Explanatory Statement
Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998
Exemption – from standard take-off minima – Virgin Australia International Airlines
Legislation
Section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) empowers the Governor-General to make regulations for the Act and the safety of air navigation.
Subsection 98 (5A) of the Act provides that the Regulations may empower CASA to issue instruments in relation to the following:
(a) matters affecting the safe navigation and operation, or the maintenance, of aircraft; or
(b) the airworthiness of, or design standards for, aircraft.
Subregulation 11.160 (1) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) provides that, for subsection 98 (5A), CASA may grant an exemption from a provision of the Regulations, including the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988) or a provision of the Civil Aviation Orders, in relation to a matter mentioned in that subsection. Under subregulation 11.160 (2), an exemption may be granted to a person, or to a class of persons, and may specify the class by reference to membership of a specified body or any other characteristic.
Under subregulation 11.205 (1) of CASR 1998, CASA may impose conditions on an exemption if this is necessary in the interests of the safety of air navigation. Under regulation 11.225 of CASR 1998, an exemption must be published on the Internet. Under subregulation 11.230 (1), an exemption ceases on the day specified within it (but no longer than 3 years after its commencement) or, if no day is specified, 3 years after commencement.
Under subregulation 257 (1) of the CAR 1988 CASA may determine the meteorological minima, that is the visibility requirements, for landing or take-off at an aerodrome. Under subregulation 257 (2), the determination must be published in AIP or NOTAMS. Under subregulation 257 (3), it is an offence for an aircraft to take off if an element of the meteorological minima for that operation is less than that determined for the aircraft at the aerodrome.
The determination of standard meteorological minima for take-off and landing was made in instrument CASA 70/11. The minima are also set out in AIP En Route 1.5, section 4.3. If conditions are met, the minimum visibility for take-off inside or outside Australian territory is 550 metres. An exemption would be required to operate in lesser minimum visibility.
CASA had issued an instrument (CASA EX125/11) exempting B737 NG and other types of aeroplanes operated by Virgin Australia Airlines Pty Limited (Virgin Australia) from the standard meteorological minima for take‑off. This exemption will allow Virgin Australia International Airlines Pty Ltd to operate B737 NG aircraft in low visibility conditions on the same terms as Virgin Australia. The same aircraft will be operated under the new exemption.
All conditions remain unaltered. The operator must ensure that specified visibility standards are met for take-offs, which may be performed only at aerodromes properly equipped to support them. Flight crew training, experience, recency and competency must meet specified benchmarks. Aircraft equipment must be maintained. Operational restrictions and limitations must be observed. Appropriate foreign approvals for the operations must be obtained. A range of documents for inspection must be carried on board the aircraft.
Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (the LIA)
Subsection 98 (5AA) of the Act states that an instrument issued under paragraph (5A) (a) is a legislative instrument if it applies to a class of persons or a class of aircraft. This exemption applies to classes of aircraft and so is a legislative instrument.
Consultation
Consultation under section 17 of the LIA has not been undertaken in this case. The instrument is required by the operator to enable low visibility take-offs inside and outside Australian territory consistent with the standards and requirements specified in the instrument which are not considered prejudicial to the interests of safety.
Office of Best Practice Regulation (OBPR)
The exemption would be of beneficial effect to the operator. OBPR does not require preparation of a Regulation Impact Statement in this case because a preliminary assessment of business compliance costs in the context of the nature of the instrument indicates that it will have only a nil to low impact on business.
Compatibility with human rights and freedoms
This instrument does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms. It is compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues.
Making and commencement
The instrument has been made by a delegate of CASA relying on the power of delegation under subregulation 11.260 (1) of CASR 1998.
The instrument commences on the day after registration. It stops having effect at the end of 30 November 2013.
[Instrument number CASA EX184/12]