CASA EX128/15 - Exemption — Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) Controller’s Certificate requirement for manufacturer training

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2015L01211 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Explanatory Statement

Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998

Exemption Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) Controller’s Certificate requirement for manufacturer training

 

Legislation

Subsection 98 (1) of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) provides that the
Governor-General may make regulations for the Act and the safety of air navigation.

 

Subsection 98 (5A) of the Act provides that the regulations may empower CASA to issue instruments in relation to the following:

(a) matters affecting the safe navigation and operation, or the maintenance, of aircraft; or

(b) the airworthiness of, or design standards for, aircraft.

Subregulation 11.160 (1) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) provides that, for subsection 98 (5A) of the Act, CASA may grant an exemption from a provision of the Regulations, including the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 or a provision of the Civil Aviation Orders, in relation to a matter mentioned in that subsection. Under subregulation 11.160 (2), an exemption may be granted to a person, or to a class of persons, and may specify the class by reference to membership of a specified body or any other characteristic.

 

Under subregulation 11.205 (1) of CASR 1998, CASA may impose conditions on an exemption if this is necessary in the interests of the safety of air navigation. Under regulation 11.225, an exemption must be published on the Internet. Under subregulation 11.230 (1), the maximum duration of an exemption is 3 years.

 

Under paragraph 101.295 (2) (d) of CASR 1998, a person is eligible to be certificated as an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) controller if, among other things, he or she has completed a training course in the operation of the type of UAV that he or she proposes to operate, conducted by the UAV’s manufacturer. There are a number of applicants for whom manufacturer training is either not available or impractical to obtain. Technology is now more available to the potential applicant.

 

Instrument

The legislative instrument exempts an applicant for certification as a UAV controller from a normal eligibility requirement in paragraph 101.295 (2) (d) of CASR 1998 to have completed training conducted by the UAV’s manufacturer.

 

Instead, the legislative instrument requires the applicant to have completed a training course conducted by an approved agent of the manufacturer, a type training provider recognised by CASA for that type of UAV, or a UAV operator certificate (UOC) holder who operates that type of UAV in accordance with the UOC holder’s operations manual.

 

Alternatively, for an applicant who purchases a small UAV that is ready to fly, the applicant may complete a flight test conducted by a CASA inspector. A small UAV is defined in regulation 101.240 of CASR 1998 to include an unmanned aeroplane weighing between 100 grams and 150 kilograms, and an unmanned rotorcraft weighing between 100 grams and 100 kilograms.

 

The purpose of this legislative instrument is to enable prospective applicants to obtain appropriate training for certification as a UAV controller where the applicant is not able to complete training conducted by the UAV’s manufacturer.

 

Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (the LIA)

Under section 5 of the LIA, subject to sections 6, 7 and 9 of the LIA, a legislative instrument is an instrument in writing that is of legislative character, and that is or was made in the exercise of a power delegated by the Parliament.

 

For subsection 98 (5A) of the Act, CASA may, by instrument, grant an exemption from compliance with a provision of the regulations. An instrument issued under paragraph 98 (5A) (a) of the Act is a legislative instrument if the instrument is expressed to apply to a class of persons or aircraft. The instrument applies to a class of persons, namely, applicants for UAV controller certification, and is, therefore, a legislative instrument.

 

As a legislative instrument, it is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the LIA.

 

Consultation

The instrument is a renewal of a similar instrument, CASA EX03/12, which expired at the end of 30 December 2014. Before the making of CASA EX03/12, CASA undertook 2 industry studies and invited an industry team to make recommendations. It is CASA’s view that it is not necessary or appropriate to undertake any further consultation under section 17 of the LIA.

 

Office of Best Practice Regulation (OBPR)

A Regulation Impact Statement (RIS) is not required because the instrument is covered by a standing agreement between CASA and OBPR under which a RIS is not required for subordinate instruments of this kind (OBPR id: 14507).

 

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights is at Attachment 1.

Making and commencement

The instrument has been made by the Director of Aviation Safety, on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 73 (2) of the Act.

 

The instrument commences on the day of registration and expires at the end of May 2018, as if it had been repealed by another instrument.

 

[Instrument number CASA EX128/15]

Attachment 1

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011

 

Exemption — Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) Controller’s Certificate requirement for manufacturer training

 

This legislative instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

 

Overview of the legislative instrument

The legislative instrument exempts an applicant for certification as an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) controller from a normal eligibility requirement in paragraph 101.295 (2) (d) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 to have completed training conducted by the UAV’s manufacturer.

 

Instead, the legislative instrument requires the applicant to have completed a training course conducted by an approved agent of the manufacturer, a type training provider recognised by CASA for that type of UAV, or a UAV operator certificate (UOC) holder who operates that type of UAV in accordance with the UOC holder’s operations manual. Alternatively, for an applicant who purchases a small UAV that is ready to fly, the applicant may complete a flight test conducted by a CASA inspector.

 

The purpose of this legislative instrument is to enable prospective applicants to obtain appropriate training for certification as a UAV controller where the applicant is not able to complete training conducted by the UAV’s manufacturer.

 

Human rights implications

This legislative instrument does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.

 

Conclusion

This legislative instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues.

 

Civil Aviation Safety Authority

Overview

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) were enacted to ensure the safety of air navigation and the operation of aircraft within Australia. One of the provisions of these regulations, paragraph 101.295(2)(d), originally required that applicants for certification as an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) controller complete a training course conducted by the UAV’s manufacturer. However, this requirement presented a significant challenge for prospective applicants who either could not access such manufacturer training or for whom it was impractical to do so. In response to this problem, the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) introduced the legislative instrument CASA EX128/15 to provide an exemption from the manufacturer training requirement. This instrument allows applicants to complete training with an approved agent of the manufacturer, a type training provider recognised by CASA, or a UAV operator certificate (UOC) holder who operates that type of UAV in accordance with the UOC holder’s operations manual. Alternatively, applicants who purchase a ready-to-fly small UAV may complete a flight test conducted by a CASA inspector. The legislative instrument aims to ensure that prospective applicants can still obtain the necessary certification to operate UAVs safely, even if they cannot access manufacturer training.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) provide for the safety of air navigation and the operation of aircraft, and under the Civil Aviation Act 1988, the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) has the power to issue regulations and instruments to ensure this safety. Specifically, the authority to grant exemptions from certain regulatory provisions is delegated under subsection 98(5A) of the Act, and these exemptions can be granted to individuals or classes of persons. The exemption in question pertains to the requirement for unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) controllers to complete training conducted by the UAV’s manufacturer, a condition stipulated under paragraph 101.295(2)(d) of the CASR 1998. This exemption allows applicants for UAV controller certification to complete training through approved agents of the manufacturer, recognised type training providers, or UAV operator certificate holders, or to undertake a flight test with a CASA inspector if they purchase a ready-to-fly small UAV. The exemption is subject to conditions imposed by CASA to ensure continued safety and is renewable every three years, with the current exemption set to expire at the end of May 2018. This legislative instrument, being a renewal of a previous exemption, does not require further consultation or a Regulation Impact Statement and is compatible with human rights as it does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) establish several key provisions related to the certification of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) controllers. Under subregulation 11.160(1), the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) can grant exemptions from certain provisions of the regulations, including the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 and Civil Aviation Orders, if they pertain to the safe navigation and operation, maintenance, airworthiness, or design standards of aircraft. This exemption can be granted to an individual or a class of persons and may include specific conditions for safety reasons, as outlined in subregulation 11.205(1). The exemption must be published on the Internet and cannot exceed a duration of three years, as per subregulation 11.230(1). The primary objective of this exemption, as detailed in paragraph 101.295(2)(d) of the CASR 1998, is to ensure that applicants for UAV controller certification can complete necessary training despite the unavailability or impracticality of manufacturer training. The obligations and requirements imposed by the Act on parties or entities governed by the CASR 1998 include adherence to the training provisions outlined in the exemption. Specifically, applicants for UAV controller certification must complete a training course conducted by an approved agent of the manufacturer, a type training provider recognised by CASA, or a UAV operator certificate (UOC) holder operating in accordance with the UOC holder's operations manual. Alternatively, applicants who purchase a small UAV ready to fly can complete a flight test conducted by a CASA inspector, as defined in regulation 101.240 of the CASR 1998. These obligations ensure that applicants meet the necessary safety and operational standards required for UAV controller certification. In terms of offences, penalties, or consequences for breach, the Act does not specify particular offences or penalties related to non-compliance with the training provisions for UAV controller certification. However, non-compliance with the CASR 1998 generally may result in enforcement actions by CASA, which could include fines, revocation of certification, or other administrative penalties. The exact penalties depend on the nature and severity of the non-compliance but are intended to uphold the safety standards within the aviation sector.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Administrative Law
Civil Aviation Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Enforcement Powers
Compliance Obligations
Exemptions & Exclusions
Consultation Requirements

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.