Explanatory Statement
Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998
Exemption and directions — Design of temporary modifications or repairs for an aircraft that is to be operated under a special flight permit
Purpose
The exemption allows an authorised person, or approved design organisation (ADO), to approve the design of a modification or repair of an aircraft which does not fully comply with all the applicable airworthiness standards in circumstances where the aircraft is to be operated under a special flight permit.
Legislation
Section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) empowers the Governor-General to make regulations for the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation. Relevantly, the Governor-General has made the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR) and Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR).
Regulation 21.009 of CASR prescribes the approval of technical data for an aircraft, aircraft engine, propeller or appliance submitted to an authorised person or ADO where the technical data is submitted in connection with an application for a modification or repair design approval.
Subregulation 21.009 (2) requires an authorised person or an ADO to approve the technical data for a modification or repair design approval if they are satisfied that the technical data demonstrates that the design complies with the applicable airworthiness standards for the instrument.
Regulation 21.436 of CASR contemplates circumstances in which an application for a modification or repair does not comply with applicable airworthiness standards and obliges an authorised person or an ADO assessing the application to follow specified procedures about whether the non-compliance is compensated for by factors that provide an equivalent level of safety.
Regulation 21.437 of CASR further prescribes matters relating to a grant of a modification or repair design approval by an authorised person or an ADO. Under subregulation 21.437 (2), an authorised person or an ADO must approve an application for a modification or repair design if, among other matters, the design complies with the applicable airworthiness standards for the design.
Subregulation 21.197 (1) of CASR provides that a special flight permit may be issued for an aircraft that may not currently meet the applicable airworthiness requirements, but could reasonably be expected to be capable of safe flight for certain intended purposes further prescribed in that subregulation.
Subpart 11.F of CASR provides for the granting of exemptions from particular provisions of the regulations. Subregulation 11.160 (1) of CASR provides that, for subsection 98 (5A) of the Act, CASA may grant an exemption from a provision of the regulations.
Under subregulation 11.160 (2), an exemption may be granted to a person or a class of persons.
Under subregulation 11.170 (3), in deciding whether to grant an exemption, CASA must regard as paramount the preservation of an acceptable level of safety.
Regulation 11.205 provides that CASA may impose conditions on an exemption if necessary in the interests of the safety of air navigation. Under regulation 11.210, it is a strict liability offence not to comply with the obligations imposed by a condition.
Regulation 11.225 of CASR requires an exemption to be published on the Internet. Under subregulation 11.230 (1), the maximum duration of an exemption is 3 years.
Subpart 11.G of CASR provides for CASA to issue directions in relation to matters affecting the safety of air navigation. Under paragraph 11.245 (1) (c) of CASR, CASA may, by instrument, issue a direction about any matter affecting the airworthiness of, or design standards for, aircraft. Subregulation 11.245 (2) of CASR provides that CASA may issue such a direction if CASA is satisfied that it is necessary to do so in the interests of the safety of air navigation, if the direction is not inconsistent with the Act, and for the purposes of CASA’s functions.
Under paragraph 11.250 (a) of CASR, a direction under regulation 11.245 ceases to be in force on the day specified in the direction. Under regulation 11.255, it is an offence of strict liability to contravene a direction under regulation 11.245.
Background
Operators sometimes require approval of temporary modifications/repair designs that do not meet applicable airworthiness standards to allow an aircraft to fly under the special flight permit provisions in regulation 21.197 of CASR. Special flight permits may only be issued for the limited purposes prescribed under that regulation. These purposes include: flying the aircraft to a base where repairs are to be performed, delivering or exporting the aircraft, and dealing with emergencies.
In these situations, authorised persons and ADOs are asked to consider applications to approve the temporary modifications and repairs that do not comply with the applicable airworthiness standards.
CASA recognises that it is often not possible or practicable for an operator to demonstrate strict compliance with all applicable airworthiness standards in the case of temporary modifications or repairs associated with operations under a special flight permit.
Accordingly, CASA has previously exempted relevant persons from complying with the requirements in Subpart 21.M for designs for temporary modifications/repairs to comply with applicable airworthiness standards, with the most recent instrument, CASA EX99/16, expiring on 30 June 2017.
Instrument
The exemption allows an authorised person or ADO to approve the design of a modification or repair which does not fully comply with all the applicable airworthiness standards where the aircraft is to be operated under a special flight permit associated with that design and where an equivalent level of safety is not achieved.
It is a condition that an authorised person or ADO must take into account any relevant consideration relating to the safe operation of the intended flight, including all hazards and risks, before approving the design of temporary modifications or repairs.
Under section 4 of the instrument, CASA directs the approver to impose limitations, conditions and requirements that are necessary in relation to the approval to ensure the safety of air navigation. The approver must identify any specific person who is required to comply with a limitation, condition or requirement. A person who is so identified by the approver could be the applicant or another person who is required to do something in relation to the flight.
Further, section 4 includes a CASA direction for a person who is subject to a limitation, condition or requirement to comply with the limitation, condition or requirement.
The approver must set out any limitation, condition and requirement, and any person specified to comply with them, on the approval.
Failure to comply with the directions is a strict liability offence and may attract a penalty of up to 50 penalty units under regulation 11.255 of CASR.
CASA is currently in the process of preparing regulatory amendments that would prescribe the intent of this exemption within the regulations. It is anticipated that the regulatory reform process should be completed by June 2019. The instrument is expressed to be repealed at the end of 30 June 2020.
Legislation Act 2003 (the LA)
For subsection 98 (5A) of the Act, CASA may, by instrument, grant exemptions from compliance with a provision of the regulations and directions. Paragraph 98 (5AA) (a) of the Act provides that an instrument issued under paragraph 98 (5A) (a) is a legislative instrument if the instrument is expressed to apply to a class of persons.
This instrument applies to a class of persons, being authorised persons and ADOs. Accordingly, the instrument is a legislative instrument, and subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the LA.
Consultation
This instrument replaces instrument CASA EX99/16, which expired at the end of June 2017. The operation of the exemption provided under instrument CASA EX99/16 has been satisfactory, and there have been no changes to the effect of the exemption provided under this instrument, which is beneficial to industry.
In these circumstances, it is CASA’s view that it is not necessary or appropriate to undertake any further consultation under section 17 of the LA.
Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights
A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights is at Attachment 1.
Office of Best Practice Regulation (OBPR)
A Regulation Impact Statement (RIS) is not required for this instrument, as the exemption is covered by a standing agreement between CASA and OBPR under which a RIS is not required for exemptions (OBPR id: 14507).
Making and commencement
The exemption has been issued by a delegate of CASA relying on the power of delegation under subregulation 11.260 (1) of CASR.
The instrument commences on the day of registration, and is repealed at the end of 30 June 2020.
[Instrument number CASA EX76/17]
Attachment 1
Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights
Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011
Exemption — Design of temporary modifications or repairs for an aircraft
that is to be operated under a special flight permit
This legislative instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised
or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.
Overview of the legislative instrument
The exemption allows an authorised person, or approved design organisation (ADO), to approve the design of a modification or repair of an aircraft which does not fully comply with all the applicable airworthiness standards in circumstances where the aircraft is operating under a special flight permit.
A condition and directions on the instrument ensure that an authorised person, or ADO, takes into account any relevant consideration relating to the safe operation of the intended flight before approving the design of temporary modifications or repairs, and that appropriate safety limitations and conditions are placed on an approval and complied with.
Human rights implications
This legislative instrument does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.
Conclusion
This legislative instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues.
Civil Aviation Safety Authority