CASA EX81/12 - Exemption — from standard take-off and landing minima – United and Continental Airlines

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2012L01126 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Explanatory Statement

Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998

Exemption — from standard take-off and landing minima  United and Continental Airlines

 

Section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) empowers the Governor-General to make regulations for the Act and the safety of air navigation.

 

Legislation

Under subregulation 257 (1) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988), CASA may determine the meteorological minima, that is the visibility requirements, for landing or take-off at an aerodrome. Under subregulation 257 (2), the determination must be published in AIP or NOTAMS. Under subregulations 257 (3) and (4), it is an offence for an aircraft to takeoff or land if an element of the meteorological minima for that operation is less than that determined for the aircraft at the aerodrome.

 

The determination of standard meteorological minima for take-off and landing was made in instrument CASA 70/11. The minima are also set out in AIP En Route 1.5, sections 4.3, 4.4 and 4.7. If conditions are met, the minimum visibility for take-off inside or outside Australian territory is 550 metres. If conditions are met, the minimum visibility for landing inside or outside Australian territory is 800 metres, or 550 metres RVR. An exemption would be required to operate with lower minimum visibility (low visibility operations or LVO).

 

Subsection 98 (5A) of the Act provides that the Regulations may empower CASA to issue instruments in relation to the following:

(a) matters affecting the safe navigation and operation, or the maintenance, of aircraft; or

(b) the airworthiness of, or design standards for, aircraft.

Subregulation 11.160 (1) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) provides that, for subsection 98 (5A) of the Act, CASA may grant an exemption from a provision of the regulations, including CAR 1988, or a provision of the Civil Aviation Orders (the CAOs), in relation to a matter mentioned in that subsection. Under subregulation 11.160 (2), an exemption may be granted to a person, or to a class of persons, and may specify the class by reference to membership of a specified body or any other characteristic.

 

Under subregulation 11.205 (1) of CASR 1998, CASA may impose conditions on an exemption if this is necessary in the interests of the safety of air navigation. Under regulation 11.225 of CASR 1998, an exemption must be published on the Internet. Under subregulation 11.230 (1), an exemption ceases on the day specified within it (but no longer than 3 years after its commencement) or, if no day is specified, 3 years after commencement.

 

Instrument

The exemption has been issued for United Air Lines, Inc. and Continental Airlines, Inc. for the conduct of LVO in Australia. Following the approval of Melbourne airport for Category II and Category III operations, which enables operations to be conducted to lower minima than was previously permitted under those exemptions, a review of the rules governing low visibility operations was conducted. The exemption states the minima for the various aeroplanes, as well as the conditions for their use. For instance, the use of the lower minima will require a higher standard of runway lighting (see clause 8 in Schedule 2).

 

In essence, the operator must ensure that specified visibility standards are met for takeoffs and landings. These may be performed only at aerodromes properly equipped to support the LVO conducted under the exemption. The operator must also conduct its operations in accordance with the approval to conduct LVO issued by the Federal Aviation Authority of the United States of America (FAA).

 

This instrument is the same in substance as CASA EX41/10, which stops having effect at the end of 31 May 2012, except that the exemption also applies to Continental Airlines, Inc. and to Boeing 737700 and Boeing 737800 aircraft. These changes reflect the operational merger and proposed legal merger of United Air Lines, Inc. and Continental Airlines, Inc. and the Operations Specifications issued by the FAA.

 

Legislative Instruments Act

For subsection 98 (5A) of the Act, CASA may, by instrument, grant an exemption from compliance with a provision of the regulations or the CAOs. An instrument issued under paragraph 98 (5A) (a) of the Act is a legislative instrument if the instrument is expressed to apply to a class of persons or aircraft. The exemption applies to a class of aircraft. The exemption is, therefore, a legislative instrument and is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the Legislative Instrument Act 2003 (the LIA).

 

Compatibility with human rights and freedoms

This instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011 as it does not raise any human rights issues. It does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.

 

Consultation

United Air Lines, Inc. has requested this instrument. Further consultation under section 17 of the LIA has not been undertaken in this case. The instrument is required by United Air Lines, Inc. and Continental Airlines, Inc. to enable low visibility takeoffs and CAT II and CAT III landings inside Australia consistent with the standards and requirements specified in the instrument which are not considered prejudicial to the interests of safety.

 

Office of Best Practice Regulation (OBPR)

The exemption would be of beneficial effect to the operator. OBPR does not require preparation of a Regulation Impact Statement in this case because a preliminary assessment of business compliance costs in the context of the nature of the instrument indicates that it will have only a nil to low impact on business.

 

Making and commencement

The exemption has been made by a delegate of CASA under regulation 11.260 of CASR 1998.

 

The instrument commences on 1 June 2012 and stops having effect at the end of 31 May 2015.

 

[Instrument number CASA EX81/12]

Overview

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, as amended by the instrument CASA EX81/12, were enacted to address the need for exemptions from standard take-off and landing minima for specific airlines operating in Australia. This regulation was introduced to facilitate low visibility operations (LVO) by United Air Lines, Inc. and Continental Airlines, Inc., allowing them to conduct such operations at Melbourne airport in accordance with the standards set by the Federal Aviation Authority of the United States of America (FAA). The Civil Aviation Act 1988 empowers the Governor-General to make regulations concerning the safety of air navigation, and the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 provide the framework for implementing these safety measures. The instrument is a legislative instrument subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament, as per the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. The exemption is compatible with human rights and does not require a Regulation Impact Statement due to its minimal impact on business compliance costs. This instrument aims to enhance safety while accommodating the specific operational needs of the airlines involved.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, as amended by F2012L01126, pertain to United Air Lines, Inc. and Continental Airlines, Inc., granting exemptions from standard take-off and landing minima for conducting low visibility operations within Australian territory. This exemption applies to specific aircraft types and mandates adherence to particular conditions to ensure safety during low visibility take-offs and landings, such as compliance with higher standards for runway lighting. The exemption is issued under the authority granted by section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, allowing the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue instruments concerning the safe navigation and operation of aircraft. This particular exemption was necessitated by the operational merger of United Air Lines, Inc. and Continental Airlines, Inc., and the approval of Melbourne airport for Category II and III operations, which permit lower visibility minima than previously allowed. The exemption applies specifically to the entities named and their aircraft, and it must be exercised within the parameters set by CASA, ensuring that the operations do not compromise safety standards. The exemption is a legislative instrument under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament. It is compatible with human rights and freedoms as it does not raise any human rights issues. The exemption was made in response to a request by United Air Lines, Inc. and was deemed to have a nil to low impact on business compliance costs, thus not requiring a Regulation Impact Statement from the Office of Best Practice Regulation. The exemption commences on 1 June 2012 and ceases on 31 May 2015.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) permit the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to grant exemptions from certain regulatory provisions to ensure the safe navigation and operation of aircraft (section 11.160(1)). This is applicable to matters affecting the safe navigation and operation, or the airworthiness of, or design standards for, aircraft (section 98(5A) of the Civil Aviation Act 1988). Subregulation 11.160(1) of CASR 1998 outlines that CASA may grant such exemptions, which may apply to specific persons or classes of persons, and these exemptions can be published on the internet (subregulation 11.205(1)). The exemption must specify the conditions under which it applies and must cease no later than three years from its commencement unless a specific end date is stated (subregulation 11.230(1)). For the purpose of low visibility operations (LVO), CASA has issued an exemption for United Air Lines, Inc. and Continental Airlines, Inc., allowing them to conduct LVO in Australia under certain conditions (CASA EX81/12). The exemption requires operators to adhere to specified visibility standards for take-offs and landings, which can be performed only at aerodromes equipped to support LVO. The exemption also mandates that operations must be conducted in accordance with the approval issued by the Federal Aviation Authority of the United States of America (FAA). This includes adherence to the operational standards and specifications set forth in the FAA's Operations Specifications. Furthermore, the exemption applies to specific aircraft models and requires higher standards of runway lighting for lower visibility operations (see clause 8 in Schedule 2). Any breach of the conditions outlined in the exemption may lead to civil or criminal consequences. Under subregulations 257(3) and 257(4) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 (CAR 1998), it is an offence for an aircraft to take-off or land if the meteorological conditions fall below the determined minima. This could result in enforcement actions by CASA or other regulatory bodies. The exemption itself is a legislative instrument and is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (LIA). It is also compatible with human rights and freedoms as it does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms. The exemption was made by a delegate of CASA under regulation 11.260 of CASR 1998 and comes into effect on 1 June 2012, ceasing to have effect at the end of 31 May 2015. The instrument is required by United Air Lines, Inc. and Continental Airlines, Inc. to enable low visibility take-offs and CAT II and CAT III landings inside Australia, consistent with the standards and requirements specified in the instrument, which are not considered prejudicial to the interests of safety. This exemption, being of beneficial effect to the operators, does not require a Regulation Impact Statement as it is anticipated to have a nil to low impact on business.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Aviation Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Exemptions & Exclusions
Compliance Obligations
Catchwords
Exemption
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.