CASA EX163/12 - Exemption - recency requirements for night flying (Virgin Australia International Airlines Pty Ltd)

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2012L02146 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Explanatory Statement

Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998

Exemption — recency requirements for night flying (Virgin Australia International Airlines Pty Ltd)

 

Legislation

Section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) empowers the Governor-General to make regulations.

 

Subregulation 5.109 (1) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988) provides that a commercial (aeroplane) pilot (the holder of a commercial aeroplane pilot licence) must not fly an aeroplane carrying another person unless the pilot satisfies requirements set out in the subregulation.

 

Subregulation 5.170 (1) of CAR 1988 provides that an air transport (aeroplane) pilot (the holder of an air transport aeroplane pilot licence) must not fly an aeroplane carrying another person unless the pilot satisfies requirements set out in the subregulation.

 

Paragraphs 5.109 (1) (b) and 5.170 (1) (b) of CAR 1988 both mention certain requirements (recency requirements) that the pilot must have satisfied in the immediately preceding period of 90 days, being requirements relating to take-offs and landings at night. These requirements are that the pilot has, within the period, carried out at least 3 take-offs and 3 landings at night, while flying the aeroplane as pilot in command, or as pilot acting in command under supervision or in dual flying; alternatively, in that period, the pilot must have satisfactorily completed an aeroplane proficiency check that was completed at night or passed a flight test that was conducted at night for the issue, or renewal, of an aeroplane pilot rating.

 

Subregulation 11.160 (1) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) provides that, for subsection 98 (5A) of the Act, CASA may grant an exemption from a provision of the regulations, including CAR 1988, or a provision of the Civil Aviation Orders (the CAOs). Under subregulation 11.160 (2), an exemption may be granted to a person, or to a class of persons, and may specify the class by reference to membership of a specified body or any other characteristic.

 

Under subregulation 11.205 (1) of CASR 1998, CASA may impose conditions on an exemption if this is necessary in the interests of the safety of air navigation. Under regulation 11.225 of CASR 1998, an exemption must be published on the Internet. Under subregulation 11.230 (1), an exemption ceases on the day specified within it (but no longer than 3 years after its commencement) or, if no day is specified, 3 years after commencement.

 

The exemption allows Virgin Australia International Airlines Pty Ltd (the operator) to use an approved flight simulator to satisfy recency requirements instead of relying on flights in an aeroplane. It renews an exemption (CASA EX79/10). There have been no changes to the terms of the exemption.

 

The exemption would allow the operator to rely on flight simulators to meet the recency requirements and would also allow the operator to rely on normal line flying and on its training and checking organisation instead of requiring the pilot to undergo special flight tests as may be required by CASA. The tests and procedures in the training and checking organisation require approval by CASA.

 

Legislative Instruments Act

For subsection 98 (5A) of the Act, CASA may, by instrument, grant an exemption from compliance with a provision of the regulations or the CAOs. An instrument issued under paragraph 98 (5A) (a) of the Act is a legislative instrument if the instrument is expressed to apply to a class of persons or aircraft. The exemption applies to a class of persons. The exemption is, therefore, a legislative instrument subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the Legislative Instrument Act 2003.

 

Compatibility with human rights and freedoms

This instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011 as it does not raise any human rights issues. It does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms. It is an exemption to allow an aircraft operator to pursue certain training procedures.

 

Consultation

Consultation within the aviation industry as a whole has not taken place. The instrument replaces an exemption previously granted to the operator without making any changes.

 

Compatibility with human rights and freedoms

This instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011 as it does not raise any human rights issues. It does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.

 

Commencement and making

The exemption commences on the day of registration and stops having effect at the end of 31 October 2013.

 

The exemption has been made by a delegate of CASA under regulation 11.260 of CASR 1998.

 

[Instrument number CASA EX163/12]

Overview

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 were amended to create an exemption for Virgin Australia International Airlines Pty Ltd, allowing the operator to use an approved flight simulator to satisfy recency requirements instead of relying on flights in an aeroplane. This amendment was introduced to address the operational needs of the airline while ensuring safety standards are maintained. The exemption was enacted under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, empowering the Governor-General to make regulations. The primary objective of this exemption is to enable the airline to rely on its approved training and checking organisation for meeting the recency requirements, thereby reducing the need for pilots to undergo special flight tests as may be required by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA). This legislative instrument is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. The exemption is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011, as it does not raise any human rights issues.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) provide for an exemption from certain recency requirements for night flying for Virgin Australia International Airlines Pty Ltd. This exemption applies to the operator, allowing it to use an approved flight simulator to meet the recency requirements instead of relying solely on flights in an aeroplane. The exemption renews a previous exemption (CASA EX79/10) without any changes to its terms. It enables the operator to meet the recency requirements through flight simulators and normal line flying, in addition to its training and checking organisation, as long as these are approved by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA). This exemption is granted under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, which empowers the Governor-General to make regulations. The exemption is a legislative instrument and, as such, is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. The exemption is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011 as it does not raise any human rights issues. The exemption commences on the day of registration and will cease to have effect at the end of 31 October 2013. It has been made by a delegate of CASA under regulation 11.260 of CASR 1998.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, as amended by this legislation (F2012L02146), specifically address the recency requirements for night flying by granting an exemption to Virgin Australia International Airlines Pty Ltd. Under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, the Governor-General is empowered to enact these regulations. Subregulations 5.109(1) and 5.170(1) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988) outline that commercial and air transport aeroplane pilots must satisfy certain recency requirements to fly an aeroplane carrying another person. These requirements include completing at least three take-offs and three landings at night within the preceding 90 days or passing a relevant proficiency check or flight test. The exemption allows Virgin Australia International Airlines Pty Ltd to use an approved flight simulator to meet these recency requirements instead of relying solely on actual night flights. This change enables the airline to satisfy the regulatory requirements through alternative means, specifically flight simulators, while continuing their normal operations. This exemption imposes specific obligations on Virgin Australia International Airlines Pty Ltd. The airline must ensure that its pilots meet the stipulated recency requirements through the approved flight simulator or other approved methods. The exemption allows the airline to utilise its training and checking organisation, which must have CASA approval. The organisation's procedures must meet the safety standards set by CASA, ensuring that pilots are adequately trained and proficient in night flying operations. The exemption requires the airline to maintain records and documentation to demonstrate compliance with the regulatory requirements, including proof of simulator training and any other approved training methods. There are no explicit offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences detailed in this particular exemption for failure to comply with the conditions. However, non-compliance with the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 in general could result in enforcement actions by CASA, including the possibility of fines, suspension, or revocation of the airline's operating licence. The severity of the penalties would depend on the nature and extent of the non-compliance and could be determined by CASA under its regulatory authority. The exemption itself, while providing flexibility, must still be operated within the overarching framework of aviation safety regulations to ensure the highest standards are maintained.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Administrative Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Delegated & Subordinate Legislation
Exemptions & Exclusions
Enforcement Powers
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.