must take into account any relevant considerations relating to the interests of safety. Under subregulation 308 (3), CASA may make an exemption subject to any condition specified in the exemption as being necessary in the interests of safety. Under subregulation 308 (3A), it is an offence to contravene a condition of an exemption that is otherwise being relied upon for an operation.
The exemption exempts DHC 8 aeroplanes operated by Eastern Australia Airlines Pty Limited (EAA) from the standard meteorological minima for take‑off. Following a review of the rules governing low visibility operations, new exemptions have been issued to various operators allowing them to use lower minima than was previously the case. This exemption states the lower minima for the aeroplanes, in respect of low visibility take-offs, as well as the conditions for their use. For instance, the use of the lower minima will require a higher standard of runway lighting (see clause 7 in Schedule 2).
Since this is the first low visibility exemption issued to EAA, the specified minima are higher than those mentioned in similar exemptions
In essence, EAA must ensure that specified visibility standards are met for take-offs and landings that may be performed only at aerodromes properly equipped to support the low visibility operations conducted under the exemption. Flight crew training, experience, recency and competency must meet specified benchmarks. Aircraft equipment must be maintained. Operational restrictions and limitations must be observed. Appropriate foreign approvals for the operations must be obtained. A range of documents for inspection must be carried on board the aircraft.
Legislative Instruments Act
Under subparagraph 6 (d) (i) of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (the LIA), an instrument is a legislative instrument for section 5 of the LIA if it is declared to be a disallowable instrument under legislation in force before the commencement of the LIA. Under subregulation 308 (4) of CAR 1988, an exemption is a disallowable instrument. The exemption is, therefore, a legislative instrument and it is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the LIA.
Consultation
Consultation under section 17 of the LIA has not been undertaken in this case. The instrument is required by EAA to enable low visibility take-offs inside and outside Australian territory consistent with the standards and requirements specified in the instrument which are not considered prejudicial to the interests of safety.
Office of Best Practice Regulation (OBPR)
The exemption would be of beneficial effect to EAA. The OBPR does not require preparation of a Regulation Impact Statement in this case because a preliminary assessment of business compliance costs in the context of the nature of similar instruments indicates that it will have only a nil to low impact on business.
Duration
The instrument commences on the day after it is registered. It stops having effect at the end of 31 October 2012.
The exemption has been made by the Director of Aviation Safety, on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 73 (2) of the Act.
[Instrument number CASA EX90/10]
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988) have been amended to provide an exemption for Eastern Australia Airlines (EAA) from the standard meteorological minima for take-off in low visibility conditions. Enacted to address the specific operational needs of EAA, this exemption allows the airline to conduct take-offs in conditions of lesser visibility than those prescribed under standard regulations, provided certain safety conditions are met. The exemption was introduced by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) under the authority granted by section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, which empowers CASA to make regulations for the safety of air navigation. The policy objective of the exemption is to enhance operational efficiency for EAA while maintaining high safety standards. The exemption is subject to conditions that include higher standards of runway lighting, specific flight crew qualifications, and operational restrictions, among other requirements. This legislative instrument is subject to disallowance in the Parliament under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988) provide the legal framework for regulating civil aviation in Australia, and under the Civil Aviation Act 1988, the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) is tasked with ensuring the safety of air navigation, among other responsibilities. The specific legislation in question, F2010L02749, pertains to an exemption issued to Eastern Australia Airlines Pty Limited (EAA) from the standard meteorological minima for take-off, thereby allowing the airline to conduct take-offs under lower visibility conditions than the standard 550 metres, provided certain conditions are met. This exemption is designed to enhance operational flexibility for EAA while maintaining the highest safety standards. The exemption applies to EAA and its DHC 8 aeroplanes and is subject to conditions that ensure safety, including specific requirements for runway lighting, flight crew qualifications, aircraft maintenance, and operational limitations. These conditions are detailed in the exemption and must be adhered to for the operations to remain compliant. The exemption is applicable across both Australian and international territories and is subject to the tabling and disallowance provisions of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. It is effective from the day after its registration and expires on 31 October 2012.
Key Provisions
The key operative sections of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988) that are relevant to this exemption relate to the setting of meteorological minima for take-off and landing, and the granting of exemptions from these minima. Section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) empowers the Governor-General to make regulations for the Act, and the safety of air navigation. Subregulation 257(1) of the CAR 1988 provides that the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) may determine the meteorological minima for landing or take-off at an aerodrome, which must be published in the Aeronautical Information Publication (AIP) or NOTAMS (subregulation 257(2)). Subregulation 257(3) makes it an offence for an aircraft to take off if an element of the meteorological minima for that operation is less than that determined for the aircraft at the aerodrome. Subregulation 308(1) of the CAR 1988 allows CASA to exempt aircraft, or persons in, on, or otherwise associated with the operation of, the aircraft, from compliance with specified provisions of the CAR 1988, subject to conditions that are necessary in the interests of safety (subregulation 308(2) and (3)). Subregulation 308(3A) makes it an offence to contravene a condition of an exemption that is otherwise being relied upon for an operation.
This exemption imposes certain obligations and requirements on Eastern Australia Airlines (EAA) and its employees. EAA must ensure that specified visibility standards are met for take-offs and landings that may be performed only at aerodromes properly equipped to support the low visibility operations conducted under the exemption. Flight crew training, experience, recency and competency must meet specified benchmarks. Aircraft equipment must be maintained. Operational restrictions and limitations must be observed. Appropriate foreign approvals for the operations must be obtained. A range of documents for inspection must be carried on board the aircraft. The exemption is also subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (the LIA).
Breach of the conditions of the exemption may result in civil or criminal consequences. Subregulation 308(3A) of the CAR 1988 makes it an offence to contravene a condition of an exemption that is otherwise being relied upon for an operation. The maximum penalties for aviation offences are set out in section 5 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988. For example, an individual who contravenes a provision of the Act or the regulations may be liable to a fine of up to $21,000 (or up to 200 penalty units if the penalty is expressed in terms of penalty units) and/or imprisonment for up to two years. A corporation that contravenes a provision of the Act or the regulations may be liable to a fine of up to $105,000 (or up to 1,000 penalty units if the penalty is expressed in terms of penalty units). The maximum penalties for breaches of the CAR 1988 are set out in Schedule 1 to the regulations. For example, an aircraft operator who contravenes a provision of the regulations may be liable to a fine of up to $10,500 (or up to 100 penalty units if the penalty is expressed in terms of penalty units).