Explanatory Statement
Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998
Exemption — Virgin Australia International Airlines from subregulation 217 (2) of CAR 1988 and paragraph 3.3 of Civil Aviation Order 82.5 (cabin crew training)
Legislation
Section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) empowers the Governor-General to make regulations for the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation.
Under section 27 of the Act, CASA may issue Air Operator’s Certificates (AOCs) with respect to aircraft for the purpose of safety regulation. Under section 28 of the Act, CASA must issue an AOC if satisfied that the applicant can comply with the requirements of Australian civil aviation safety legislation.
Under paragraph 28BA (1) (b) of the Act, an AOC has effect subject to any conditions specified in the regulations or Civil Aviation Orders (the CAOs).
Subregulation 11.160 (1) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) provides that, for subsection 98 (5A), CASA may grant an exemption from a provision of the Regulations, including the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988) or a provision of the CAOs, in relation to a matter mentioned in that subsection. Under subregulation 11.160 (2), an exemption may be granted to a person, or to a class of persons, and may specify the class by reference to membership of a specified body or any other characteristic.
Under subregulation 11.205 (1) of CASR 1998, CASA may impose conditions on an exemption if this is necessary in the interests of the safety of air navigation. Under regulation 11.225 of CASR 1998, an exemption must be published on the Internet. Under subregulation 11.230 (1), an exemption ceases on the day specified within it (but no longer than 3 years after its commencement) or, if no day is specified, 3 years after commencement.
Details of exemption
Regulation 217 of CAR 1988 provides that an operator of a regular public transport (RPT) service must provide a training and checking organisation to ensure that its operating crews maintain their competency. Under subregulation 217 (2), the operator must ensure that the organisation provides for the making in each calendar year, at intervals of not less than 4 months, of 2 proficiency checks to test the competency of the members of the operating crews.
Part 82 of the CAOs specifies conditions on AOCs for various kinds of operations. CAO 82.5 contains conditions on AOCs that authorise RPT operations in high capacity aircraft. A high capacity aircraft is defined in paragraph 2.1 of CAO 82.0 as an aircraft certificated as having a maximum seating capacity exceeding 38 seats or a maximum payload exceeding 4 200 kilograms.
Paragraph 3.3 of CAO 82.5 provides that each operator must ensure that a person does not act as an operating crew member on a scheduled revenue service unless that person has satisfactorily completed all necessary training programs and proficiency checks and has been certified by a check pilot as competent to act as an operating crew member.
Paragraph 3.3 applies to Virgin Australia Airlines Pty Ltd (VAA) and Virgin Australia International Airlines Pty Ltd (VAIA).
VAA, the Virgin Australia Holdings’ domestic carrier, serviced Denpasar through an arrangement with VAIA. An Indonesian presidential decree was issued requiring the operator and the marketing carrier to be the same entity. As a result, this arrangement could not continue beyond mid-December 2012.
CASA EX186/12 was issued to allow Boeing 737 operating crews trained and checked by VAA to operate between Australia and Denpasar on flights conducted by VAIA. It also allowed the VAA training and checking organisation to continue to supervise training and checking of the B737 operating crews now employed by VAIA and to carry out proficiency checks under subregulation 217 (2) of CAR 1988 on the B737 NG operating crews. The obligation placed on VAIA to comply with paragraph 3.3 was also given to VAA to discharge in respect of its former crews.
This exemption is an extension of exemption CASA EX186/12 which expired at the end of June 2013. It applies to cabin crew.
It was intended that, by the end of 30 June 2013, VAIA would assume responsibility for the functions the subject of the exemption. VAA and VAIA then requested that the exemption be modified and extended to allow the present arrangements for training and checking B737 flight crew and cabin crew to continue until a joint organisational structure is established in preparation for the commencement of new Parts 119 and 142 of CASR 1998. These Parts will set out new requirements for the certification and management of Australian air transport operators (Part 119) and complex flight training and contracted recurrent training and checking of pilots (Part 142).
The exemption has been extended as requested with separate exemptions for flight crew and cabin crew.
The flight crew exemption will be in force until the end of 30 June 2014. The cabin crew exemption will be in force until the end of 30 June 2015 or the commencement of Part 119, whichever happens first. The cabin crew exemption will not be required after the commencement of Part 119 because that Part does not deal with cabin crew.
Legislative Instruments Act
Subsection 98 (5A) of the Act gives CASA the power to grant an exemption from compliance with a provision of the Regulations or the CAOs. Under subsection 98 (5AA) of the Act, an instrument issued under paragraph 98 (5A) (a) of the Act is a legislative instrument if the instrument is expressed to apply to a class of persons or aircraft. This instrument applies to a class of aircraft and persons and is, therefore, legislative. As a legislative instrument, it is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (the LIA).
Consultation
Consultation for section 17 of the LIA has been undertaken with the Virgin Group of Airlines in relation to the preparation of this exemption and the related exemption for flight crew. As a result, the Virgin Group has submitted a statement of intent to CASA documenting its intention to transit to an implementation of Parts 119 and 142. In the meantime the 2 exemptions will allow VAA to continue its training, checking and induction of all B737 operating crew
Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights
A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights is at Attachment 1.
Commencement and making
The instrument commences on 1 July 2013. It stops having effect at the end of 30 June 2015, as if it had been repealed by another instrument, or the commencement of Part 119 of CASR 1998, whichever happens first.
The exemption has been made by a delegate of CASA relying on the power of delegation under subregulation 11.260 (1) of CASR 1998.
[Instrument number CASA EX69/13]
Attachment 1
Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights
Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011
Exemption — Virgin Australia International Airlines from subregulation 217 (2) of CAR 1988 and paragraph 3.3 of Civil Aviation Order 82.5 (cabin crew training)
This legislative instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.
Overview of the legislative instrument
The exemption allows the present arrangements for the training and checking of Virgin Australia International Airlines B737 cabin crew by Virgin Australia Airlines to be extended until a joint organisational structure is established in preparation for the commencement of Parts 119 and 142 of CASR 1998.
Human rights implications
This legislative instrument does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.
Conclusion
This legislative instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues.
Civil Aviation Safety Authority