CASA EX25/07 - Exemption – Surveillance Australia Pty Ltd operations into Lord Howe Island

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2007L01845 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Explanatory Statement

Civil Aviation Regulations 1988

Exemption  Surveillance Australia Pty Ltd operations into Lord Howe Island

 

Under subsection 98 (1) of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act), the Governor-General may make regulations for the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation.

 

Under regulation 308 of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988), CASA may exempt aircraft, or persons in, on, or otherwise associated with the operation of the aircraft, from compliance with specified provisions of CAR 1988. Subregulation 308 (3) of CAR 1988 provides that CASA can impose conditions necessary in the interests of safety.

 

Subregulation 235 (2) of CAR 1988 provides that CASA may, for the purposes of ensuring the safety of air navigation, give directions setting out how to determine the maximum takeoff and landing weights of an aircraft. These are given by paragraph 4.1 of Civil Aviation Order 20.7.1B (CAO 20.7.1B) which provides for the determination of take-off weight limitations, paragraph 5.1 which provides for the determination of landing weight limitations and paragraph 11.1 which provides for the landing distance required.

 

Exemption CASA EX06/2005 was issued to allow Surveillance Australia Pty Ltd to operate into Lord Howe Island with some modifications of the abovementioned paragraphs. CASA EX06/2005 expired at the end of February 2007. This instrument replaces that exemption. Due to amendments of CAO 20.7.1B, the exemption now applies only to paragraph 4.1 to allow the runway end safety area (RESA) at the Lord Howe Island aerodrome to be taken into account when calculating the length of runway available for takeoff.

 

A RESA is an area symmetrical about the extended runway centre-line, primarily intended to reduce the risk of damage to an aeroplane undershooting or overrunning the runway. Generally, a RESA cannot be taken in account in the length of runway available for take-offs. Its bearing strength is often less than the bearing strength of the runway.

 

At Lord Howe Island, the RESAs are constructed to an equivalent standard to the runway. It is, therefore, acceptable for the departure end RESA to be used for take-offs, and is a safety enhancement that provides for more runway length than would otherwise be available.

 

The exemption allows the RESA to be used for this purpose. It also contains particulars of the relevant runway 10/28 and requirements to ensure the safety of operations under the exemption.

 

Legislative Instruments Act

The exemption is a legislative instrument for section 5 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (the LIA). It is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of that Act.

 

Consultation

Consultation under section 17 of the LIA has not been undertaken in this case. The instrument only renews a previous exemption for the operator.

 

The instrument comes into effect on the day after it is registered. It stops having effect at the end of May 2009.

 

The exemption has been made by the Deputy Chief Executive Officer, Strategy and Support, a delegate of CASA, under subregulation 7 (1) of CAR 1988.

 

[Instrument number CASA EX25/07]

Overview

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 were enacted to establish a comprehensive regulatory framework for civil aviation in Australia, addressing various aspects of aviation safety and operations. This regulatory framework is underpinned by the Civil Aviation Act 1988, which provides the legislative basis for the regulation of civil aviation. The Act empowers the Governor-General to make regulations for the safety of air navigation, and it is within this legislative mandate that CASA (Civil Aviation Safety Authority) has issued various exemptions and directions to ensure compliance with safety standards. For instance, regulation 308 of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 allows CASA to exempt certain operations from specified provisions, provided that such exemptions do not compromise safety. Exemption CASA EX06/2005, which was renewed as CASA EX25/07, was introduced to address a specific operational need for Surveillance Australia Pty Ltd operating into Lord Howe Island. This exemption, now subject to the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, allows for the use of the runway end safety area (RESA) in calculating the available runway length for take-offs, thereby enhancing safety and accommodating the unique characteristics of the Lord Howe Island aerodrome. The exemption is effective until the end of May 2009 and does not require parliamentary disallowance as it renews a previous exemption without introducing new policy objectives.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation (Exemption) Regulations 2007, specifically Exemption CASA EX25/07, pertains to the operations of Surveillance Australia Pty Ltd, allowing them to conduct flights into Lord Howe Island with certain modifications to the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988). This exemption applies to the aircraft operated by Surveillance Australia Pty Ltd and the personnel associated with their operations. The exemption is geographically targeted at the Lord Howe Island aerodrome, thus it applies within the jurisdictional reach of the Commonwealth under the Civil Aviation Act 1988. The exemption modifies the standard requirements for take-off weight limitations by allowing the runway end safety area (RESA) to be included in the calculation of the length of runway available for take-offs, a condition that is unique to the aerodrome at Lord Howe Island due to the construction standard of its RESA. This exemption is in place to enhance safety by utilising the RESA which is built to the same standard as the runway, thereby effectively extending the available runway length for take-offs. The exemption is a legislative instrument under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 and is subject to parliamentary scrutiny through tabling and disallowance provisions. Notably, the exemption excludes the need for consultation as stipulated under section 17 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, as it merely renews a previous exemption for the same operator.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988, specifically in section 308, empower the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to exempt certain aircraft or their operators from specific regulations under the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (section 98(1)) and to impose necessary conditions to ensure safety. This is particularly pertinent in the context of CASA EX06/2005, which was renewed to allow Surveillance Australia Pty Ltd to conduct operations into Lord Howe Island. The exemption, as outlined in the Civil Aviation Order 20.7.1B (CAO 20.7.1B), primarily concerns the calculation of the maximum take-off weights of aircraft, allowing for the inclusion of the runway end safety area (RESA) in the available runway length for take-offs (paragraph 4.1). This allowance is unique to the Lord Howe Island aerodrome, where the RESAs are constructed to the same standard as the runway itself, thereby enhancing safety and providing more runway length than would typically be available. Entities governed by the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988, such as Surveillance Australia Pty Ltd, must adhere to the conditions specified in CASA EX06/2005 to maintain compliance with aviation safety standards. The exemption stipulates specific details about the runway, including the departure end RESA, and outlines requirements to ensure the safety of operations. This includes compliance with safety measures and procedures set forth by CASA, ensuring that any deviations from standard regulations are balanced with adequate safety provisions. The entities must also ensure that their aircraft operations conform to the calculated take-off weights and landing distances, as detailed in CAO 20.7.1B. Failure to comply with the provisions outlined in CASA EX06/2005 can result in civil and criminal consequences. Under the Civil Aviation Act 1988, breaches of the Act or the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 can lead to enforcement actions by CASA. Civil penalties can include fines, and in severe cases, criminal charges can be brought against individuals responsible for the breach. While the specific penalties are not detailed in the instrument, they can be significant, reflecting the importance of adhering to safety regulations in aviation. The exemption itself is subject to parliamentary oversight and disallowance under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, which means that any potential legislative changes or disapproval by Parliament can affect its continued validity.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Civil Aviation Law
Instrument
Exemption
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Safety Enhancements

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.