CASA EX14/16 - Exemption - aircraft operating without carriage of Mode S transponder equipment (Picture This Ballooning)

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2016L00058 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Explanatory Statement

Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998

Exemption — aircraft operating without carriage of Mode S transponder equipment (Picture This Ballooning)

 

Legislation

Section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) empowers the Governor-General to make regulations for the safety of air navigation.

 

Subregulation 207 (2) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988) provides that a person must not use an Australian aircraft in a class of operation if it is not fitted with such instruments, or is not fitted with or carrying such equipment, as CASA has approved and directed. Under subregulation 5 (1) of CAR 1988, where CASA may issue directions under CAR 1988, it may do so in the form of a Civil Aviation Order (CAO).

 

CAO 20.18 sets out directions issued by CASA under regulation 207 of CAR 1988 in relation to the instruments and equipment to be carried on board aircraft. Paragraph 9E.2 of CAO 20.18 provides, among other things, that an aircraft first registered on or after 6 February 2014 that is operated in Class A, B, C or E airspace, or above 10 000 feet above mean sea level in Class G airspace, must carry a serviceable Mode S transponder that meets specified standards. Paragraph 9E.2 also applies to an aircraft that is modified by having its transponder installation replaced on or after 6 February 2014.

 

Under subregulation 11.160 (1) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998), for subsection 98 (5A) of the Act, CASA may grant an exemption from a provision of a CAO in relation to matters affecting the safe navigation and operation of aircraft.

 

Under regulation 11.225 of CASR 1998, an exemption must be published on the Internet. Under subregulation 11.230 (1), an exemption ceases on the day specified within it (but no longer than 3 years after its commencement) or, if no day is specified, 3 years after commencement.

 

Background

Picture This Ballooning Pty Ltd (the operator) is a Melbourne-based hot air balloon company that operates a fleet of hot air balloons. The fleet of balloons share a small number of transponders. The transponders are fitted to the basket of the balloon, but it is the balloon envelope – not the basket – that bears the aircraft registration marking. It is common for baskets (with variable size and passenger capacity) to be swapped between balloon envelopes to match the needs of each operation and, therefore, there is no specific association between a balloon envelope and a basket. Transponders fitted to baskets may also be removed from baskets and reinstalled in other baskets.

 

The use of Mode S transponders require a 24-bit code to match the envelope registration marking for each flight, but given that baskets and fitted transponders frequently alternate between balloon envelopes, there is reasonable and ongoing commensurate risk that coding errors could be made, therefore, reducing aviation safety. The operator’s balloons are currently fitted with Mode A/C transponders that do not have the requirement for a 24-bit code but still allow visibility on air traffic control radar and by other aircraft equipped with traffic advisory systems.

 

The operator operates 1 balloon registered after 6 February 2014 which is not compliant with the requirements of paragraph 9E.2 of CAO 20.18. The other balloons in the operator’s fleet were registered before 6 February 2014 but are, nevertheless, captured within the scope of paragraph 9E.2 by virtue of having their transponders replaced (that is, swapped with another balloon) on or after 6 February 2014 without being compliant with the Mode S transponder requirements.

 

The operator has requested an exemption from the requirements of paragraph 9E.2 for its fleet of balloons. CASA has, in consultation with Airservices Australia, assessed the operator’s safety case and considers that the exemption will have no significant adverse safety impact, but rather reduces the complexity of the operator’s ballooning operations and the risk of transponder coding errors. The operator’s balloons will have at all times an operative Mode A/C transponder.

 

Instrument

CASA EX14/16 applies to the operator’s balloon aircraft mentioned in Schedule 1 of the instrument. The instrument exempts the aircraft from complying with the Mode S transponder requirements in paragraph 9E.2 of CAO 20.18.

 

The exemption is subject to the condition that a person using the aircraft must ensure that all I.F.R. flight plans in Australian airspace are annotated with the words RMK/CASA MODE S EXEMPT in Item 18 of the flight plan. A note has been inserted to advise that the Airservices Australia automated systems will reject a flight plan lodged for these aircraft without this annotation.

 

Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (the LIA)

Under regulation 5A of CAR 1988, if CASA has issued a CAO, and CASA later issues an exemption that affects the operation of the CAO, the later document is declared to be a disallowable instrument. Under subparagraph 6 (d) (i) of the LIA, an instrument is a legislative instrument for section 5 of the LIA if it is declared to be a disallowable instrument under legislation in force before the commencement of the LIA. CAR 1988 was in force before the commencement of the LIA.

 

This instrument affects the operation of paragraph 9E.2 of CAO 20.18 and is, therefore, a legislative instrument, subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the LIA.

 

Consultation

The operator has requested this instrument and has provided CASA with a satisfactory safety case. CASA has consulted Airservices Australia on the proposed operations and exemption. It is CASA’s view that no further consultation under section 17 of the LIA is necessary or appropriate.

 

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights is at Attachment 1.

 

Office of Best Practice Regulation (OBPR)

A Regulation Impact Statement (RIS) is not required because the instrument is covered by a standing agreement between CASA and OBPR under which a RIS is not required for exemptions (OBPR id: 14507).

 

Making and commencement

The instrument has been made by the Director of Aviation Safety, on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 73 (2) of the Act.

 

The instrument commences on the day of registration and expires at the end of December 2018, as if it had been repealed by another instrument.

 

[Instrument number CASA EX14/16]

Attachment 1

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011

 

Exemption — aircraft operating without carriage of Mode S transponder equipment (Picture This Ballooning)

 

This legislative instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

 

Overview of the legislative instrument

The legislative instrument exempts specified balloon aircraft operated by Picture This Ballooning Pty Ltd (the operator) from compliance with paragraph 9E.2 of Civil Aviation Order 20.18, which requires the aircraft to be equipped with a serviceable Mode S transponder that meets specified standards.

 

The purpose of the instrument is to allow the operator and persons using the aircraft to continue to operate the aircraft without meeting equipment requirements that, due to the nature of the operator’s ballooning operations (such as switching transponders and baskets between different balloon envelopes), would increase the risk of transponder coding errors. The exemption is subject to a condition imposed in the interests of aviation safety.

 

Human rights implications

This legislative instrument does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.

 

Conclusion

This legislative instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues.

Civil Aviation Safety Authority

Overview

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, as amended by the legislative instrument CASA EX14/16, address a specific operational challenge faced by Picture This Ballooning Pty Ltd, a Melbourne-based hot air balloon operator. This exemption was introduced to alleviate safety concerns associated with the frequent swapping of transponders between different balloon envelopes, which poses a risk of coding errors that could compromise aviation safety. The exemption was enacted by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, allowing CASA to regulate matters affecting the safe navigation and operation of aircraft. The primary policy objective of this exemption is to enable the operator to continue its ballooning activities with a reduced risk of transponder coding errors, thereby maintaining overall aviation safety while accommodating the unique operational practices of the hot air balloon industry.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 Exemption Instrument (CASA EX14/16) applies specifically to the hot air balloon aircraft operated by Picture This Ballooning Pty Ltd, as detailed in Schedule 1 of the instrument. The exemption pertains to the requirement to carry a serviceable Mode S transponder as stipulated in paragraph 9E.2 of Civil Aviation Order 20.18. This regulation applies to aircraft registered on or after 6 February 2014, which are operated in Class A, B, C or E airspace, or above 10,000 feet above mean sea level in Class G airspace. The exemption allows these aircraft to operate without the specified transponder equipment, provided that all Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) flight plans in Australian airspace are annotated with "RMK/CASA MODE S EXEMPT" in Item 18 of the flight plan. This exemption is granted to mitigate the risk of transponder coding errors inherent in the operator's practice of frequently swapping baskets and transponders between different balloon envelopes. The exemption is subject to a condition to ensure that the exemption does not adversely affect aviation safety. The instrument is subject to disallowance under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 and is compatible with human rights as it does not engage any applicable rights or freedoms.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) and Civil Aviation Order 20.18 (CAO 20.18) establish strict requirements for aircraft operating in Australian airspace, including the necessity for certain aircraft to be equipped with a serviceable Mode S transponder. Specifically, subregulation 207(2) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 (CAR 1998) mandates that aircraft must be equipped with approved instruments and equipment, and CAO 20.18 outlines the specific requirements for transponders in certain airspaces and flight conditions. However, regulation 11.160(1) of CASR 1998 allows the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to grant exemptions from these provisions if it is satisfied that such an exemption will not compromise the safe navigation and operation of aircraft. In the case of Picture This Ballooning Pty Ltd, an exemption has been granted under CASA EX14/16, allowing their fleet of hot air balloons to operate without complying with the Mode S transponder requirements in paragraph 9E.2 of CAO 20.18. This exemption is contingent on the condition that all Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) flight plans for these aircraft must be annotated with “RMK/CASA MODE S EXEMPT” in Item 18 of the flight plan. This condition is crucial for maintaining safety by ensuring that Airservices Australia’s automated systems recognise and process these exemptions correctly. The obligations imposed by this exemption require Picture This Ballooning Pty Ltd and any person using the exempted aircraft to adhere strictly to the specified condition regarding flight plan annotations. Failure to comply with this condition could lead to the rejection of flight plans and potential safety risks. Additionally, CASA must ensure that such exemptions do not undermine the overall safety of air navigation, as required by section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988. Any breach of the conditions specified in CASA EX14/16 could lead to significant consequences. While specific penalties are not detailed in the instrument, non-compliance with CASA-issued regulations can generally result in enforcement actions, including fines, suspension of operational permits, or other regulatory sanctions. The seriousness of these consequences underscores the importance of adhering to the stipulated conditions to maintain the safety and integrity of air navigation operations.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Administrative Law
Civil Aviation Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Exemptions & Exclusions
Regulatory Standards
Compliance Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.