CASA EX46/10 – Exemption – from standard take-off and landing minima – Jetstar

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2010L01503 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Explanatory Statement

Civil Aviation Regulations 1988

Exemption — from standard take-off and landing minima  Jetstar

 

Section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) empowers the Governor-General to make regulations for the Act and the safety of air navigation.

 

Legislation

Under subregulation 257 (1) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988), CASA may determine the meteorological minima, that is the visibility requirements, for landing or take-off at an aerodrome. Under subregulation 257 (2), the determination must be published in AIP or NOTAMS. Under subregulation 257 (3), it is an offence for an aircraft to take off if an element of the meteorological minima for that operation is less than that determined for the aircraft at the aerodrome.

 

The determination of standard meteorological minima for take-off and landing was made in instrument CASA 146/08. The minima are also set out in AIP En Route 1.5, sections 4.3 and 4.4. If conditions are met, the minimum visibility for take-off inside or outside Australian territory is 500 metres (proposed to become 550 metres). If conditions are met, the minimum visibility for landing inside or outside Australian territory is 800 metres, or 550 metres RVR. An exemption would be required to operate in lesser minimum visibility.

 

Under subregulation 308 (1) of CAR 1988, CASA may exempt aircraft, or persons in, on, or otherwise associated with the operation of, the aircraft, from compliance with specified provisions of CAR 1988. Under subregulation 308 (2), before making an exemption, CASA must take into account any relevant considerations relating to the interests of safety. Under subregulation 308 (3), CASA may make an exemption subject to any condition specified in the exemption as being necessary in the interests of safety. Under subregulation 308 (3A), it is an offence to contravene a condition of an exemption that is otherwise being relied upon for an operation.

 

Following the approval of Melbourne airport for Category II and Category III operations, which enables operations to be conducted to lower minima than was previously permitted under various exemptions, a review of the rules governing low visibility operations has been conducted. New exemptions have been issued to various operators, both foreign and Australian, allowing them to use lower minima than

was previously the case. This exemption applies to Airbus A320 and A321 aeroplanes operated by Jetstar Airways Pty Limited (Jetstar) and states the lower minima for the aeroplanes, in respect of low visibility take-offs and CAT II landings, as well as the conditions for their use. For instance, the use of the lower minima will require a higher standard of runway lighting (see clause 13 in Schedule 2).

 

In essence, the operator must ensure that specified visibility standards are met for take-offs and landings that may be performed only at aerodromes properly equipped to support the low visibility operations conducted under the exemption. Flight crew training, experience, recency and competency must meet specified benchmarks. Aircraft equipment must be maintained. Operational restrictions and limitations must be observed. Appropriate foreign approvals for the operations must be obtained. A range of documents for inspection must be carried on board the aircraft.

 

Legislative Instruments Act

Under subparagraph 6 (d) (i) of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (the LIA), an instrument is a legislative instrument for section 5 of the LIA if it is declared to be a disallowable instrument under legislation in force before the commencement of the LIA. Under subregulation 308 (4) of CAR 1988, an exemption is a disallowable instrument. The exemption is, therefore, a legislative instrument and it is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the LIA.

 

Consultation

Consultation under section 17 of the LIA has not been undertaken in this case. The instrument is required by Jetstar to enable low visibility operations inside and outside Australian territory consistent with the standards and requirements specified in the instrument which are not considered prejudicial to the interests of safety.

 

Office of Best Practice Regulation

The exemption would be of beneficial effect to the operator. The Office of Best Practice Regulation has not required preparation of a Regulation Impact Statement in the case of exemptions for the same purpose because a preliminary assessment of business compliance costs in the context of the nature of the instruments indicates that they will have only a nil to low impact on business.

 

Making and commencement

The exemption has been made by the Director of Aviation Safety, on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 73 (2) of the Act.

 

The instrument comes into effect on the day after it is registered.. It stops having effect at the end of 30 June 2012.

 

[Instrument number CASA EX46/10]

 

Overview

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988) govern the safety of air navigation in Australia, with the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) having the authority to set and enforce meteorological minima for take-off and landing under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988. The regulations typically require a minimum visibility of 500 metres for take-off and 800 metres for landing, with lower minima permissible under specific exemptions. In 2010, an exemption was granted under subregulation 308 of CAR 1988 to Jetstar Airways Pty Limited, allowing its Airbus A320 and A321 aircraft to operate under lower visibility minima than the standard set by CASA, provided certain conditions are met. These conditions include higher standards for runway lighting, stringent requirements for flight crew training and experience, aircraft maintenance, operational restrictions, and the possession of appropriate foreign approvals. This exemption was enacted to facilitate low visibility operations at Melbourne Airport, which had been approved for Category II and Category III operations, thereby enabling operations under lower visibility conditions than previously allowed. The exemption is subject to disallowance in the Parliament under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, and it came into effect after registration, ceasing to have effect by the end of 30 June 2012.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988) under the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) provide the framework for aviation safety in Australia, with specific regulations governing take-off and landing minima at aerodromes. The regulations empower the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to determine these meteorological minima, which are essential for ensuring safe operations. However, the Act allows for exemptions from these standard minima under certain conditions, subject to safety considerations. The exemption in question applies specifically to Airbus A320 and A321 aeroplanes operated by Jetstar Airways Pty Limited, permitting them to operate under lower visibility conditions than the standard minima, provided certain conditions are met. These conditions include higher standards for runway lighting, stringent requirements for flight crew training and competency, specific operational restrictions, and the maintenance of aircraft equipment. The exemption is also subject to the obtaining of appropriate foreign approvals and the carrying of specified documents on board the aircraft. The exemption applies both inside and outside Australian territory, and it is effective until the end of June 2012, with the instrument coming into effect the day after it is registered.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988) contain specific provisions that allow for exemptions from standard take-off and landing minima for certain aircraft operations. Subregulation 257(1) of the CAR 1988 grants the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) the authority to determine meteorological minima, including visibility requirements, for landing or take-off at an aerodrome. These determinations must be published in the Aeronautical Information Publication (AIP) or Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) as per subregulation 257(2). It is an offence under subregulation 257(3) for an aircraft to take off if any element of the determined meteorological minima for that operation is less than what has been specified for the aircraft at the aerodrome. Subregulation 308(1) of the CAR 1988 permits CASA to exempt aircraft, or persons associated with the operation of the aircraft, from specified provisions of the CAR 1988. This exemption must be made with due consideration of safety as outlined in subregulation 308(2), and may be subject to conditions necessary for safety as per subregulation 308(3). Any contravention of these conditions is an offence under subregulation 308(3A). In the case of Jetstar Airways Pty Limited, an exemption has been issued allowing Airbus A320 and A321 aeroplanes to operate under lower visibility minima for take-offs and Category II landings, provided certain conditions are met, such as higher standards of runway lighting and specific operational restrictions. The obligations imposed on Jetstar under this exemption include ensuring that visibility standards are met, adhering to stringent flight crew training and experience requirements, maintaining aircraft equipment, observing operational limitations, obtaining appropriate foreign approvals, and carrying necessary documents on board the aircraft. These obligations are designed to ensure that the operations conducted under the exemption do not compromise safety. In the event of a breach of the exemption conditions, Jetstar could face civil or criminal penalties. The maximum penalties for contravening the conditions of an exemption or the meteorological minima are not explicitly stated in the provided text but are generally severe under aviation safety regulations. Non-compliance could result in fines, operational restrictions, or even the revocation of the exemption, thereby impacting the airline's ability to conduct low visibility operations. The exemption is subject to disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (LIA) as it is considered a disallowable instrument.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Administrative Law
Civil Aviation Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Offence Provisions
Compliance Obligations
Exemptions & Exclusions

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.