CASA EX66/10 – Exemption – operations without an approved digital flight data recorder

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2010L02348 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Explanatory Statement

Civil Aviation Regulations 1988

Exemption operations without an approved digital flight data recorder

 

Legislation

Section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) empowers the Governor-General to make regulations.

 

Subregulation 207 (2) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988) provides that an Australian aircraft must not be used in any class of operations unless it is fitted with such instruments and is fitted with or carries such equipment, including emergency equipment, as the Civil Aviation Safety Authority approves or directs.

 

Subregulation 5 (1) of CAR 1988 provides that whenever CASA is empowered by CAR 1988 to give directions or approvals, it may do so in Civil Aviation Orders (the CAOs).

 

Civil Aviation Order 20.18 (CAO 20.18) sets out instruments and equipment required for Australian aircraft engaged in certain classes of operations. Section 6 of CAO 20.18 requires installation of flight data recorders (FDRs) on certain types of aircraft.

 

Subregulation 21A (1) of CAR 1988 provides that CASA may issue a design standard for an aircraft component for which no appropriate design standard is in force.

 

Appendix 1 of Civil Aviation Order 103.19 (CAO 103.19) sets out the parameters, ranges, accuracy and recording intervals for FDRs.

 

National Jet Express Pty Ltd, trading as Cobham Aviation Services Australia – Regional Services (the operator), operates an aircraft which does not fully comply with CASA regulations because the aircraft had only to comply with United Kingdom regulations at the time of manufacture. At certain altitudes the FDR records at 2 second intervals. The FDR also only records the press to transmit from VHF No. 1 and does not record any squat weight on wheels discrete information. CASA has issued an exemption to enable the operator operate the aircraft while it looks for the required service bulletins and kits to modify the aircraft.

 

Legislative Instruments Act

Under regulation 5A of CAR 1988, if CASA has issued a direction in the form of a CAO and later issues another direction which has the effect of amending, varying or repealing the CAO, the later instrument is a disallowable instrument. The instrument affects the operation of paragraph 6.1 of CAO 20.18 and Appendix 1 of CAO 103.19.

 

Subregulation 308 (4) of CAR 1988 declares an exemption to be a disallowable instrument. Under subparagraph 6 (d) (i) of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (the LIA), an instrument is a legislative instrument for section 5 of the LIA if it is declared to be a disallowable instrument under legislation in force before the commencement of the LIA. As a legislative instrument, it is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the LIA.

 

Consultation

Consultation under section 17 of the LIA has been undertaken with the Australian Transport Bureau and they have agreed to the issue of the exemption. The instrument is for a particular operator and for a limited period to provide the operator additional time to rectify an identified problem.

 

The instrument commences on the day after it is registered and stops having effect at the end of 30 August 2011.

 

The instrument has been issued by the Director of Aviation Safety in accordance with subsection 73 (2) of the Act.

 

[Instrument number CASA EX66/10]

Overview

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988, as amended by F2010L02348, was enacted to address the specific needs of operators such as National Jet Express Pty Ltd, trading as Cobham Aviation Services Australia – Regional Services, who operate aircraft that do not fully comply with current Australian regulations. The primary concern was the aircraft's non-compliance with Australian standards, particularly regarding the flight data recorders (FDRs) that were only required to meet United Kingdom regulations at the time of manufacture. This legislation was introduced to provide a temporary exemption to ensure the aircraft could continue to operate while the necessary modifications are being sought. The instrument was issued under the authority of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, with the policy objective of facilitating compliance while allowing the operator to address the non-conformance issues. The exemption is subject to disallowance by the Parliament, reflecting the legislative intent to balance operational needs with safety standards.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988) and associated Civil Aviation Orders (CAOs) govern the mandatory requirements for aircraft instruments and equipment, including digital flight data recorders (FDRs), in Australia. Specifically, Subregulation 207(2) of CAR 1988 mandates that Australian aircraft must be equipped with approved instruments and equipment, including emergency equipment, for certain classes of operations. The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) issues specific requirements for FDRs in CAO 20.18, which applies to certain types of aircraft. This regulatory framework applies to all Australian aircraft and operators within the Commonwealth of Australia. However, the regulations acknowledge the possibility of exemptions to allow operators to rectify non-compliance issues temporarily, as seen in the case of National Jet Express Pty Ltd, trading as Cobham Aviation Services Australia – Regional Services, which received an exemption to operate a non-compliant aircraft while seeking modifications. The exemption, issued under the authority of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 and subject to parliamentary disallowance under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, is specifically tailored to this operator for a limited period and is subject to consultation with the Australian Transport Bureau.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988) contain provisions that are crucial for the safe and compliant operation of Australian aircraft. Section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) empowers the Governor-General to make regulations, and subregulation 207(2) of CAR 1988 stipulates that an Australian aircraft must not be used in any class of operations unless it is equipped with instruments and equipment approved or directed by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA). Furthermore, subregulation 5(1) of CAR 1988 allows CASA to give such approvals or directions in Civil Aviation Orders (CAOs). For example, CAO 20.18 specifies the instruments and equipment required for Australian aircraft engaged in certain classes of operations, including the installation of flight data recorders (FDRs) on certain types of aircraft as outlined in Section 6 of CAO 20.18. Additionally, subregulation 21A(1) of CAR 1988 permits CASA to issue a design standard for an aircraft component when no appropriate design standard is in force. This regulation is supplemented by the technical requirements outlined in Appendix 1 of CAO 103.19, which details the parameters, ranges, accuracy, and recording intervals for FDRs. In the context of the exemption issued to National Jet Express Pty Ltd, trading as Cobham Aviation Services Australia – Regional Services, the operator is permitted to operate an aircraft that does not fully comply with CASA regulations. The aircraft in question was manufactured under United Kingdom regulations, which differ from those in Australia, and currently records data at 2-second intervals at certain altitudes, and only records the press to transmit from VHF No. 1, without capturing squat weight on wheels discrete information. CASA has issued an exemption (CASA EX66/10) to allow the operator additional time to find the necessary service bulletins and kits to modify the aircraft, thereby ensuring compliance with Australian standards. Under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (LIA), certain instruments are subject to disallowance by Parliament. Regulation 5A of CAR 1988 states that if CASA issues a direction in the form of a CAO and subsequently issues another direction that amends, varies, or repeals the CAO, the later instrument is a disallowable instrument. Subregulation 308(4) of CAR 1988 declares an exemption to be a disallowable instrument, and under subparagraph 6(d)(i) of the LIA, such an instrument is considered a legislative instrument for the purposes of section 5 of the LIA. As a result, this exemption is subject to tabling and disallowance in Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the LIA. Consultation with the Australian Transport Bureau has been completed, and they have agreed to the issuance of the exemption, which is specific to a particular operator and for a limited period. This exemption is designed to provide the operator with additional time to address the identified issues with their aircraft. The exemption commences on the day after it is registered and will cease to have effect at the end of 30 August 2011. It has been issued by the Director of Aviation Safety in accordance with subsection 73(2) of the Act.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Aviation Law
Instrument
Exemption
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Compliance Obligations
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.