CASA EX74/15 - Exemption—carriage of passengers on training flight

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2015L00608 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Explanatory Statement

Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998

Exemption — carriage of passengers on training flight

 

Section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) empowers the Governor-General to make regulations for the Act and the safety of air navigation.

 

Subregulation 249 (1) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988) provides that the pilot in command of an aircraft that carries a passenger must not engage in certain specified types of flying. In particular, paragraph 249 (1) (b) provides that the pilot in command must not engage in practice of emergency procedures in the aircraft, and paragraph 249 (1) (c) provides that he or she must not engage in low-flying practice.

 

Subregulation 11.160 (1) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) provides that, for subsection 98 (5A) of the Act, CASA may grant an exemption from a provision of the regulations or a Civil Aviation Order in relation to a matter mentioned in that subsection. Under subregulation 11.160 (2), an exemption may be granted to a person, or to a class of persons, and may specify the class by reference to membership of a specified body or any other characteristic.

 

Under subregulation 11.205 (1) of CASR 1998, CASA may impose conditions on an exemption if this is necessary in the interests of the safety of air navigation. Under regulation 11.225 of CASR 1998, an exemption must be published on the Internet. Under subregulation 11.230 (1), an exemption ceases on the day specified within it (but no longer than 3 years after its commencement) or, if no day is specified, 3 years after commencement.

 

Under subsection 33 (3) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, where an Act confers a power to make, grant or issue any instrument of a legislative or administrative character (including rules, regulations or by-laws), the power shall be construed as including a power exercisable in the like manner and subject to the like conditions (if any) to repeal, rescind, revoke, amend, or vary any such instrument.

 

Background

Following completion of a course of training, applicants for issue of a flight examiner rating or for approval as a check pilot in a training and checking organisation are assessed by CASA. The course of training may include training with an industry mentor or a training and checking captain. The training usually includes flights where the applicant observes the conduct of a flight test or proficiency check in which the control seats are occupied by the mentor or training and checking captain and another pilot undergoing a check or a flight test. These checks may include simulated emergency procedures or low-flying practice.

 

This practice is of great benefit to the observer. He or she is enabled to observe the techniques employed by an experienced flight examiner, or training and checking captain. However, the observer is a passenger for the purposes of regulation 2 of CAR 1988, which defines passenger as “any person who is on board an aircraft other than a member of the operating crew.” Being a passenger, the pilot in command would be in breach of subregulation 249 (1) of CAR 1988. An exemption is, therefore, required to allow this practice to take place.

Instrument

CASA EX74/15 is an instrument that repeals and replaces an exemption (CASA EX70/12) that was granted for the purpose of allowing flight examiner applicants to sit as observers on certain flights prohibited by subregulation 249 (1) of CAR 1988. CASA EX70/12 expired at the end of April 2015.

 

CASA EX74/15 exempts a pilot in command of an aeroplane, helicopter, gyroplane or airship from compliance with subregulation 249 (1) of CAR 1988. The exemption only extends to the carriage of a passenger while the pilot in command is undertaking a proficiency check or flight test on another pilot. The exemption is subject to a range of conditions, including that the passenger must be an applicant for a check pilot approval or flight examiner rating, or is otherwise a CASA officer who is undergoing training in connection with his or her employment to become a flight examiner or inspector. The pilot in command must ensure that the passenger does not interfere with the conduct of the proficiency check or flight test. The passenger must not occupy a control seat.

 

Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (the LIA)

For subsection 98 (5A) of the Act, CASA may, by instrument, grant an exemption from compliance with a provision of the regulations or Civil Aviation Orders. An instrument issued under paragraph 98 (5A) (a) of the Act is a legislative instrument if the instrument is expressed to apply to a class of persons or aircraft. The instrument applies to a class of persons undergoing training and is, therefore, legislative. As a legislative instrument, it is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the LIA.

 

Consultation

At the request of industry, CASA EX74/15 continues CASA’s exemption for flight examiner applicants to observe flight examinations as passengers (CASA EX70/12 refers). The exemption is beneficial to industry since flight examiner and check pilot applicants can learn from qualified flight examiners or training and checking captains on the conduct of flight tests and proficiency checks. It is CASA’s view that it is not necessary or appropriate to conduct any further consultation under section 17 of the LIA.

 

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights is at Attachment 1.

 

Office of Best Practice Regulation (OBPR)

A Regulation Impact Statement (RIS) is not required because the instrument is covered by a standing agreement between CASA and OBPR under which a RIS is not required (OBPR id: 14507).

 

Making and commencement

The instrument has been made by a delegate of CASA relying on the power of delegation under subregulation 11.260 (1) of CASR 1998.

 

The exemption commences on 1 May 2015 and expires at the end of April 2018, as if it had been repealed by another instrument.

[Instrument number CASA EX74/15]

Attachment 1

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011

Exemption — carriage of passengers on training flight

This legislative instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the legislative instrument

The purpose of the legislative instrument is to allow applicants for a flight examiner rating to observe, as a passenger, the conduct of a flight test or check where the aircraft control seats are occupied by a student pilot and a flight examiner or training and checking captain. The carriage of passengers during a training flight that simulates emergency procedures would be in contravention of subregulation 249 (1) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998.

 

The instrument provides an exemption from that requirement and is subject to a range of conditions that CASA has imposed in the interests of aviation safety.

 

Human rights implications

This legislative instrument does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.

 

Conclusion

This legislative instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues.

Civil Aviation Safety Authority

Overview

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, amended by the legislative instrument CASA EX74/15, address the need for a regulatory exemption to allow flight examiner applicants to observe flight tests and proficiency checks as passengers. This was necessary because such practice would otherwise contravene subregulation 249(1) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998, which prohibits pilots from carrying passengers during emergency procedure practice and low-flying practice. The exemption is granted by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, empowering CASA to make regulations for aviation safety. The exemption is subject to specific conditions aimed at ensuring aviation safety, such as limiting the passenger to an applicant for a flight examiner rating or a CASA officer undergoing training, and prohibiting the passenger from occupying a control seat. This legislative instrument, which commenced on 1 May 2015, is compatible with human rights as it does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 Exemption Instrument CASA EX74/15 pertains to the carriage of passengers on training flights, specifically allowing flight examiner applicants to observe flight examinations as passengers. The exemption applies to pilots in command of aeroplanes, helicopters, gyroplanes, and airships, and it exempts them from the compliance requirements of subregulation 249(1) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 while they are conducting a proficiency check or flight test on another pilot. The exemption is limited to passengers who are applicants for a check pilot approval or flight examiner rating, or CASA officers undergoing training for employment as flight examiners or inspectors. Importantly, the passenger must not interfere with the proficiency check or flight test and must not occupy a control seat. The instrument is subject to conditions set by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to ensure aviation safety. This exemption is legislative, given it applies to a class of persons undergoing training, and it is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. The exemption commenced on 1 May 2015 and expires at the end of April 2018, effectively being repealed by another instrument.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) under Section 11.160(1) allow the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to grant exemptions from certain provisions of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 or Civil Aviation Orders. This specific exemption, CASA EX74/15, pertains to the carriage of passengers during training flights for flight examiner applicants, which would otherwise be prohibited under subregulation 249(1) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 (CAR 1998). The exemption is designed to facilitate the training of applicants for flight examiner ratings or check pilot approvals by allowing them to observe flight tests and proficiency checks as passengers. This is subject to several conditions aimed at ensuring safety, such as the passenger not interfering with the flight test or proficiency check, not occupying a control seat, and being a flight examiner applicant or a CASA officer undergoing training. The parties governed by CASA EX74/15, primarily pilots in command of aeroplanes, helicopters, gyroplanes, or airships, and the passengers, must adhere to stringent conditions to benefit from the exemption. The pilot in command must ensure that the passenger does not interfere with the conduct of the proficiency check or flight test. The passenger must be an applicant for a check pilot approval or flight examiner rating, or a CASA officer undergoing training for employment as a flight examiner or inspector. This ensures that the exemption is used for its intended educational purposes and does not compromise aviation safety. Breach of the conditions outlined in CASA EX74/15 could result in serious safety implications and potential legal consequences. While the specific penalties for non-compliance are not detailed in the provided text, general provisions under the Civil Aviation Act 1988 and the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 could include fines, imprisonment, or other civil and criminal penalties. The safety of air navigation is paramount, and any deviation from the conditions of the exemption could lead to severe repercussions, including revocation of flight examiner or check pilot approvals and potential legal action against the pilot in command or the training organisation.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Administrative Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Delegated & Subordinate Legislation
Exemptions & Exclusions
Compliance Obligations
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.