Explanatory Statement
Civil Aviation Regulations 1988
Exemption — from standard take-off and landing minima – Jetstar
Legislation
Section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) empowers the Governor-General to make regulations for the Act and the safety of air navigation.
Under subregulation 257 (1) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988), CASA may determine the meteorological minima, that is the visibility requirements, for landing or take-off at an aerodrome. Under subregulation 257 (2), the determination must be published in AIP or NOTAMS. Under subregulation 257 (3), it is an offence for an aircraft to take off if an element of the meteorological minima for that operation is less than that determined for the aircraft at the aerodrome.
The determination of standard meteorological minima for take-off and landing was made in instrument CASA 237/10. The minima are also set out in AIP En Route 1.5, sections 4.3 and 4.4. If conditions are met, the minimum visibility for take-off inside or outside Australian territory is 550 metres. If conditions are met, the minimum visibility for landing inside or outside Australian territory is 800 metres, or 550 metres RVR. An exemption would be required to operate in lesser minimum visibility.
Under subregulation 308 (1) of CAR 1988, CASA may exempt aircraft, or persons in, on, or otherwise associated with the operation of, the aircraft, from compliance with specified provisions of CAR 1988. Under subregulation 308 (2), before making an exemption, CASA must take into account any relevant considerations relating to the interests of safety. Under subregulation 308 (3), CASA may make an exemption subject to any condition specified in the exemption as being necessary in the interests of safety. Under subregulation 308 (3A), it is an offence to contravene a condition of an exemption that is otherwise being relied upon for an operation.
CASA had issued an instrument (CASA EX46/10) exempting A320 and A321 aeroplanes operated by Jetstar Airways Pty Limited (Jetstar) from the standard meteorological minima for take‑off. This instrument revokes and replaces that exemption. There has been only 1 change made to the terms of the previous exemption. The need to use high intensity runway edge lighting (HIRL) as opposed to ordinary runway edge lighting, mentioned in Schedule 2, clause 13, applies only to runways with less than 350 metres runway visual range. This is in accordance with recognised aviation safety standards. Instrument CASA EX46/10 applied the need for HIRL to all runways.
The other conditions in Schedule 2 remain unchanged. The operator must ensure that specified visibility standards are met for take-offs and landings, which may be performed only at aerodromes properly equipped to support the low visibility operations conducted under the exemption. Flight crew training, experience, recency and competency must meet specified benchmarks. Aircraft equipment must be maintained. Operational restrictions and limitations must be observed. Appropriate foreign approvals for the operations must be obtained. A range of documents for inspection must be carried on board the aircraft.
Legislative Instruments Act
Under subparagraph 6 (d) (i) of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (the LIA), an instrument is a legislative instrument for section 5 of the LIA if it is declared to be a disallowable instrument under legislation in force before the commencement of the LIA. Under subregulation 308 (4) of CAR 1988, an exemption is a disallowable instrument. The exemption is, therefore, a legislative instrument and it is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the LIA.
Consultation
Consultation under section 17 of the LIA has not been undertaken in this case. The instrument is required by Jetstar to enable low visibility operations inside and outside Australian territory consistent with the standards and requirements specified in the instrument which are not considered prejudicial to the interests of safety. It replaces a previous instrument issued for the same purpose.
Office of Best Practice Regulation (OBPR)
The exemption would be of beneficial effect to the operator. The OBPR has not required preparation of a Regulation Impact Statement in the case of exemptions for the same purpose because a preliminary assessment of business compliance costs in the context of the nature of the instruments indicates that they will have only a nil to low impact on business.
Making and commencement
The exemption has been made by the Director of Aviation Safety, on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 73 (2) of the Act.
The instrument commences on the day after it is registered. It stops having effect at the end of 31 August 2012.
[Instrument number CASA EX69/10]
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988, amended by instrument CASA EX69/10, aim to exempt Jetstar Airways from standard take-off and landing minima, addressing the need for low visibility operations. Enacted under the authority of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, this legislation empowers the Governor-General to establish safety regulations for air navigation, with the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) determining the specific meteorological minima for landing and take-off at aerodromes. The primary objective of this exemption is to facilitate Jetstar's operations in conditions of lesser visibility than the standard minima, thereby enhancing operational flexibility and efficiency while ensuring compliance with stringent safety standards.
The exemption allows Jetstar to conduct take-offs and landings in reduced visibility, provided specific conditions are met, including adherence to visibility benchmarks, proper aircraft equipment maintenance, and compliance with operational restrictions. The instrument also mandates that Jetstar obtain necessary foreign approvals and carry required documents on board. This regulation, a legislative instrument under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament, although consultation under the Legislative Instruments Act was deemed unnecessary in this instance. The exemption, which replaces an earlier instrument, is effective until 31 August 2012 and is intended to benefit the operator without significantly impacting business compliance costs.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988) govern the safety of air navigation in Australia and are enforced by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA). Under Section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, CASA has the authority to make regulations that pertain to aviation safety, including setting meteorological minima for take-off and landing at aerodromes, which must be published in the Aeronautical Information Publication (AIP) or Notice to Air Missions (NOTAMS). Specifically, CASA 237/10 sets the standard minimum visibility for take-off at 550 metres and for landing at 800 metres or 550 metres RVR, if conditions are met, both inside and outside Australian territory. However, CASA can issue exemptions from these minima under subregulation 308(1) of CAR 1988, provided that any exemption is made in the interests of safety, taking into account relevant considerations. The instrument CASA EX69/10 exempts A320 and A321 aeroplanes operated by Jetstar Airways Pty Limited from the standard meteorological minima for take-off, with specific conditions to ensure safety, including the use of high intensity runway edge lighting on runways with less than 350 metres runway visual range, and mandates that operations must only occur at aerodromes equipped for low visibility operations. The exemption is a legislative instrument under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 and is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988) pertinent to this exemption pertain to the determination of meteorological minima for take-off and landing, as well as the process for granting exemptions from these minima. Under subregulation 257(1) of CAR 1988, the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) is empowered to determine the meteorological minima for landing or take-off at an aerodrome, which must then be published in the Aeronautical Information Publication (AIP) or Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) (subregulation 257(2)). Additionally, subregulation 257(3) stipulates that it is an offence for an aircraft to take off if any element of the meteorological minima for that operation is less than that determined for the aircraft at the aerodrome. Further, under subregulation 308(1) of CAR 1988, CASA may exempt aircraft, or persons in, on, or otherwise associated with the operation of, the aircraft, from compliance with specified provisions of CAR 1988, provided that any relevant considerations relating to the interests of safety are taken into account (subregulation 308(2)). Moreover, CASA may make an exemption subject to any condition specified in the exemption as being necessary in the interests of safety (subregulation 308(3)).
The obligations and requirements imposed on Jetstar Airways Pty Limited (Jetstar) by the exemption are multifaceted. Firstly, Jetstar must ensure that specified visibility standards are met for take-offs and landings, which may only be performed at aerodromes properly equipped to support low visibility operations conducted under the exemption. Additionally, flight crew training, experience, recency, and competency must meet specified benchmarks. Jetstar must also ensure that aircraft equipment is maintained, operational restrictions and limitations are observed, and appropriate foreign approvals for the operations are obtained. A range of documents must also be carried on board the aircraft for inspection. These requirements are intended to ensure that Jetstar's operations under the exemption do not compromise aviation safety.
There are several potential consequences for Jetstar if it breaches the terms of the exemption. Firstly, under subregulation 308(3A) of CAR 1988, it is an offence to contravene a condition of an exemption that is otherwise being relied upon for an operation. Such an offence is subject to a penalty of up to 500 penalty units, which equates to approximately AUD 55,000 at the time of writing. Furthermore, under section 91 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, any person who contravenes a regulation is liable to a penalty of up to 50 penalty units, which equates to approximately AUD 5,500 at the time of writing. Additionally, under section 92 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, any person who is convicted of an offence against the Act is liable to imprisonment for up to two years. These penalties and consequences serve to deter Jetstar from breaching the terms of the exemption and to ensure that it prioritises aviation safety in all its operations.