Explanatory Statement
Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998
Exemption – from standard take-off and landing minima – Philippine Airlines
Section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) empowers the Governor-General to make regulations for the Act and the safety of air navigation.
Legislation
Under subregulation 257 (1) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988), CASA may determine the meteorological minima, that is the visibility requirements for landing or take‑off at an aerodrome. Under subregulation 257 (2), the determination must be published in AIP or NOTAMS. Under subregulations 257 (3) and (4), it is an offence for an aircraft to take-off or land if an element of the meteorological minima for that operation is less than that determined for the aircraft at the aerodrome.
The determination of standard meteorological minima for take-off and landing was made in instrument CASA 70/11. The minima are also set out in AIP En Route 1.5, section 4. If conditions are met, the minimum visibility for take-off inside or outside Australian territory is 550 metres. If conditions are met, the minimum visibility for landing inside or outside Australian territory is 800 metres, or 550 metres runway visual range. An exemption would be required to operate with lower minimum visibility (low visibility operations or LVO).
Subregulation 11.160 (1) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) provides that, for subsection 98 (5A) of the Act, CASA may grant an exemption from a provision of the regulations, including CAR 1988, in relation to a matter mentioned in that subsection. Under subregulation 11.160 (2), an exemption may be granted to a person, or to a class of persons, and may specify the class by reference to membership of a specified body or any other characteristic.
Under subregulation 11.205 (1) of CASR 1998, CASA may impose conditions on an exemption if this is necessary in the interests of the safety of air navigation. Under regulation 11.225 of CASR 1998, an exemption must be published on the Internet. Under subregulation 11.230 (1), an exemption ceases on the day specified within it (but no longer than 3 years after its commencement) or, if no day is specified, 3 years after commencement.
Instrument
The exemption has been issued for Philippine Airlines Inc (the operator), an airline based in the Philippines, for the conduct of LVO in Australia. The exemption states the minima for A319‑112, A320-200, A320-214, A330-301, A340-313, B777-3F6ER, B777-36NER, B747‑400, B747-469 and B747-4F6 aircraft, as well as the conditions for their use. The operator’s aircraft will be permitted to conduct low visibility take-offs and Category II landings.
The operator must ensure that specified visibility standards are met for take-off and landing operations. These may be performed only at aerodromes properly equipped to support the LVO conducted under the exemption. As a foreign aircraft operator, the operator must also conduct its operations in accordance with the approval to conduct LVO issued by the Civil Aviation Authority of the Philippines (CAAP).
Legislative Instruments Act
For subsection 98 (5A) of the Act, CASA may, by instrument, grant an exemption from compliance with a provision of the Regulations. An instrument issued under paragraph 98 (5A) (a) of the Act is a legislative instrument if the instrument is expressed to apply to a class of persons or aircraft. The exemption applies to a class of aircraft employed by the operator. The exemption is, therefore, a legislative instrument subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
Consultation
The operator has approval from CAAP to conduct LVO. The operator also has approval to conduct LVO from the United States Federal Aviation Administration, Transport Canada, the Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore and the Seoul Regional Aviation Administration.
The instrument has been prepared at the request of the operator and reflects CASA’s consideration of the operator’s operational history and safety record. The instrument is in similar terms to many instruments issued to foreign operators for the same purpose. CASA considers that no further consultation is appropriate or necessary as the instrument applies only to this aircraft operator.
Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights
A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights is at Attachment 1.
Office of Best Practice Regulation (OBPR)
A Regulation Impact Statement (RIS) is not required because the exemption is covered by a standing agreement between CASA and OBPR under which a RIS is not required for exemptions (OBPR id: 14507).
Making and commencement
The exemption has been made by a delegate of CASA relying on the power of delegation under subregulation 11.260 (1) of CASR 1998.
The instrument commences on the day of registration. It expires at the end of 30 June 2014, as if it had been repealed by another instrument.
[Instrument number CASA EX124/13]
Attachment 1
Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights
Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011
Exemption – from standard take-off and landing minima – Philippine Airlines
This legislative instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.
Overview of the legislative instrument
The legislative instrument permits Philippine Airlines Inc (the operator) to use minima lower than the standard take-off and landing meteorological visibility minima determined by CASA. The exemption is subject to conditions directed by CASA in the interest of safety.
The primary purpose of the legislative instrument is to allow the operator’s aircraft to undertake landing and take-off operations in Australia using reduced visibility minima specified in the exemption. Use of the minima is subject to compliance with the stated conditions.
Human rights implications
This legislative instrument does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.
Conclusion
This legislative instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues.
Civil Aviation Safety Authority