CASA EX17/08 - Exemption - validation flight checks for AA

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2008L00561 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Explanatory Statement

Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998

Exemption  validation flight check for AA

Legislation

Subsection 98 (1) of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) provides that the GovernorGeneral may make regulations for the Act and the safety of air navigation.

Validation flights for terminal instrument flight procedures

Under subregulation 173.095 (1) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998), a certified designer must ensure that each terminal instrument flight procedure (TIFP) designed under the designer’s procedure design certificate (PDC) is validated by a CASA pilot in accordance with any applicable standards set out in the Manual of Standards Part 173 — Standards Applicable to Instrument Flight Procedure Design (the MOS).

Under paragraph (a) of the definition of CASA pilot in subregulation 173.095 (2) of CASR 1998, a CASA pilot means a pilot who is an officer of CASA. Under paragraph (b) of the definition, the CASA pilot must be someone who meets the standards in the MOS for carrying out a validation flight check (VFC).

Under paragraph 6.1.2.4 of the MOS, CASA must arrange for a CASA officer, who is a qualified validation pilot, to conduct the flight validation. Under paragraph 7.1.5.3 of the MOS, the type of aircraft to be used for the flight validation of a TIFP is to be approved by the CASA validation pilot. Under paragraph 6.1.2.5 of the MOS, the certified designer must provide an aircraft of a type approved by the CASA officer conducting the flight validation.

Paragraph 7.1.24.1 of the MOS sets out in detail the standard for the qualifications and experience of pilots in command of TIFP validation flights. The person must hold an air transport pilot’s licence (ATPL) and a command instrument rating endorsed for the TIFP in question. He or she must have multi-engine I.F.R. procedures experience. He or she must have completed a course in, and have a thorough knowledge of, the International Civil Aviation Organization Procedures for Air Navigation Services  Aircraft Operations (ICAO Doc 8168, Vols. I and II) (ICAO PANSOPS) procedures design principles and methods. ICAO PANS-OPS is the international standard for design of TIFP. He or she must hold CASA certificates certifying completion of CASA courses on flight validation, aerodrome lighting and visual approach slope guidance. He or she must also hold a CASA low flying permit and have completed a flight validation flight in the previous 12 months.

Exemption from CASR 1998

Under subregulation 11.160 (1) of CASR 1998, CASA may grant an exemption from compliance with a provision of CASR 1998. Under regulation 11.160 (3), CASA may grant an exemption of its own initiative. Under subregulation 11.170 (3), in deciding whether to grant an exemption, CASA must regard as paramount the preservation of an acceptable level of safety. Under subregulation 11.205 (1), CASA may impose conditions on an exemption if this is necessary in the interests of the safety of air navigation. Under regulation 11.210, it is an offence to fail to comply with a condition of an exemption.

Under regulation 11.225 of CASR 1998, an exemption must be published on the World Wide Web. Under subregulation 11.230 (1), an exemption ceases on the day specified within it (but no longer than 2 years after its commencement), or if no day is specified, 2 years after commencement.

Airservices Australia

Airservices Australia (AA) has CASA’s approval to design TIFP.

CASA does not have readily available sufficient CASA officers with appropriate flying qualifications to carry out required TIFP VFCs.

CASA has, therefore, contracted with Radiola Aerospace Pty Ltd (Radiola) to carry out TIFP VFCs. CASA is satisfied that Radiola, and 3 specific, named, pilots engaged by it, have the competence and qualifications to carry out VFC in accordance with the requirements of the MOS.

Exemption and conditions

The instrument, therefore, exempts AA from the requirements of regulation 173.095 of CASR 1998, repeated in similar form in paragraph 6.1.2.4 of the MOS, that VFCs must be conducted by a pilot who is a CASA officer.

The instrument also exempts AA from the requirements of paragraph 6.1.2.5 and  paragraph 7.1.5.3 of the MOS, that the aircraft to be provided by the designer (AA) must be approved by the CASA officer conducting the flight.

The other legislative standards and requirements for the validation flights remain unchanged.

The exemption is subject to safety conditions.

Validation of an AA TIFP may only be conducted in accordance with the agreement between CASA and Radiola, known as the Agreement Between Radiola Aerospace Pty Ltd and the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) Flight Revalidation of Instrument Flight Procedures and Aerodrome Lighting Systems Agreement No. 06/144-00.

An AA TIFP may only be validated by 1 or more of the named pilots under engagement with Radiola. Two notes reinforce first, that each validation pilot must meet the standards for a pilot set out in paragraph 7.1.24 of the MOS, mentioned above, and secondly, that under subregulation 173.095 (1) of CASR 1998, the validations must be in accordance with the applicable standards in the MOS.

To avoid any doubt about the effect of the exemption from the requirements of paragraph 6.1.2.5 of the MOS, that the aircraft must be provided by the designer and approved by the CASA officer conducting the flight, a condition requires that, for validation of an AA TIFP, AA must provide an aircraft of a type approved by CASA.

Further conditions require that AA must give CASA at least 7 days written notice of any proposed validation activity, including of any proposed use of a flight simulator for purposes related to a validation. AA and each validation pilot must also allow CASA officers to observe any validation activity on request.

Legislative Instruments Act

Under subparagraph 6 (d) (i) of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (the LIA), an instrument is a legislative instrument for section 5 of the LIA if it is declared to be a disallowable instrument under legislation in force before the commencement of the LIA. Regulation 11.215 of CASR 1998 declares an exemption of this kind to be a disallowable instrument. The exemption is, therefore, a legislative instrument and it is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the LIA.

Consultation

Consultation under section 17 of the LIA has not been undertaken in this case. The instrument is to enable AA to proceed with the validation of its TIFP in circumstances that CASA considers safe, namely using aviation experts who have entered into arrangements with CASA for the performance of this work.

The instrument commences on 25 February 2008, after it is registered, and ceases to have effect at the end of 2 years.

The exemption has been made by a delegate of CASA, in accordance with subregulation 7 (1) of CAR 1988.

[Instrument number CASA EX17/08]

Overview

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) were enacted to provide comprehensive regulations for the safety of air navigation in Australia. The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 Exemption — validation flight check for AA instrument is a legislative instrument introduced to address a specific problem concerning the validation flight checks (VFC) for terminal instrument flight procedures (TIFP). The exemption was introduced because the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) did not have sufficient CASA officers with the appropriate flying qualifications to conduct the required VFCs. Consequently, CASA contracted with Radiola Aerospace Pty Ltd to carry out these VFCs. The instrument exempts Airservices Australia (AA) from certain provisions of the CASR 1998 and the Manual of Standards Part 173 (MOS), while maintaining other legislative standards and requirements for the validation flights. The exemption is subject to specific safety conditions, including that the validation of AA TIFPs may only be conducted in accordance with an agreement between CASA and Radiola, and by named pilots engaged by Radiola. This exemption ensures that TIFP validations proceed safely while CASA works to address its shortage of qualified officers.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) establish comprehensive safety standards for air navigation in Australia, with the overarching aim of maintaining an acceptable level of safety. Under subregulation 173.095 of CASR 1998, a certified designer is required to ensure that each terminal instrument flight procedure (TIFP) designed is validated by a CASA pilot in accordance with the Manual of Standards Part 173. However, this requirement is subject to exemptions which may be granted by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) under subregulation 11.160 of CASR 1998. In this instance, CASA has granted an exemption to Airservices Australia (AA), allowing them to proceed with the validation of TIFPs using a contracted aviation expert, Radiola Aerospace Pty Ltd, instead of a CASA officer, due to a shortage of appropriately qualified CASA officers. The exemption applies specifically to AA and the named pilots engaged by Radiola, subject to stringent safety conditions including adherence to the standards set out in the Manual of Standards and the Agreement Between Radiola Aerospace Pty Ltd and CASA. The exemption is subject to disallowance under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 and is effective for a period of two years, commencing on 25 February 2008.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) mandate that each terminal instrument flight procedure (TIFP) must be validated by a CASA pilot in accordance with the Manual of Standards Part 173 (MOS). This requirement is detailed in subregulation 173.095(1) of CASR 1998, which specifies that the validation flight check (VFC) must be conducted by a CASA officer, who is defined in subregulation 173.095(2). Paragraph 6.1.2.4 of the MOS further stipulates that CASA must arrange for a qualified CASA officer to conduct the flight validation, while paragraph 7.1.5.3 of the MOS requires the type of aircraft to be used for the flight validation to be approved by the CASA officer. Additionally, paragraph 6.1.2.5 of the MOS mandates that the aircraft used for the validation must be of a type approved by the CASA officer conducting the flight. The detailed qualifications and experience requirements for pilots in command of TIFP validation flights are outlined in paragraph 7.1.24.1 of the MOS. The obligations imposed on the parties under the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 include the requirement for a certified designer to ensure that each TIFP is validated by a CASA pilot. This is a critical safety measure to maintain the integrity and safety of the flight procedures. Furthermore, CASA has the authority to grant exemptions from compliance with CASR 1998 provisions, as outlined in subregulation 11.160(1). This exemption is subject to conditions that are necessary for the safety of air navigation, and failure to comply with these conditions is an offence under regulation 11.210. Additionally, any exemption granted must be published on the World Wide Web and will cease no later than two years after its commencement unless otherwise specified. Under the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, there are specific offences and penalties for non-compliance with the requirements and conditions of the exemption. Regulation 11.210 sets out that it is an offence to fail to comply with a condition of an exemption. The nature and severity of the penalties for these offences are not explicitly stated in the document, but it is implied that non-compliance could result in significant civil or criminal consequences. The exemption is also subject to disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, making it a disallowable instrument. The instrument commences on 25 February 2008 and will cease to have effect at the end of two years unless otherwise specified.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Aviation Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Compliance Obligations
Offence Provisions
Transitional Provisions

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.