Explanatory Statement
Civil Aviation Regulations 1988
Exemption – recency requirements for night flying – Virgin Australia Regional Airlines
Legislation
Section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) empowers the Governor-General to make regulations.
Subregulation 5.109 (1) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988) provides that a commercial (aeroplane) pilot (the holder of a commercial (aeroplane) pilot licence) must not fly an aeroplane carrying another person unless the pilot satisfies requirements set out in the subregulation.
Subregulation 5.170 (1) of CAR 1988 provides that an air transport (aeroplane) pilot (the holder of an air transport (aeroplane) pilot licence) must not fly an aeroplane carrying another person unless the pilot satisfies requirements set out in the subregulation.
Paragraphs 5.109 (1) (b) and 5.170 (1) (b) of CAR 1988 both mention certain requirements (recency requirements) that the pilot must have satisfied in the immediately preceding period of 90 days, being requirements relating to take-offs and landings at night. These requirements are that the pilot has, within the period, carried out at least 3 take-offs and 3 landings at night, while flying the aeroplane as pilot in command, or as pilot acting in command under supervision or in dual flying; alternatively, in that period the pilot must have satisfactorily completed an aeroplane proficiency check that was completed at night or passed a flight test that was conducted at night for the issue, or renewal, of an aeroplane pilot rating.
Subregulation 11.160 (1) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) provides that, for subsection 98 (5A) of the Act, CASA may grant an exemption from a provision of the regulations, including CAR 1988. Under subregulation 11.160 (2), an exemption may be granted to a person, or to a class of persons, and may specify the class by reference to membership of a specified body or any other characteristic.
Under subregulation 11.205 (1) of CASR 1998, CASA may impose conditions on an exemption if this is necessary in the interests of the safety of air navigation. Under regulation 11.225 of CASR 1998, an exemption must be published on the Internet. Under subregulation 11.230 (1), an exemption ceases on the day specified within it (but no longer than 3 years after its commencement) or, if no day is specified, 3 years after commencement.
Under subsection 33 (3) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, where an Act confers a power to make, grant or issue any instrument of a legislative or administrative character (including rules, regulations or by-laws), the power shall be construed as including a power exercisable in the like manner and subject to the like conditions (if any) to repeal, rescind, revoke, amend, or vary any such instrument.
Instrument
The exemption, issued under regulation 11.160 of CASR 1998 for subsection 98 (5A) of the Act, allows Virgin Australia Regional Airlines Pty Ltd (the operator) (Aviation Reference Number 075986), formerly Skywest Airlines Pty Ltd, to use an approved flight simulator to satisfy recency requirements instead of relying on flights in an aeroplane. It applies to 4 aeroplane types operated by the operator.
The exemption differs from paragraphs 5.109 (1) (b) and 5.170 (1) (b) of CAR 1988 in that it allows the recency requirement to be satisfied by 3 take-offs and 3 landings in the immediately preceding 90 days that have been carried out in an approved flight simulator or an aircraft of the same type. In addition, if it appears that the required number of take-offs and landings will not be possible, that period of 90 days can be extended up to a maximum of 120 days by the pilot having carried out a take-off and landing at night, during the last 30 days, while line flying under the supervision of a pilot who holds a delegation to issue or renew a rating or conduct a flight test. If neither of the previous requirements have been satisfied then the pilot would need to have successfully undertaken, in the immediately preceding 180 days, an approved test for requalification.
The conditions in the instrument are largely consistent with the requirements of the International Civil Aviation Organization and the European Joint Aviation Regulations.
The exemption would allow the operator to rely on flight simulators to meet the recency requirements and would also allow the operator to rely on normal line flying and on its training and checking organisation instead of requiring the pilot to undergo special flight tests as may be required by CASA. The tests and procedures in the training and checking organisation require approval by CASA.
Legislative Instruments Act
For subsection 98 (5A) of the Act, CASA may, by instrument, grant an exemption from compliance with a provision of the regulations or Civil Aviation Orders. An instrument issued under paragraph 98 (5A) (a) of the Act is a legislative instrument if the instrument is expressed to apply to a class of persons or aircraft. The exemption applies to a class of aircraft, and class of persons, employed by the operator. The exemption is, therefore, a legislative instrument and is subject to tabling and disallowances in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the Legislative Instrument Act 2003 (the LIA).
Consultation
Consultation within the aviation industry as a whole has not taken place. The exemption repeals and replaces a previous exemption (CASA EX58/12). The previous exemption applied only to Fokker F28–100, Fokker F50 or Airbus 320 aeroplanes operated by Skywest Airlines Pty Ltd. This exemption applies to the operator’s ATR 72, F50, F100 and A320 aeroplanes.
Any operator whose procedures and training and checking organisation are considered by CASA to make satisfactory provision for testing and training pilots for night flying operations would be granted an equivalent exemption.
Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights
A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights is at Attachment 1.
Office of Best Practice Regulation (OBPR)
A Regulation Impact Statement (RIS) is not required because the instrument is covered by a standing agreement between CASA and OBPR under which a RIS is not required (OBPR id: 14507).
Making and commencement
The exemption has been made by a delegate of CASA relying on the power of delegation under subregulation 11.260 (1) of CASR 1998.
The instrument commences on the day after registration. It expires at the end of March 2017, as if it had been repealed by another instrument.
[Instrument number CASA EX32/14
Attachment 1
Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights
Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011
Exemption – recency requirements for night flying –
Virgin Australia Regional Airlines
This legislative instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.
Overview of the legislative instrument
The legislative instrument exempts pilots in command operating Virgin Australia Regional Airlines Pty Ltd (the operator) aircraft from night flying recency requirements prescribed by paragraphs 5.109 (1) (b) and 5.170 (1) (b) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988.
The primary purpose of the exemption is to allow the operator to use approved type simulators to satisfy its pilot’s recency requirements and also provides a longer period in which recency is deemed to be current after a satisfactory proficiency check. The exemption is subject to conditions imposed by CASA in the interest of air safety.
Human rights implications
This legislative instrument does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.
Conclusion
This legislative instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues.
Civil Aviation Safety Authority