CASA EX80/14 - Repeal of CASA EX117/13 – exemption from standard take-off minima – Jetstar Airways

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2014L01068 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Explanatory Statement

Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998

Repeal of CASA EX117/13 – exemption from standard take-off minima –Jetstar Airways

 

Legislation

The determination of standard meteorological minima for take-off and landing was made in instrument CASA 70/11. The minima are also set out in AIP En Route 1.5, section 4. If conditions are met, the minimum visibility for take-off inside or outside Australian territory is 550 metres. An exemption would be required to operate with lower minimum visibility (lowvisibility operations or LVO).

 

Subregulation 11.160 (1) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) provides that, for subsection 98 (5A) of the Act, CASA may grant an exemption from a provision of the regulations, including the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988, in relation to a matter mentioned in that subsection. Under subregulation 11.160 (2), an exemption may be granted to a person, or to a class of persons, and may specify the class by reference to membership of a specified body or any other characteristic.

 

Under subsection 33 (3) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, where an Act confers a power to make, grant or issue any instrument of a legislative or administrative character (including rules, regulations or by-laws), the power shall be construed as including a power exercisable in the like manner and subject to the like conditions (if any) to repeal, rescind, revoke, amend, or vary any such instrument.

 

Repealed exemption CASA EX117/13

The repealed exemption exempted B787-8 aeroplanes operated by Jetstar Airways Pty Limited (the operator) from compliance with the standard meteorological minima for take-off set out in instrument CASA 70/11.

 

CASA EX117/13 is no longer required as a new instrument, which is not legislative, has been issued in its place. Instruments of this sort are no longer considered legislative in nature because they do not apply to a class of aeroplanes or persons but to the aeroplanes operated by a single operator.

 

Consultation

Consultation has not been undertaken under section 17 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. The operator had applied for a reissue of the exemption. The new instrument will expand the scope of the exemption, by allowing reduced minima for take-offs and also allowing reduced visibility Category II landings. Following assessment of the operator’s flight crew training, procedures and equipment, CASA considers that the expansion is appropriate.

 

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights is at Attachment 1.

 

Office of Best Practice Regulation (OBPR)

A Regulation Impact Statement (RIS) is not required because the exemption is covered by a standing agreement between CASA and OBPR under which a RIS is not required for exemptions (OBPR id: 14507).

 

Making and commencement

The exemption has been made by the Director of Aviation Safety, on behalf of CASA, under subsection 73 (2) of the Act.

 

The instrument commences on the day of registration. It expires on the day after registration, as if it had been repealed by another instrument.

[Instrument number CASA EX80/14]

Attachment 1

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011

 

Repeal of CASA EX117/13 – exemption from standard take-off minima 
Jetstar Airways

 

This legislative instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

 

Overview of the legislative instrument

The legislative instrument repeals an instrument of exemption. The primary purpose of the repeal instrument was to allow aircraft to take-off using reduced visibility minima specified in the exemption.

 

The instrument of exemption has been replaced by another instrument which is not legislative in nature.

 

Human rights implications

This legislative instrument does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.

 

Conclusion

This legislative instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues.

Civil Aviation Safety Authority

Overview

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) were enacted to regulate and ensure the safety of civil aviation within Australia. These regulations are designed to provide a comprehensive framework that addresses various safety aspects, including the setting of standard meteorological minima for take-off and landing. The problem or gap addressed by this piece of legislation is the need for specific exemptions to allow certain operations under conditions that would otherwise be prohibited by the standard minima. The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), which is the body responsible for enforcing and administering the CASR 1998, was the enacting authority in this instance. The policy objective behind this repeal and replacement of an exemption is to ensure that the operations of Jetstar Airways can proceed safely under reduced visibility conditions, as assessed and approved by CASA based on the operator's compliance with relevant training, procedures, and equipment standards.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) apply to aviation activities within Australian territory and its airspace, governing various aspects of civil aviation operations, including safety standards, licensing, and exemptions. Specifically, the repealed exemption CASA EX117/13, which allowed Jetstar Airways Pty Limited to operate B787-8 aeroplanes under reduced meteorological minima for take-off, has been replaced by a non-legislative instrument. The repealed exemption, which was initially in place to allow Jetstar Airways to comply with lower take-off minima, has been revoked as the operator has applied for a reissue of the exemption under a new instrument. This new instrument not only covers reduced take-off minima but also reduced visibility Category II landings, reflecting an expansion in scope deemed appropriate by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) following an assessment of the operator’s flight crew training, procedures, and equipment. The new instrument is not considered legislative in nature as it pertains to a specific operator rather than a class of aeroplanes or persons. The repeal and replacement of CASA EX117/13 demonstrate CASA's regulatory approach to ensuring aviation safety while accommodating specific operational needs, subject to rigorous assessment and compliance with civil aviation standards.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) include provisions that govern the determination of standard meteorological minima for take-off and landing, as outlined in instrument CASA 70/11 and AIP En Route 1.5, section 4 (subsection 11.160(1)). These minima, which can be as low as 550 metres for visibility, require an exemption for lower minimum visibility operations (subsection 11.160(2)). Subregulation 11.160(1) permits the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to grant exemptions from regulation provisions, including the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988, where specified conditions are met. The Act imposes certain obligations and requirements on Jetstar Airways, as well as on CASA, regarding the exemption from standard take-off minima. CASA must assess the operator's flight crew training, procedures, and equipment before granting or expanding an exemption. The operator must ensure that their operations comply with any granted exemptions and maintain appropriate safety standards. CASA’s assessment and approval process ensures that the exemptions are granted only when safety is not compromised. There are no specific offences, penalties, or consequences mentioned in the repealed exemption CASA EX117/13 or in the new instrument CASA EX80/14. However, failure to comply with the conditions of an exemption or to meet the safety standards set by CASA can lead to regulatory action, including potential revocation of the exemption or other enforcement measures. The repealed exemption CASA EX117/13 is no longer required because a new non-legislative instrument has been issued, reflecting the specific operations of Jetstar Airways rather than a broader class of aircraft or operators. The new instrument CASA EX80/14 expands the scope of the exemption to include not only reduced take-off minima but also reduced visibility Category II landings. This expanded scope was deemed appropriate by CASA following a review of Jetstar Airways' flight crew training, procedures, and equipment. The instrument is made under subsection 73(2) of the Act and commences on the day of registration, expiring the day after registration as if repealed by another instrument. Additionally, a Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights confirms the compatibility of this legislative instrument with human rights, as it does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Aviation Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Repeal & Amendment
Offence Provisions
Exemptions & Exclusions

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.