Explanatory Statement
Civil Aviation Regulations 1988
Exemption — from standard take-off and landing minima – Express Freighters Australia Pty Ltd
Legislation
Section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) empowers the Governor-General to make regulations for the Act and the safety of air navigation.
Under subregulation 257 (1) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988), CASA may determine the meteorological minima, that is the visibility requirements, for landing or take-off at an aerodrome. Under subregulation 257 (2), the determination must be published in AIP or NOTAMS. Under subregulations 257 (3) and (4), it is an offence for an aircraft to take off or land if an element of the meteorological minima for that operation is less than that determined for the aircraft at the aerodrome.
The determination of standard meteorological minima for take-off and landing was made in instrument CASA 237/10. The minima are also set out in AIP En Route 1.5, sections 4.3 and 4.4. If conditions are met, the minimum visibility for take-off inside or outside Australian territory is 550 metres. If conditions are met, the minimum visibility for landing inside or outside Australian territory is 800 metres, or 550 metres runway visual range. An exemption would be required to operate in lesser minimum visibility.
Under subregulation 308 (1) of CAR 1988, CASA may exempt aircraft, or persons in, on, or otherwise associated with the operation of, the aircraft, from compliance with specified provisions of CAR 1988. Under subregulation 308 (2), before making an exemption, CASA must take into account any relevant considerations relating to the interests of safety. Under subregulation 308 (3), CASA may make an exemption subject to any condition specified in the exemption as being necessary in the interests of safety. Under subregulation 308 (3A), it is an offence to contravene a condition of an exemption that is otherwise being relied upon for an operation.
CASA had issued an instrument (CASA EX67/10) exempting Boeing 737 aircraft operated by Express Freighters Australia Pty Ltd (the operator) from the standard meteorological minima for take-off and landing. This instrument revokes and replaces that exemption. The main differences between this instrument and CASA EX67/10 are that this instrument also applies to Boeing 767 aircraft and to low visibility landings. This instrument mirrors the conditions and standards that apply to Qantas Airways Limited as set out in CASA EX20/11.
Among other conditions, the operator must ensure that specified visibility standards are met for take-offs and landings, which may be performed only at aerodromes properly equipped to support the low visibility operations (LVOs) conducted under the exemption. Flight crew training, experience, recency and competency must meet specified benchmarks. Aircraft equipment must be maintained. Operational restrictions and limitations must be observed. Appropriate foreign approvals for the operations must be obtained. A range of documents for inspection must be carried on board the aircraft.
Legislative Instruments Act
Under subparagraph 6 (d) (i) of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (the LIA), an instrument is a legislative instrument for section 5 of the LIA if it is declared to be a disallowable instrument under legislation in force before the commencement of the LIA. Under subregulation 308 (4) of CAR 1988, an exemption is a disallowable instrument. The exemption is, therefore, a legislative instrument and it is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the LIA.
Consultation
Consultation under section 17 of the LIA has not been undertaken in this case. The instrument is required by the operator to enable low visibility take-offs and CAT II and CAT III landings inside and outside Australian territory consistent with the standards and requirements specified in the instrument which are not considered prejudicial to the interests of safety. The instrument has been requested by the operator and replaces instrument CASA 67/10, which also related to LVOs.
Office of Best Practice Regulation (OBPR)
The exemption would be of beneficial effect to the operator. The OBPR does not require preparation of a Regulation Impact Statement in this case because a preliminary assessment of business compliance costs in the context of the nature of the instrument indicates that it will have only a nil to low impact on business.
Making and commencement
The exemption has been made by the Director of Aviation Safety, on behalf of CASA, in accordance sections 73 and 82 of the Act.
The instrument commences on the day after registration. It stops having effect at the end of April 2013.
[Instrument number CASA EX53/11]