CASA EX52/10 – Exemption – time-in-service recording on maintenance release; Determination – non-application of part of Civil Aviation Order 100.5

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2010L01634 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Explanatory Statement

Civil Aviation Regulations 1988, Civil Aviation Order 100.5

Exemption — time-in-service recording on maintenance release

Determination — non-application of part of CAO 100.5

Section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) empowers the Governor-General to make regulations for the Act and the safety of air navigation.

 

Legislation — CAR 1988

Under subregulation 43B (1) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988), it is an offence if, on completion of a day’s flying operations, the owner, operator or pilot in command of the aircraft fails to record on the maintenance release the total timeinservice of the aircraft on that day.

Under subregulation 308 (1) of CAR 1988, CASA may exempt aircraft, or persons in, on, or otherwise associated with the operation of, the aircraft, from compliance with specified provisions of CAR 1988. Under subregulation 308 (2), before making an exemption, CASA must take into account any relevant considerations relating to the interests of safety. Under subregulation 308 (3), CASA may make an exemption subject to any condition specified in the exemption as being necessary in the interests of safety.

Background

Regulation 43B was inserted in CAR 1988 in 1992. Before this, the larger airlines were exempt from the requirement for such time-in-service recording. The larger airlines have, in the main, highly complex computerised infrastructures to control and manage aircraft maintenance. Regulation 43B presented these airlines with considerable difficulty because their computer programs are not programmed for this particular information and would require substantial alteration to enable compliance with regulation 43B. The kind of information involved is provided in an alternative form through the aircraft’s approved system of maintenance.

In these circumstances, CASA considers that the requirement for daily recording of time-in-service for each Class A aircraft is neither necessary nor appropriate.

Instrument — exemption

The instrument, therefore, exempts the owner, operator and pilot in command of a Class A aircraft from the specific time-in-service recording requirements of regulation 43B of CAR 1988. Class A aircraft are Australian aircraft certificated in the transport category or used under an Air Operator’s Certificate that authorises regular public transport operations.

Conditions

The exemption is subject to conditions. The operator of the aircraft must ensure that the aircraft’s approved system of maintenance includes an approved recording method for time-in-service which is sufficient to meet the continuing airworthiness requirements of the aircraft. The operator must also include details of the recording method in the operator’s maintenance control manual prepared for regulation 42ZY of CAR 1988.

Legislation — CAO 100.5

Under subregulation 43 (1) of CAR 1988, maintenance releases for Australian aircraft may only be issued in the manner and form that CASA directs or approves. Under subregulation 43 (2), CASA may give directions specifying the information to be entered on a maintenance release before it is issued. Under subregulation 5 (1), where CASA has power to issue directions it may do so in Civil Aviation Orders. Paragraph 6.5 of Civil Aviation Order 100.5 (CAO 100.5) contains directions specifying the information to be entered on a maintenance release.

Subparagraphs 6.5 (d), (e) and (f) of CAO 100.5 set out requirements to record timein-service and related information which, for the reasons mentioned above, are neither necessary nor appropriate for Class A aircraft.

Under paragraph 1.2 of CAO 100.5, CASA may issue a determination that a provision of CAO 100.5 does not apply to specified Australian aircraft. Under paragraph 1.3 of CAO 100.5, before making a determination, CASA must take into account any relevant safety considerations. Using this power, CASA has determined in the instrument that subparagraphs 6.5 (d), (e) and (f) of CAO 100.5 do not apply to Class A aircraft. The information that would otherwise be required to be recorded under subparagraphs 6.5 (d), (e) and (f) of CAO 100.5 is adequately dealt with under the conditions for the exemption. Hence, the exemption and the determination are combined in the same instrument.

CASA does not consider that the exemption or the determination will have a detrimental effect on the safety of air navigation.

Legislative Instruments Act

Under subregulation 308 (4) of CAR 1988, an exemption is a disallowable instrument. Under subparagraph 6 (d) (i) of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (the LIA), an instrument is a legislative instrument for section 5 of the LIA if it is declared to be a disallowable instrument under legislation in force before the commencement of the LIA. Under subsection 5 (4) of the LIA, if some provisions of an instrument are of a legislative character (i.e. the exemption) and others are not (i.e. the determination), the whole instrument is taken to be a legislative instrument. The instrument is, therefore, a legislative instrument and is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the LIA.

Consultation

Consultation under section 17 of the LIA has not been undertaken in this case. The instrument replaces, with the same scope and effect, a previous instrument which expires at the end of June 2010 and which was to facilitate the operation of Class A aircraft without affecting safety.

The instrument commences on 1 July 2010.  It stops having effect at the end of 30 June 2012.

The exemption has been made by the Director of Aviation Safety, on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 73 (2) of the Act.

[Instrument number CASA EX52/10]

Overview

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988), amended by the Civil Aviation Order 100.5 (CAO 100.5), were enacted to ensure the safety of air navigation in Australia. These regulations and orders are fundamental in governing the maintenance and operation of aircraft, including specific requirements for recording time-in-service on maintenance releases. However, these requirements posed challenges for larger airlines, particularly those with sophisticated computerised systems not programmed to record this specific information. Consequently, the need arose to address this gap by exempting certain aircraft and their operators from these specific recording requirements to maintain safety without unduly burdening airlines with unnecessary compliance tasks. The exemption and related determination were introduced by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) under the authority granted by the Civil Aviation Act 1988. The policy objective is to ensure that while maintaining the highest safety standards, the regulatory burden is balanced to facilitate efficient operations for larger airlines.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988) establish various requirements for the operation and maintenance of aircraft, including the recording of time-in-service on maintenance releases. Specifically, subregulation 43B(1) of CAR 1988 mandates that the owner, operator, or pilot in command of an aircraft must record the total time-in-service of the aircraft on each day. However, recognising the complexities faced by larger airlines with their sophisticated computer systems, the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) has the authority under subregulation 308(1) of CAR 1988 to exempt certain aircraft, or persons associated with their operation, from compliance with specified provisions of the regulations, provided safety considerations are met. Accordingly, the instrument exempts Class A aircraft, which are Australian aircraft certificated in the transport category or used under an Air Operator’s Certificate for regular public transport operations, from the time-in-service recording requirements of regulation 43B of CAR 1988. This exemption is subject to conditions ensuring the aircraft’s approved system of maintenance includes an approved recording method for time-in-service that meets airworthiness requirements and that these details are included in the operator’s maintenance control manual. The instrument also determines that certain subparagraphs of Civil Aviation Order 100.5 do not apply to Class A aircraft, as the required information is adequately managed under the exemption conditions. The instrument is a legislative instrument and is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of this legislation provide an exemption for Class A aircraft from certain time-in-service recording requirements. Specifically, subregulation 43B(1) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988) typically requires the owner, operator, or pilot in command of an aircraft to record the total time-in-service of the aircraft on a maintenance release at the end of each day’s flying operations. However, under the instrument, Class A aircraft, which are Australian aircraft certificated in the transport category or used under an Air Operator’s Certificate that authorises regular public transport operations, are exempt from this requirement. Instead, the exemption is subject to certain conditions, which will be discussed in the next paragraph. The obligations and requirements imposed by the Act and the Civil Aviation Order 100.5 (CAO 100.5) include ensuring that the aircraft’s approved system of maintenance includes an approved recording method for time-in-service. This recording method must be sufficient to meet the continuing airworthiness requirements of the aircraft. Additionally, the operator must include details of this recording method in the operator’s maintenance control manual. This manual is prepared in accordance with regulation 42ZY of CAR 1988. These conditions ensure that while the specific daily recording of time-in-service on a maintenance release is not required, the necessary information is still adequately recorded and managed within the approved system of maintenance. In terms of offences, penalties, or consequences for breach, the Act and the CAR 1988 impose certain civil and criminal consequences. Under subregulation 43B(1) of CAR 1988, it is an offence if, on completion of a day’s flying operations, the owner, operator, or pilot in command fails to record the total time-in-service of the aircraft on the maintenance release. This offence could result in civil penalties, including fines, and potentially criminal penalties if the breach is deemed severe enough. However, because the exemption applies to Class A aircraft, these requirements are not applicable to such aircraft, provided they comply with the conditions outlined in the exemption. The maximum penalties for such offences are not specified in the explanatory statement but generally would be determined by the severity of the breach and the regulatory framework in place at the time. Finally, it is important to note that this instrument is a legislative instrument under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (LIA) and is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament. The instrument was made by the Director of Aviation Safety, on behalf of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), in accordance with subsection 73(2) of the Civil Aviation Act 1988. The instrument commences on 1 July 2010 and stops having effect at the end of 30 June 2012.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Administrative Law
Civil Aviation Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Enforcement Powers
Compliance Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.