CASA EX44/13 - Exemption - use of ADS-B in aircraft operated by PT Garuda Indonesia

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2013L00717 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Explanatory Statement

Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998

Exemption  use of ADS-B in aircraft operated by PT Garuda Indonesia

 

Subsection 98 (1) of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) provides that the Governor-General may make regulations for the Act and the safety of air navigation.

 

Under section 27 of the Act, CASA may issue Air Operators Certificates (AOCs) with respect to aircraft for the purpose of safety regulation.

 

Under sections 27AB, 27AC and 27AD of the Act, applicants must, in particular circumstances, provide CASA with certain manuals and other information, and undertake proving flights, tests and demonstrations.

 

Under section 27AE of the Act, CASA may require an applicant for a foreign aircraft AOC to provide additional information.

 

Under section 28 of the Act, CASA must issue the AOC if satisfied that the applicant can comply with the requirements of Australian civil aviation safety legislation.

 

Under paragraph 28BA (1) (b) of the Act, an AOC has effect subject to any conditions specified in the regulations or the Civil Aviation Orders (the CAOs).

 

Part 82 of the CAOs specifies conditions on AOCs. Civil Aviation Order (CAO) 82.5 contains conditions on those AOCs that authorise regular public transport (RPT) operations in high capacity aircraft. As defined in paragraph 2.1 of CAO 82.0, high capacity aircraft are those certificated as having a maximum seating capacity exceeding 38 seats or a maximum payload exceeding 4 200 kilograms.

 

Subsection 10 of CAO 82.5 sets out obligations on operators who hold foreign aircraft AOCs for high capacity RPT operations in Australia (the relevant foreign operators).

 

CAO 82.5 amendment — foreign aircraft must comply from 12 December 2013

Previously, paragraph 10.8 of CAO 82.5 provided, in effect, that each relevant foreign operator must ensure that, if any of its aircraft carried and used Automatic Dependent Surveillance – Broadcast (ADS-B) equipment, it must do so in accordance with subsection 9B of CAO 20.18. Thus, there was no compulsion or requirement to carry or use ADS-B transmitting equipment that complied with the new standards unless the equipment was to be put to operational use. If noncomplying equipment was carried, it must be deactivated.

 

Civil Aviation Order 82.5 Amendment Instrument 2011 (No. 3) substitutes a new paragraph 10.8 to the effect that the operator of a foreign registered aircraft must ensure that, if the aircraft is operated in high capacity RPT operations, it complies with the requirements (directions) in a new Appendix 4.

 

The directions in Appendix 4 are virtually identical to the requirements for ADS-B imposed on Australian aircraft. Thus, fitment and operation of approved ADS-B avionics equipment is mandatory on and from 12 December 2013 for all foreign aircraft engaged in private operations at or above FL 290 (unless CASA has authorised otherwise). Approved equipment is that which meets the approved equipment configuration in Appendix 5.

 

ADS-B is presently being used for en route ATC surveillance and separation in the Australian FIR outside Secondary Surveillance Radar coverage. For that reason, Appendix 4 requires that any ADS-B transmissions by ADS-B equipped aircraft before the mandatory date of 12 December 2013 must comply with the technical standards in CAO 82.5; noncomplying transmissions must be disabled or transmit a NUCp (position integrity) value of zero. The PT Garuda Indonesia, of Jakarta Pusat, Indonesia (Garuda) A330-300 aircraft do not transmit position information in accordance with the technical standards. Under the exemption, CASA EX138/12, until such time as the non-complying Garuda aircraft transmit position information based on the standards, they were denied access to ADS-B based separation service by ATC, however, they were allowed use of the ADS-B equipment for identification purposes. CASA EX138/12 was to expire at the end of June 2013.

 

This instrument revokes and replaces instrument CASA EX138/12, extending its effect until the end of 12 December 2013. This is necessary because of unavoidable slippages in the installation of modification kits in the Garuda aircraft. After 12 December 2013, carriage of ADS-B equipment that complies with the technical standards will be compulsory.

 

Legislative Instruments Act

For subsection 98 (5A) of the Act, CASA may, by instrument, grant an exemption from compliance with a provision of the regulations. An instrument issued under paragraph 98 (5A) (a) of the Act is a legislative instrument if the instrument is expressed to apply to a class of persons or aircraft. The instrument applies to a class of persons. As a legislative instrument, it is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the Legislative Instrument Act 2003 (the LIA).

 

Consultation

Consultation under section 17 of the LIA was undertaken in relation to the replaced instrument, CASA EX138/12. CASA consulted with Airservices Australia and Garuda in relation to the use of the non-compliant ADS-B equipment. Garuda accepted the conditions in the instrument for use of the equipment for a limited purpose. Garuda has operated satisfactorily under the revoked instrument. It was not considered necessary to undertake further consultation in relation to its replacement which is in the same terms and only extends its operation for a period of months.

 

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights is at Attachment 1.

 

Making and commencement

The exemption has been made by a delegate of CASA relying on the power of delegation under subregulation 11.260 (1) of CASR 1998.

 

The exemption commences on the day after registration and stops having effect at the end of 12 December 2013 as if it had been repealed by another instrument.

[Instrument number CASA EX44/13]

Attachment 1

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011

 

Exemption under regulation 11.160  use of ADS-B equipment in aircraft
operated by PT Garuda Indonesia

 

This legislative instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

 

Overview of the legislative instrument

The legislative instrument permits PT Garuda Indonesia, of Jakarta Pusat, Indonesia (Garuda) A330-300 aircraft to use their ADS-B equipment for identification purposes only, until such time as the equipment complies with the relevant standards in Civil Aviation Order 82.5 for use of the equipment.

Human rights implications

This legislative instrument does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.

Conclusion

This legislative instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues.

Civil Aviation Safety Authority

Overview

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, amended by the Civil Aviation Order 82.5 Amendment Instrument 2011 (No. 3), address the gap in ensuring that foreign aircraft operating in Australian airspace adhere to specific safety standards, particularly concerning the use of Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) equipment. This amendment was introduced to align the ADS-B compliance requirements for foreign aircraft with those applicable to Australian aircraft, aiming to enhance safety and surveillance in Australian airspace. The Australian Parliament, through the Civil Aviation Act 1988, empowers the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue regulations and exemptions that ensure the safety of air navigation. The policy objective is to maintain consistent safety standards across all aircraft operating in Australia, preventing the use of non-compliant ADS-B equipment that could compromise surveillance and separation services provided by Air Traffic Control. The legislative instrument, CASA EX44/13, grants an exemption for PT Garuda Indonesia's A330-300 aircraft to use their ADS-B equipment solely for identification until it complies with the technical standards outlined in Civil Aviation Order 82.5.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, as amended by instrument CASA EX44/13, provides an exemption for PT Garuda Indonesia, operating Airbus A330-300 aircraft, from certain mandatory requirements concerning the use of Automatic Dependent Surveillance – Broadcast (ADS-B) equipment. This exemption applies to the specified aircraft of PT Garuda Indonesia, which are registered in Indonesia but operating in Australia. The exemption allows these aircraft to use their ADS-B equipment solely for identification purposes until they are upgraded to comply with the technical standards outlined in Civil Aviation Order 82.5. This exemption is limited to the Garuda aircraft and applies until the end of 12 December 2013, after which compliance with the ADS-B technical standards will be mandatory. The exemption is subject to conditions and is a legislative instrument under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, meaning it is subject to parliamentary scrutiny and disallowance. The instrument has been deemed compatible with human rights as it does not engage any of the rights or freedoms recognised in the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, as amended by the instrument F2013L00717, include a specific exemption (CASA EX44/13) that pertains to the use of Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) equipment in aircraft operated by PT Garuda Indonesia (Garuda). This exemption is detailed under the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations and is made in accordance with the authority granted to the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) by subsection 98(5A) of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act). Specifically, this exemption allows Garuda’s A330-300 aircraft to use their ADS-B equipment solely for identification purposes until the equipment complies with the standards specified in Civil Aviation Order (CAO) 82.5. This exemption extends the effect of the previous exemption (CASA EX138/12) until the end of 12 December 2013 due to delays in modifying the ADS-B equipment on the aircraft. Under this exemption, Garuda’s aircraft are required to ensure that their ADS-B equipment complies with the technical standards outlined in CAO 82.5. Until compliance is achieved, these aircraft must not use the ADS-B equipment for air traffic control (ATC) separation services. However, they may still use the equipment for identification purposes. This requirement is in place to maintain safety standards while allowing Garuda to continue some operational functionality with the ADS-B equipment during the transition period. This exemption is crucial for ensuring that Garuda’s operations do not disrupt ATC services, which depend on ADS-B compliance for surveillance and separation. The obligations imposed on Garuda under this exemption include ensuring that their ADS-B equipment is used strictly for identification purposes and not for ATC separation services until the equipment meets the specified standards. Additionally, Garuda must work towards achieving compliance with the technical standards by the end of 12 December 2013 to avoid any operational restrictions. CASA retains the authority to monitor compliance and may take enforcement actions if Garuda fails to adhere to the conditions of the exemption. Failure to comply with the conditions set forth in this exemption may result in significant consequences. Although specific penalties are not detailed in the explanatory statement, non-compliance with Civil Aviation Safety Regulations generally can lead to enforcement actions by CASA, which may include fines, suspension, or revocation of the Air Operators Certificate (AOC). Such actions are intended to ensure adherence to safety standards and to protect the integrity of the Australian airspace system.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Administrative Law
Civil Aviation Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Commencement Provisions
Regulatory Standards
Enforcement Powers
Prohibited Conduct

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.