Explanatory Statement
Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998
Exemption — to produce a modification or replacement part
Legislation
Subsection 98 (1) of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) provides that the Governor-General may make regulations for the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation.
Under subregulation 11.160 (1) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998), CASA may grant an exemption from compliance with a provision of CASR 1998. Under subregulation 11.160 (2), the exemption may be for a class of persons and may specify the class by reference to membership of a specified body or any other characteristic. Under subregulation 11.160 (3), CASA may grant an exemption on application or on its own initiative.
Under regulation 21.305 of CASR 1998, whenever a material, part, process or appliance (an article) is required to be approved under CASR 1998, it may be approved under, among other things, an Australian Parts Manufacturer Approval (APMA), or in any other manner approved by CASA (paragraph 21.305 (e)). Such other approved manner for approving is the issue of a CASA approval for the article. When such an approval is issued, it must be complied with rather than, for example, the APMA.
Under subregulation 21.303 (1) of CASR 1998, it is an offence for a person to produce a modification or replacement part for sale or installation on a type certificated aircraft, aircraft engine or propeller unless it is produced in accordance with an APMA issued under Subpart 21.K of CASR 1998.
The exemption offers an alternative means of compliance for such modification or replacement through the approval process mentioned above. The exemption is made by CASA, on its own initiative, for the class of persons who produce a modification or replacement part for sale or installation on a type certificated aircraft, aircraft engine or propeller (the manufacturers). The exemption exempts such manufacturers from the requirements of subregulation 21.303 (1) of CASR 1998 if they comply instead with an approval issued in accordance with paragraph 21.305 (e) or subregulation 21.305A (2).
Legislative Instruments Act
Regulation 11.215 of CASR 1998 declares an exemption of this kind to be a disallowable instrument. Under subparagraph 6 (d) (i) of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (the LIA), an instrument is a legislative instrument for section 5 of the LIA if it is declared to be a disallowable instrument under legislation in force before the commencement of the LIA. The exemption is, therefore, a legislative instrument and it is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the LIA.
Consultation
Consultation under section 17 of the LIA has not been undertaken in this case. The instrument is for the benefit of the manufacturers by providing an alternative means of compliance with appropriate safety standards for the production of a modification or replacement part.
The instrument commences on 1 November 2010 and stops having effect at the end of October 2011.
The exemption has been made by a delegate of CASA under subregulation 7 (1) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988.
[Instrument number CASA EX88/10]
Overview
The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) were amended by F2010L02639 to provide an exemption for manufacturers of modifications or replacement parts for type certificated aircraft, engines, or propellers. Enacted in 2010, this instrument was designed to address the need for a streamlined compliance process for manufacturers, ensuring they meet safety standards without being strictly bound to an Australian Parts Manufacturer Approval (APMA). Instead, these manufacturers can comply by obtaining a CASA approval under CASR 1998, offering a practical alternative to adhere to safety regulations. The exemption was introduced by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) on its own initiative, aiming to benefit the manufacturers by providing them with an alternative means of compliance. This legislative instrument is subject to disallowance under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, although no consultation was undertaken in this instance. The exemption was effective from 1 November 2010 until the end of October 2011.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) grant the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) the authority to exempt certain classes of persons from specific regulatory requirements, provided they meet alternative safety standards. This particular exemption, as outlined in the explanatory statement, applies to manufacturers who produce modifications or replacement parts intended for sale or installation on type certificated aircraft, engines, or propellers. These manufacturers are exempt from the usual compliance requirements of subregulation 21.303(1) of the CASR 1998 if they instead comply with an approval issued under paragraph 21.305(e) or subregulation 21.305A(2). This exemption allows for flexibility in compliance, ensuring that safety standards are maintained through alternate means of approval. The exemption is applicable across Australia, reflecting the national scope of aviation safety regulation. The exemption is subject to disallowance in Parliament under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, but no consultation was undertaken in this instance as the changes primarily benefit manufacturers by providing an alternative pathway to compliance. The exemption is effective from 1 November 2010 until the end of October 2011.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) relevant to this exemption include subregulation 11.160 (subsection 98(1) of the Civil Aviation Act 1988), which provides the authority for the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to grant exemptions from compliance with CASR 1998 provisions. Regulation 21.305, which details the various ways an article can be approved, including through a CASA approval, and subregulation 21.303(1), which stipulates the offence of producing a modification or replacement part without the requisite approval. The exemption under consideration, detailed in subregulation 21.303(1), allows manufacturers to avoid the requirement to comply with an Australian Parts Manufacturer Approval (APMA) if they instead adhere to a CASA approval.
The obligations imposed by this Act on the parties it governs primarily involve the manufacturers of modifications or replacement parts for type certificated aircraft, engines, or propellers. These manufacturers must now ensure their production processes are approved by CASA under the specified conditions. This includes adhering to any CASA approval issued in accordance with paragraph 21.305(e) or subregulation 21.305A(2), thereby providing an alternative compliance pathway that aligns with safety standards while circumventing the need for an APMA. By doing so, manufacturers can maintain compliance with the overarching safety objectives of CASR 1998 without the direct constraints of the APMA requirements.
Offences and penalties under CASR 1998 are clearly outlined, particularly in subregulation 21.303(1), which criminalises the production of a modification or replacement part without proper approval. This exemption, however, provides a legal avenue to circumvent these penalties by offering an alternative means of compliance. Should manufacturers fail to comply with the conditions of the exemption—such as not adhering to the CASA approval—they risk falling back under the purview of subregulation 21.303(1), which could result in enforcement actions. The potential penalties for breaching these regulations are not explicitly stated in the provided text, but they generally encompass a range of civil and criminal sanctions, including fines and imprisonment, depending on the severity and intent of the breach.
Additionally, the exemption is a legislative instrument subject to the provisions of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (LIA). Under section 11.215 of CASR 1998, the exemption is declared to be a disallowable instrument, meaning it must be tabled and can be subject to disallowance by Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the LIA. This adds an additional layer of scrutiny and accountability to the exemption process. Despite the exemption's intended benefit to manufacturers by providing an alternative compliance pathway, no consultation under section 17 of the LIA was undertaken in this instance. The exemption is specifically designed to facilitate compliance with safety standards while offering flexibility in production processes. The exemption is set to commence on 1 November 2010 and will cease to have effect at the end of October 2011, providing a temporary framework within which manufacturers can operate.