Explanatory Statement
Civil Aviation Regulations 1988
Exemption — training and checking organisation, flight check system
Legislation
Section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) empowers the Governor-General to make regulations for the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation.
Subregulation 308 (1) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988) provides that CASA may exempt aircraft, or persons in, on, or otherwise associated with the operation of, the aircraft, from compliance with specified provisions of CAR 1988. Subregulation 308 (2) provides that before making an exemption, CASA must take into account any relevant considerations relating to the interests of safety. Subregulation 308 (3) provides that CASA may make an exemption subject to conditions specified in the exemption as being necessary in the interests of safety.
CAR 217 (1)
Subregulation 217 (1) of CAR 1988 requires that the operator of an aircraft with a maximum take-off weight of more than 5 700 kg must provide a training and checking organisation.
CASA has entered into an agreement with the Federal Aviation Administration of the United States of America. The airworthiness of the aircraft has been established. The nature of the short-term contract work makes it impractical for the Air Operator Certificate (AOC) holder to establish a training and checking organisation. However, an equivalent level of safety can be provided by ensuring that the operator meets the competency requirements stipulated by the National Aviation Authority (NAA) from the aircraft’s state of registry.
The instrument, therefore, exempts Machjet International Pty Ltd (the operator) from the requirement to have a training and checking organisation. Conditions on the exemption require that the operator must hold a discrete AOC for the aircraft which may only be operated for aerial surveying purposes. The aircraft may be flown in Australia only by a pilot who meets the NAA from the aircraft’s state of registry check and training proficiency requirements. The operator’s chief pilot must sight, verify and keep copies of the crew’s licences and proficiency check documents.
CAR 232
Subregulation 232 (2) of CAR 1988 provides that a flight check system is subject to prior approval of CASA and CASA may, at any time, require the system to be revised in a manner specified by CASA.
Subregulation 232 (5) of CAR 1988 provides that an aircraft must not be flown unless the flight check system has been approved by CASA and, if CASA has required the system to be revised, the system has been revised in a manner specified by CASA.
CASA considers that the requirement for the flight check system for the aircraft to be approved does not provide a significant enhancement to safety. The aircraft comes into Australia with a flight check system approved by the aircraft’s state of registry.
This exemption, therefore, exempts the operator of the aircraft from the requirement to have the flight check system separately approved.
As a condition on the exemption, the operator will be required to have a flight check system that complies with the aircraft’s state of registry standards.
Legislative Instruments Act
Subregulation 308 (4) of CAR 1988 declares an exemption to be a disallowable instrument. Under subparagraph 6 (d) (i) of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (the LIA), an instrument is a legislative instrument for section 5 of the LIA if it is declared to be a disallowable instrument under legislation in force before the commencement of the LIA. The exemption is, therefore, a legislative instrument and it is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the LIA.
Consultation
Consultation under section 17 of the LIA has not been undertaken in this case. The instrument is a remake of a previous instrument, CASA EX24/09, issued to the operator. This is an interim instrument to enable CASA to complete assessment of the operator’s application for an AOC.
The instrument commences on the day after it is registered and stops having effect at the end of 16 October 2009.
The exemption has been made by the Director of Aviation Safety, on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 84A (2) of the Act.
[Instrument number CASA EX54/09]
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 were amended in 2009 to include an exemption for Machjet International Pty Ltd, allowing the operator to be exempt from certain regulatory requirements while ensuring an equivalent level of safety. Enacted under the authority of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, these regulations are designed to maintain the safety of air navigation, with the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) empowered to make regulations for this purpose. The exemption was introduced to address the specific challenges faced by short-term contract operators who could not feasibly establish a training and checking organisation but could demonstrate an equivalent level of safety through compliance with the standards of the aircraft's state of registry. Conditions of the exemption include maintaining a discrete Air Operator Certificate for aerial surveying purposes only and ensuring that pilots meet the relevant check and training proficiency requirements from the aircraft’s state of registry. The operator is also required to verify crew licences and proficiency check documents. Furthermore, the exemption allows the operator to use a flight check system approved by the aircraft’s state of registry, subject to CASA's oversight and conditions to ensure compliance with those standards. This legislative instrument is subject to tabling and disallowance in Parliament under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988) provide for various exemptions from certain regulatory requirements to ensure that safety is not compromised while accommodating practical and operational needs. Specifically, the exemption under consideration allows Machjet International Pty Ltd to operate an aircraft without establishing a training and checking organisation, as the airworthiness of the aircraft has already been established by the Federal Aviation Administration of the United States of America. This exemption applies to the operator of an aircraft with a maximum take-off weight exceeding 5,700 kg, which is otherwise required to provide a training and checking organisation under CAR 217(1). The exemption is subject to conditions, including the requirement that the operator must hold a discrete Air Operator Certificate for the aircraft, which may only be used for aerial surveying purposes, and that pilots must meet the check and training proficiency requirements of the National Aviation Authority from the aircraft’s state of registry. Additionally, the exemption under CAR 232 allows the operator to use a flight check system approved by the aircraft’s state of registry, rather than requiring separate approval by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA). The exemption is subject to the condition that the flight check system must comply with the standards of the aircraft’s state of registry. This exemption is a legislative instrument, subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. The exemption is effective from the day after its registration and ceases to have effect at the end of 16 October 2009.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988) in this context concern the exemption from certain requirements related to training and checking organisations and flight check systems. Section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) empowers the Governor-General to make regulations for the Act, and subregulation 308(1) of CAR 1988 provides that the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) may exempt aircraft or persons associated with the operation of aircraft from compliance with specified provisions of CAR 1988, taking into account safety considerations. Subregulation 217(1) of CAR 1988 requires that the operator of an aircraft with a maximum take-off weight of more than 5,700 kg must provide a training and checking organisation. Subregulation 232(2) of CAR 1988 mandates that a flight check system is subject to prior approval by CASA, and subregulation 232(5) provides that an aircraft must not be flown unless the flight check system has been approved by CASA.
The obligations imposed on the parties governed by this Act are primarily safety-focused. Specifically, Machjet International Pty Ltd, as the operator of the aircraft, is required to comply with the conditions of the exemption issued by CASA. This includes holding a discrete Air Operator Certificate (AOC) for the aircraft, which may only be operated for aerial surveying purposes. Furthermore, the aircraft may be flown in Australia only by a pilot who meets the competency requirements stipulated by the National Aviation Authority (NAA) from the aircraft’s state of registry. The operator’s chief pilot must sight, verify, and keep copies of the crew’s licences and proficiency check documents. Additionally, the operator must ensure that the flight check system complies with the standards of the aircraft’s state of registry.
In terms of potential breaches and consequences, the instrument includes provisions that make it a legislative instrument subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (LIA). While consultation under section 17 of the LIA has not been undertaken in this case, as it is a remake of a previous instrument, failure to comply with the conditions of the exemption could result in civil or criminal penalties. The specifics of such penalties are not detailed in the text but generally, non-compliance with aviation regulations can lead to fines, imprisonment, or both, depending on the severity and nature of the breach. The instrument is effective from the day after it is registered and ceases to have effect at the end of 16 October 2009.